Jump to content

Beldam

Member Since 10 Jul 2009
Offline Last Active Mar 05 2013 02:25 AM
-----

#3352452 alliance race for locks

Posted Beldam on 08 July 2011 - 03:41 AM

Gnome.


#2054600 EXCUSE ME

Posted Beldam on 09 April 2010 - 06:08 AM

Skillionaire said:

I AM REALLY SURPRISED THAT POWERSLAVE IS QQ-RAGING IN CAPS 5 MINUTES AFTER THE WARRIOR CHANGES GOT POSTED!!!

WHO COULD SEE THAT COMING???

This.


#1946635 K since BS fxxxed up,how bout 48/0/23

Posted Beldam on 13 March 2010 - 08:22 AM

Powerslave said:

that's exactly why we need pve gear,we need the high pressure to make up for our limited uptime on dpsing

Thanks for the new sig.


#1710002 [Blizzard] Shield Slam

Posted Beldam on 12 January 2010 - 11:21 PM

Murth said:

Adding threat is a band-aid to the problem... which is why its dissapointing, would be nice to deal the same amount of dps as every other tanking classes, Warrior being the lowest dps tanking in raid is no joke, wiping on saurfang and festergut at 1% sucks, every dps counts.

However checkout this dumb post,

http://blue.mmo-cham...philosophy.html

If the cap is 1960-2072 tanks with 245 gear and below will easily go beyond that, but i guess since they stop itemizing block value on t10 it will hover around 1800.

Curious to know if the cap effect Shield Block's double block value bonus for damage.
This is true.

They should just buff the damage on some other ability to compensate, the only problem with prot damage is the huge 11k+ crits from SS.


#1709985 [Blizzard] Shield Slam

Posted Beldam on 12 January 2010 - 11:14 PM

myrr myrr said:

Bedlam come on,...

I said it doesnt have high survivability. Stop putting words in my mouth. I did not say it was low, I did not say it was mediocre, pink, purple, or even pizza-colored. Get it? There are things that are not black and white. This is one such thing.

44 resi, 16% passive protection from magic, and high armor with average life, doesnt make you anywhere near what one implies with wording such as what GC used yesterday. The way I read it he implied we had things in common with actual tanks.

The survivability of prot comes from the ability to lock out, and/or get the f out of dodge if needed. It does not fare well in "taking a beating". If you doubt me then by all means get your head out your ass and prove it, or go mouth of on the hunter forum instead. I hear they are pretty popular trolltargets at the moment too.

Lets 1 thing straight, prot is faceroll because it is OP.  The skill cap on a prot warrior is ridiculously high, probably as high or higher than any other spec in the game. Does that make it less OP or less faceroll?  No because you can still do extremely well by playing like garbage.

So a spec that can get 3k+ with 44 resil doesn't have high survivability? lol ok.  I don't care WHY they have high survivaiblity (obviously because shield block/stuns/silences/spell reflect/ie the ability to shutdown opponents) Most classes depend on these things for survivaiblity, shuting down enemy damage isn't exclusive to prots.

ex. mages can't "take a beating" as you so eloquently put it, but is their survivability in the "grey area", no.

Last post for me(directed at you) since you are too retarded to understand basic logic/reason/english.  Keep practicing with that mancleave bro. :rolleyes:


#1617756 Pet Survivability

Posted Beldam on 17 December 2009 - 07:36 PM

I have a warrior alt,  I need to record my face when I see a warlock on RoV.  It's part excitement part pity as I charge/hamstring/MS/bladestorm him dead.

I should also record my face when I see a warrior on RoV while on my warlock. I'm positive its pure disgust and terror.

Why have a oval arena but make the teams start in the middle right next to each other?  No blizz it's not epic, it's not cool, it's just stupid.


<