Jump to content

  • Curse Sites


Member Since 14 Aug 2008
Offline Last Active Mar 13 2014 06:30 AM

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Shat on by any warrior comp

03 December 2013 - 01:23 AM

View Postsummlan, on 02 December 2013 - 06:56 PM, said:

Wasnt there a warlock in the winning team at blizzcon this year? And wasnt there alot of warlocks qualified to the tournament this year just like every year?

playing lsd, from an arena tournament server when lsd was a god comp.

lsd did fine at blizzcon, but feel free to go check the ladders and see how it's doing on live.

i promise you warlocks are nothing compared to frost mages on ladder, they're viable but very very mediocre compared to the real classes that actually kill people.

literally nobody is going to agree with you that wls beats wmd or rmd on ladder, because it doesn't and never did.

wls was a good comp for a few weeks, it's not a t2/t3 comp at best.

In Topic: Shat on by any warrior comp

02 December 2013 - 04:16 PM

View PostJamesDean, on 02 December 2013 - 02:37 PM, said:

Not saying WLS is stronger than WM/x or lets just Call it WMD. But yes it does counter that specific setup, even does if you look at the paper.
But hey, according to you, everything counters warlocks in this game...you could actually be awarded as the most biased guy on aj of all time.

i'm telling you right now, as someone that's played both comps, warrior/warlock in no way counters mage/warrior.

tell me how on paper this is a thing.

lets just go over the check list.

mages take very little damage from warlocks, warriors take very little damage from warlocks.

mage/warrior can kill your warrior you or your healer in the opener very easily.

you can't kill any of them in the opener.

mage/warrior is 95% of the pvp ladder, warrior/warlock isn't all that common.

you'd think if warlock/warrior countered mage/warrior the ladder would be all warrior/warlock comps.

edit: you just said gateway is the reason the shaman can live vs wmd, i'm done here, as if gateway does anything to stop wmd from cleaving you down.

In Topic: Shat on by any warrior comp

02 December 2013 - 02:09 PM

View PostJamesDean, on 01 December 2013 - 04:40 PM, said:

Not to be a downer but WLS actually counters mage/warrior/x



that's enough aj in mop for me.

In Topic: Shat on by any warrior comp

01 December 2013 - 03:32 AM

View Postjaimex, on 30 November 2013 - 02:37 PM, said:

Damage isnt the arguement. Boomkins dont do so much single target damage, but they can keep up an entire team by themselves

you're actually clueless, holy shit... you think 7k rejuv ticks can keep an entire team up? outside of hotw/nv moonkins have no healing really.

i'm so confused as to how you're even out of the 1700 bracket right now.

In Topic: Shat on by any warrior comp

01 December 2013 - 03:30 AM

View Postjaimex, on 30 November 2013 - 02:15 PM, said:

Who plays NV in 3s. lol. Spriest literally has no heals outside of shields now, which have a 10 second cd. Nobody plays NV anyway compared to HOTW, and they just spam rejuv which heals more than the resto druid version. Unlike you, I have a interest in shadow and pay attention to who is doing well above 2.2. The fact is, a large amount of them are actually alts of healingstat, who doesnt play anymore. Zunniyaki doesnt play. Craze doesnt play. That russian guy is a wintrader.

EVERYONE PLAYED NV, because it was more healing output than hotw.