Jump to content


Member Since 24 Feb 2009
Offline Last Active Aug 09 2014 02:03 AM

#4188868 Blitzkriegqt - Cleave or Die (2700 TSG)

Posted DjBenx on 09 August 2014 - 12:24 AM

People say botters, hackers, russians, wintraders etc etc are cancer to this game.

I feel like

is worse

#3853568 PvP Season 12 Ending Soon

Posted Moreudirl on 26 February 2013 - 02:12 AM

Posted Image

Nader Isn't Pleased

#3838433 Yaspresent Results

Posted Moreudirl on 21 January 2013 - 04:47 AM

The weed has been lit on the united states of america

Posted Image

#3816220 Arena representation

Posted Phillol on 06 December 2012 - 12:23 AM

View PostCtuhlu, on 05 December 2012 - 09:29 PM, said:

My assumptions are based on the fact that the traditionally "fringe" specs (Moonkin, Ele, Enhance, Arcane, Fire, Ret) HAVE had representation in certain seasons but it has pretty much always been as part of a wizard or melee cleave. They just don't have the tools that Warriors, Frost Mages, Warlocks, Rogues of pre-S12 have -- so they need to fill up these holes in their toolset by partnering with the specs that don't have the same problem.

If you enforce M/C/H I think these specs and probably every hybrid aside from Shadow Priests would largely disappear from competitive arena. I never said that one grandmaster MCH comp would surface -- that's ridiculous. People play a wide variety of classes so just because RLS might be the best MCH in our hypothetical scenario, it wouldn't mean mages disappear because a lot of good players play mages and they would be fine running RMP or WMP or whathaveyou. But to me MCH would totally fuck with comp diversity. What would a ret paladin run under that system? Ret/Moonkin/Healer? No, it would HAVE to be Ret/Warlock or Ret/Mage (and even those would be shit). A ret paladin would not benefit from partnering with the third or fourth caster on the depth chart -- they would naturally gravitate toward the best casters. This has historically been mages and warlocks, and that's why I think enforcing MCH would have a negative impact on this game's fun factor for about 50% of the games classes. And to be honest WoW arena can't afford to lose any more fun factor at this point.

just stop and go back to GW2

#3772134 New Trap Launcher

Posted Fadezz^ on 16 September 2012 - 08:19 PM

View PostSparkys, on 16 September 2012 - 07:50 PM, said:

why cant we just have freezing arrow back


spahk ur shit

#2659058 Shadowmeld with DOTs trick

Posted Mom on 28 September 2010 - 11:56 PM

My 4 JC gem trick is better. +Rep me for the secret, check armory.

#1752916 [Video]Spriest-rogue-shaman vs rmp

Posted Arterian on 22 January 2010 - 09:30 AM

bIlliAn said:

Jesus christ you play like shit... Cloak on CD and you wait until theres 10 seconds left on cloak to re-dot rogue who still manages to have full buffs... seriously come on, dispelling winters chill?

Really makes me want to try this in S8 with Fadezz and Rex and show you us blowing up the rogue np.

Hex mage on CD, Fear priest on CD, rogue vs rogue, shocks+silences+grounding on priest, win after 23 seconds with priest in a second fear, rogue fully dispelled..

Mage trinkets Hex, Blocks Blind, has 2nd Block up for 2nd Hex

Rogue cloaks while Priest is silenced, Mage spams sheep during stuns/other CC taking almost no damage from Rogue during Evasion and or Stunlock trading. Priest would have trouble getting into position of the other Priest if the Mage controls with R1 FB spam and fakes SWD on Sheep.

Posting the most optimistic strategy on how to beat a team where if they let it happen they're probably sub 2200 rated is fucking hard

what the fuck are you going to ground from a disc priest more valuable than a poly or a frostbolt from the mage you retard