Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

Ethanlien

Member Since 09 Dec 2012
Offline Last Active Mar 13 2014 02:31 PM
-----

#3964264 To those saying DKs are "very STRONG" just STOP it alrdy

Posted Gekz on 14 October 2013 - 11:26 PM

Posted Image


#3960107 War comps 5.4

Posted irubuwrongtime on 09 October 2013 - 10:01 PM

From my experience of playing them and against them this patch above 2200 rating, starting from the easiest comp.  All 2300+ viable atm.

WLS(Pala)
WMP(Pala)
KFC(Sham/Priest/Pala)
Turbo(Priest/Pala)
TSG(Pala/Sham)

Yep, TSG is actually a skill comp for some of you that might react to this like wtf.  You only get minimum 1, maximum 3 chances for the kill and if you fail, it's gg.  You can actually play the longer game with rsham but if enemy team goes your rsham, you might as well swap healer. :)

I haven't got to play much kitty this patch which was my main since cata but it seems to own a lot of decent comps out there just by tunneling the healer if enemy team has a holy priest or rsham.  You also need to have a a good healer to back up your mongo.  Priest and rsham seem to be the best healer for kitty this patch.

I've tried a lil bit of war/ele/pala and it was pretty decent as well.  It would have worked out better with priest healer.

I think at the same skill level, my list of strongest warrior comps goes like:

WMP > WLS > KFC and the rest.  Altho TSG/Kitty/Turbo all have a good chance against any of these comps with rsham. :P  Turbo w/ priest is very good against WMP/KFC but weak against WLS in the long game.

Well, we are only like 4th week into the season so it could all change later but I thought it might help some of you who still haven't decided on what comp to run.

Peace~


#3960173 War comps 5.4

Posted irubuwrongtime on 09 October 2013 - 10:34 PM

View PostMarshmellow, on 09 October 2013 - 10:30 PM, said:

and by your logic that makes it the hardest comp in the universe?

Are you even reading my post???  I've listed down just the warrior comps for 5.4 and I was just saying WMP/WLS/KFC are all easier comps compared to TSG.  Wtf...  Stay on the topic already.


#3961442 Is It NOT A Problem?-

Posted Marshmellow on 11 October 2013 - 09:35 AM

implying you even need to juke or open a gap to do damage as a mage now


#3961334 Is It NOT A Problem?-

Posted Braindance on 11 October 2013 - 05:26 AM

View PostJtax, on 11 October 2013 - 05:23 AM, said:

Lies on top of lies on top of lies... you were here all of s12 compalining and bitching that KFC was balanced and they needed to be there OP as fuck to keep Spell Cleaves in Check.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image


#3961274 Is It NOT A Problem?-

Posted Braindance on 11 October 2013 - 04:32 AM

If a warrior is shitting on you

as a mage

you are shit

And not simple shit - pretentious shit as well because you are overpowered as fuck and can zerg anything and anyone at anytime anyplace

So l to the fucking p


#3961307 Is It NOT A Problem?-

Posted Hateformz on 11 October 2013 - 05:09 AM

"it's ok for X to shit on Y"
"it's not ok for Y to shit on X"

junkies in charge of quality posts


#3953825 Fury Warrior 5.4

Posted Veev on 03 October 2013 - 06:12 PM

I don't know why people even associate fury with "yolo one shot"... it doesn't do any more burst than arms really.


#3954368 Fury Warrior 5.4

Posted Caeser on 04 October 2013 - 06:04 AM

View PostEzyo1000, on 03 October 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:

If you could get 35% unbuffed crit, then it would be worth a shot, or something along these lines would probably make it viable:

Glyph of the Rampaging Colossus: Colossus Smash has double the normal chance to be a critical strike and its cd has been reduced to 12 sec, however, the armor bypassed has been reduced by 40%.

Or

Glyph of the Rampaging Colossus: Colossus Smash hits increases your critical strike chance by 5% for 30 sec and its cd has been reduced to 12 sec, however, the armor bypassed has been reduced by 40%. the crit increase does not stack with other critical strike increase effects ( to prevent getting + 10% increase crit with this and the other crit buffs from mages monks and ferals)

Either of these would greatly help fury in pvp because they would solve its biggest issues, low enrage uptime and having to wait 20 sec for cs, and they wouldnt effect pve because bypassing 60% armor of a boss would be a dps loss.

Both of these are shit.

Please stop.


#3851275 MM vs BM for KFC.

Posted Hackattack3 on 19 February 2013 - 07:52 PM

View PostBroxxy, on 18 February 2013 - 10:38 PM, said:

higher skill cap because you have to babysit an at times mentally handicap npc .Biggest turnoff for people that have hated relying on pets for so much when it was just utility tied to em.  But seriously ..I dont even know what higher skill cap means anymore. All in all two way different playstyles. But the fact remains the spec is forgiving . Yeah cc the hunter and or the pet. When the spec has more outs from cc than anything else. Great hunters at the top of the ladders that play the spec great still have an uphill battle with comps they meet. But the same hunters can make any spec that is the best work at the top playing againts the best. . You cant argue that more average players succeed with BM than any hunter spec before it , even after stampede. Even triple dps didnt graduate so many hunters into their first 2200 then this...

Couldn't agree more.

When I hear "forgiving" describing a spec i don't exactly feel like it's rocket science.

There is no need for people to try to complicate the "skill" discussion and derail the thread with one of these skill cap, floor, ceiling debates.  I think most people agree where BM stands.

Kettux,

No need to take offense, if you enjoy BM then keep cleaving up, but don't romanticize the spec into something more than it is.


Off topic,

Broxxy brought up an interesting point, for people who have played KFC (BM) and triple dps last season.  Which was more mongo?


#3850908 MM vs BM for KFC.

Posted Broxxy on 18 February 2013 - 10:38 PM

higher skill cap because you have to babysit an at times mentally handicap npc .Biggest turnoff for people that have hated relying on pets for so much when it was just utility tied to em.  But seriously ..I dont even know what higher skill cap means anymore. All in all two way different playstyles. But the fact remains the spec is forgiving . Yeah cc the hunter and or the pet. When the spec has more outs from cc than anything else. Great hunters at the top of the ladders that play the spec great still have an uphill battle with comps they meet. But the same hunters can make any spec that is the best work at the top playing againts the best. . You cant argue that more average players succeed with BM than any hunter spec before it , even after stampede. Even triple dps didnt graduate so many hunters into their first 2200 then this...


#3850846 MM vs BM for KFC.

Posted Hackattack3 on 18 February 2013 - 08:30 PM

View PostKettu, on 18 February 2013 - 08:10 PM, said:

So you are basicly trying to say that

as MM Powershot->instant Aimed shot->Chimera shot combo = skillfull

and as BM Powershot->blink strike->kill command combo = un-skillfull

Ty for your opinion : )

If you interrupt powershot in both cases, which spec does more passive damage with pets and keeps some damage rolling?  Which spec is less vulnerable to LOS?  Would you agree that BM is a far less viable cc target than MM?

You are welcome : )


#3836637 MM vs BM for KFC.

Posted Jinngofagswag on 17 January 2013 - 08:03 PM

View PostKettu, on 16 January 2013 - 07:15 PM, said:

What exactly makes one hunter spec more "skillful" or "unskillfull" than another one?
relying on pet


#3836120 MM vs BM for KFC.

Posted TteSPORTSDoomsen on 16 January 2013 - 04:54 PM

I think It's really what playstyle you prefer. I'd say that all 3 Hunter speccs are viable in arena and I have seen all 3 above 2400 this season already in different comps. I'd say MM and Survial are the speccs where you can show how good you are.So yeah go with what ever you personally prefer. You shouldn't be forced to play a non-skill specc.


#3650433 Moonkin in MoP

Posted Stubsy on 25 February 2012 - 11:54 AM

Without reading those posts I still want to say that I hope balance druid won't ever be 100% viable because it's just one of those specs I completely dislike.
Just like demonology locks, arcane mages, bm hunter and so on. I can't really say why that is but
in my opinion those specs should stay 'exotic'.
Maybe I am just biased.




<