If feral's deemed so OP it needs a 4% nerf then where are the Mage/Warlock nerfs? If anything's OP at all they're it haha. Just goes to show that Mages and Warlocks really are on top of blizzards pedestal of skill (especially mages) and are impervious to serious nerfs. 16 seasons of unrivaled rank 1 viability says it all pretty much.
Once again blizzard is hinting that if you don't play the few select classes/specs that are "ment" to be OP (looking at you mage/lock) you can't expect to stay decent for more than a few months at a time - a season at most.
They can fix (nerf) Mage/Warlock - but choose not to. Instead they nerf a spec that doesn't need either buffing nor nerfing only because it might be too complicated if it's not nerfed by the exact same number it was buffed by in PvE rofl. 16.6% nerf for a net +/- of 0% would've been the reasonable "nerf". I'm sure if feral wasn't getting buffed in PvE blizzard wouldn't have even thought of touching them.
The only "issue" concerning ferals is not even caused by ferals themselves lol, they only seem broken when paired up with locks (FLS), who happen to be completely off the rails retarded good (again). Almost every single warlock comp is insanely good atm, it's obvious it's not ferals who are broken.
If this goes live I'm out for good pretty much. ( I think)
You play a warlock right? And you're complaining that other classes are "disgusting", the irony lol.
If you seriously think feral's 10 times more aids than Enhancement I guess you're just very bad. But I'm guessing you just have a personal beef with ferals, which is what you base your praise of the nerf on.
rake rake rake rake rake rake rake rake rake rake rake rake he can ded vladmir