Jump to content

Zandire

Member Since 07 May 2008
Offline Last Active Aug 20 2012 10:29 PM
**---

#3004589 Alright so you're ghostcrawler for a day

Posted Serida on 21 January 2011 - 04:20 PM

considering many of you people truly want blizzard to listen to arena junkies for pvp balance your making yourselves look like idiots and making our comunity look like its no better at balancing pvp than wow forum retards.

if you actually had the ability to fix pvp problems and instead of fixing anything you just delete thousands of hours of other peoples work instead of TRYING to balance the game yourself... i dont wanna even insult you, just plz never post about balance again. the game would be better off without you.


#2828687 Most Overpowered Class ATM Poll

Posted Effendix on 19 November 2010 - 07:39 PM

The only thing this poll tells us is that 15,47% of the voters are mages.


#2661364 LSD infested Battlegroup?

Posted Chromix on 29 September 2010 - 04:46 PM

Hyo said:

so many bads in this thread haha

that's kinda ironic since you fucking suck m8


#2607295 Trinket?

Posted Champ on 12 September 2010 - 08:50 AM

that's what she said


#2567201 EU-Rampage [3v3] S8

Posted Knaittiz on 31 August 2010 - 06:31 PM

need that damn rep

:mage:


#2464365 EU-Rampage [3v3] S8

Posted Reliuna on 01 August 2010 - 08:29 PM

fyre said:

you must not of noticed how me and the hunter invited sub-1800 players (no weapon) to practise the cc rotations which does require a lot of communication on both our parts. i really enjoyed that part of the comp. did not so much enjoy where the paladin runs into 3v1s behind boxes

what i meant though is that even though i can have no clue whats going on we can easily win any matchup in our wizcleave (torrents' beat the rapper or w/e theyre called) while playing stoned, you definitely need to be on your toes in atc. maybe pve gear changes that but hey pve makes everything easier doesnt it mr get ccd :)))

edit not even expecting a reaction that is not trolling just trying to get a conversation going that is not sonija pretending to be #1 worldwide or felic pretending shadowmourne does not equal rating

ATC cc rotations? nice joke

you must be very bad at ATC if you find any wizardcleave easier, and btw if you play wizardcleave you actually do have cc-rotations whereof you should consider it more skilled since you're implying so in your post.

ATC > everything, which is why 0 time gladiators can manage to qualify with it at TR while all the LSD teams that qualified included top-notch players. The 2nd ATC in top 8 also includes 3 terribads, 1 of them being an alt who never played prot before


#2321819 EU-Rampage [3v3] S8

Posted Ghoruz on 22 June 2010 - 10:45 PM

Lewz said:

Posted Image

Didn't I read a post where it something in lines with "Cy@ going to stop trolling the forums now"? Must have read it wrong...

Nevertheless, I lol'ed.

+ rep.


#2317713 Hardest DPS class to play [Patch 3.3.3]?

Posted Dues on 22 June 2010 - 12:54 AM

And an intellectual you are not. you are an elitist kid, who uses bandwagons and titles to make points, not a valid real argument, the point is i never said IM DA BEST like children of your stature do, i simply said Ive farmed people Ive farmed, gotten tittles Ive gotten, and proven points Ive MADE.

You, use the armory to make points, saying nothing about My points in comp/Spec, but ok, like you said, none of that means anything.

As for why i don't roll a FMage, is well because Ive never enjoyed playing EZ mode anything, i don't like being a child or fitting in, like you so love to, you play and only play a Mage, cause its fucking easy, i play hard comps and Hard specs, that i make myself, i dont use armory or AJ as a tool for making my toon or comp out.

I play, right now, you don't, your inactive and really should stay that waym with such a pussy attitude, being like me can be summed up by me not backing down when you 12yo gladiator heroes all spam me at once, i know there are people my age cheering me on, or giving me rep(thanks btw), you get your rep from titles and bandwagon kids who know shit about shit, maybe you are one of them? Hummm.

Either way, You can fuck off with your judgment of me or my armory, because until you play a frost DK on BG9 with my comp, and beat the team we can, you can fuck off mr inactive fmage hero, you will get no backing down or ass kissing here, just the truth, not matter how HARD you try to spin it in your direction.

Common sense will ALWAYS prevail, but trolls will rule the forums.

LOL^ at the post above me, so incredibly ironic and funny.

You take the kids Affx, Ill take my adults, we have more fun.


#2276198 It's official, feral charge is back!

Posted Milkycrits on 11 June 2010 - 02:53 AM

I don't think those talent points in feral are wasted.

Brief reasons:
    We won't be immune to sap/poly anymore, so presumably you will want a stealth open. That being the case, improved stealth is quite attractive.
    The points in furor aren't wasted. Talent tree reshuffle makes it an ideal filler. Perseverance is way under budget.
    We don't have tree form to tank. We'll probably use bear. Feral charge works well with this model
    New skills work well with bear form and feral charge. Stampeding Roar and Skull Crush are both useful (i.e. you  can charge, kick charge [8 yard range] and sprint.) You can also help keep your melee partners ontop of a target.
    Feral charge is more reliable for avoiding CC (especially sheep) on yourself than the balance 21pt. It has no cast time and a guaranteed school lock out, as opposed to a simple knockback on 2 sec cast.
    I think that all shifting costs have been reduced. KOTJ no longer provides such a dramatic reduction for feral. Bear tanking seems a viable option.

I think there are very good reasons for favouring a balance type spec though, in particular, the superior regen and cyclone range. I imagine it will be determined by preference, comp and season, where we might see a tankier, kiting emphasis early on change to more of a dreamstate style in the later seasons.


#2249306 Arena Inactivity: Incentive Suggestions

Posted Cendrid on 04 June 2010 - 07:12 PM

I am pretty sure it should just be fine to sit on rating, no matter if they're in first place or not. Some of the less active BGs have Rank 1, 2 or 3 teams with over 100-150 rating below them rest of the pack. Why should teams near the 3000 rating range be forced to keep queueing into a bunch of barely 2600 teams? One disconnect and you have to win another 10-20 matches just to get those points back and that is without losing another one.

The real problem is that the WoW arena population is decreasing, and as seen in other MMOs, they need to start merging servers into fewer Battle groups and reducing the amount of Battle groups people have to hit a high rating and camp it.

Some of the BGs are, as it sits, a total joke. When a couple of teams transfer to a "low-end" BG and go 95%+ Win/Loss to sky rocket to Ranks 1-10, then that BG should just be compacted somewhere else and disposed of. If those Glad level players are really that good, then they'll still succeed.

World PvP is dead, there is no reason to have a BG primarily composed of PvE servers anymore (Emberstorm). If they want to arena seriously, then they can come compete with the rest of us. If they don't want to take arena seriously, then don't expect high ratings.

I think the vast majority of you are trying to take this in the entirely wrong direction.

You cannot take a system like we have now and just expect people to constatly play because "you want to catch up to them." You can do it like they did it, farming 1-5 points at a time. Not trying to get your shot at hitting them for 19-24+ points for a win and losing virtually nothing when you lose. You all just sound like a bunch of Tier 2 players begging to convince "the system" to allow to you try and farm up Tier 1 players with little risk or consequence (to you).

I understand people wanting to sustain healthy competition for the duration of the season. A vast majority of the really good players in BG9 are constantly shifting comps and teammates. I have queued into Hoodrych playing WLD, TSG and Arms War/Balance Druid/Holy Paladin in nearly the same week.

You guys want variety, come and get it. It's right here on BG9.

[another edit] And don't complain that you don't want to transfer servers just to arena. If arena isn't that important to you, then you have no business complaining about this particular topic.

[last edit, I promise] I just realized that the arguement may pop up, "Well if high rated teams HAVE to queue, then they're still going to be competing with high rated teams, also." You're right and that is a pretty valid point, however, that also just encourages what Blizzard would define as arranging matches or win trading. If you KNOW that your team absolutely MUST play 10 games a week and so does everyone else, why not just wait until you also KNOW that the OTHER high rated guys are going to queue? You don't even have to talk to them, I can tell you right now that Reckful's team hit 3000 on 04/19/2010 6:59:42 AM. So from there, I could "study" his team's normal play times by figuring out what days of the week and times he generally plays at and queue during those same time frames. Is it a lot of extra work? Sure. I would bet that the people at that high of ratings have the extra time to put that kind of effort into marketing themselves as professional WoW players, whether they want to actually do it or not would solely be up to them.

Also look at the options for the high rated teams to keep queueing based on "what you can earn" per week with just playing 10 games. Let's use 4 teams in this scenario; now I don't know the exact math behind all of this and I am pretty much using match history from my last pmferal team that was around 2600-2675 MMR and making all of these numbers up.

Team A - 2800 rated with a 2951 MMR
Team B - 2700 rated with a 2724 MMR
Team C - 2400 rated with a 2701 MMR
Team D - 2389 rated with a 2498 MMR

The majority of the whining seems to be coming from the group of players in the "C" bracket.
So, let's say that all 4 teams, because they have to, need to play 10 games for the week.
Team C ends up playing Team D (4) times and plays Teams A & B (3) times each.
Team C goes 2-2 with Team D, resulting in +8, +7, -13, -11 = -9 points
Team C goes 0-3 with Team B, resulting in -2, -1, -1 = -4 points
Team C goes 1-2 with Team A, resulting in +22, -1, -1 = +20 points
Team C ends the week at 2407 (+7) rating, moving up 6 spots on the ladder with a 3-7 record.

Now let's talk about poor team A. Team A... while Team C thought they got all tactical and buffalo beast chopped them up... actually just had the pro mode elemental shaman that is carrying the team disconnect half-way into the match.
Team A ends up playing team B (4) times and plays teams C & D (3) times each.
Team A goes 4-0 with Team B, resulting in +5, +4, +3, +3 = +15 points
Team A goes 2-1 with Team C, resulting in +1, +1, -20 = -18 points
Team A goes 3-0 with Team D, resulting in +1, +1, +0 = +2 points
Team A ends the week at 2799 (-1) rating, moving down 2 spot on the ladder with a 9-1 record.
If they didn't have that unfortunate, unexplainable disconnect, then they would have been up 20 points and moved up 3 spots on the ladder.

Basically, sometimes you have to weigh out risk versus reward. The risk of going 9-1 as a high rated team is not worth the reward of going 10-0, unless you're at the end of season and you're aiming for Rank One. If you're forced to play 10 games a week, it would be more or less expected that "shit will happen." So that leaves those players with the complaint of having to queue for absolutely no reason, except because "they have to" in order to stay competetive.

So, if those players are out of town because they're currently at some Live Sponsored 3v3 Tournament and dropped from Rank 1 to Rank 3 "just because," then that is pretty much bullshit.


#2182297 caster cleaves fotm

Posted God on 15 May 2010 - 10:38 AM

sossaur said:

I love all the casters defending wizcleave and global output.

Casters have always believed everything they do takes more skill than a melee class.

It's one of the dumbest misconceptions in the game.


#1682361 About druids.

Posted Blastz on 05 January 2010 - 10:59 PM

Crit is for people who go boomkin then realize it sucks and respec resto and are too lazy to farm out spirit offsets and argue crit is better so they dont look dumb


#1681975 lol Bryntroll

Posted Dalic on 05 January 2010 - 09:36 PM

Posted Image


#1681581 [Blizzard] Two Week Notice

Posted Aggronaut on 05 January 2010 - 07:49 PM

Barburas said:

Prot :P

They're not warriors...they're faggots


#1676374 It's been 1 month with the Rep system

Posted Biggnome on 04 January 2010 - 12:21 PM

Deccard said:

Instead of giving rep to good posts, people vote based on their opinion on the topic. Not that I blame them. It's just that mainstream equals +reputation.

This guy speaks the truth.

If you disagree with the "homogen. opinion" aka the most mainstream opinions about whats OP and whats not, you'll get +repped. If you however have a different opinion you get fucked.

I got -repped twice from saying WLD was a viable rank 1 combo, despite the fact that it is a viable rank 1 combo.

I don't rly care about the rep system tbh. It seems like there are "gangs" who just constantly downreps some people just because they can, not for anything constructive.

So overall - completely useless system

*update*'

comments i got

"WLD is not rank one capable on competitive battlegrounds, end of story."

"call me 780-247-5510" lol? So i got downrated and the guy asks me to call him. "HEHEHAHEHEH" :D:D

I said RMP is called RMP and not PMR because teams mentioned as melee / caster / healer (WLD;RMP;WMP etc.) and got this:

"stop being so ignorant, let people say what they want"

This is clearly not the general attitude on AJ.

"u dum"

Yes


*update*

For this post i got these -reps

"i agree with u but downrep for fun"

"don't cry be happy"


Think it is pretty solid to reach the conclusion of the rep system being totally worthless.




<