Jump to content

  • Curse Sites


Member Since 04 Apr 2011
Offline Last Active Oct 21 2014 03:44 PM

#4235338 Thoughts on the Prepatch so far?

Posted flannelsoff on 17 October 2014 - 06:40 PM

Patch is optimized for level 100 yet still 10x better than mop.... that's saying something LOL

#4235152 Thoughts on the Prepatch so far?

Posted Sweatyfingrs on 17 October 2014 - 02:16 PM

View PostNmplol, on 17 October 2014 - 12:36 PM, said:

Not to be rude but there's a reason you have no glad titles.

Not to be rude but didn't you wintrade 5s for R1?

#4235125 Thoughts on the Prepatch so far?

Posted Avengelyne on 17 October 2014 - 01:31 PM

Anybody else (specifically melee) notice the "Out of Range" issue versus laggy players is worse than pre-6.0?

#4234189 Protip if you happen to look retarded with new models.

Posted Savoh on 16 October 2014 - 01:15 PM

View PostSosseri, on 15 October 2014 - 10:55 PM, said:

Posted Image

Isis has invaded wow

#4233685 Protip if you happen to look retarded with new models.

Posted Sosseri on 15 October 2014 - 10:55 PM

Posted ImagePosted Image

#4233586 Protip if you happen to look retarded with new models.

Posted Wallirik on 15 October 2014 - 09:43 PM

View PostDillypoo, on 15 October 2014 - 09:13 PM, said:

You can also go into system>advanced>disable new models.
why would you remove this?

Posted Image

#4232908 WoW Up to 7.4 Million Subscribers

Posted Neuromancer on 15 October 2014 - 12:12 PM

View PostFizion, on 15 October 2014 - 11:59 AM, said:

Is Blizzard really proud of that graph?  It looks awful to me.  3 years ago it was ~12M and now it's 7.5M and spiraling down.  I read it as in 3 years wow has lost over 37.5% of its subscribers.  My friends list can confirm those numbers and then some.
First time trying to build a big mmo and still having 7+ mil subs after 10 years? I'm pretty sure they're proud of what they have achieved. Shit, I bet most MMOs since WoW have lost 95%+ subs after 1 year, let alone 3.

#4230583 What is that garrison in WoD ?

Posted Marshmellow on 13 October 2014 - 04:20 PM

View PostShock1911, on 13 October 2014 - 03:19 PM, said:

If they spent half this effort on pvp , just imagine how this game wwill be .....

why put time into pvp when pvers can jerk off to their own personal innkeeper and have a place to watch their favorite mounts walk around and eat hay all day

#4225951 The 8 Teams for Blizzcon

Posted Glink on 07 October 2014 - 01:54 AM

View PostWallirik, on 07 October 2014 - 01:10 AM, said:

well there's a hunter and a windwalker and a warrior, that's 3 out of 8 teams that aren't wiz cleaves.
and right now there's a lot of comps that (usually) shit on wizards.

your words are too big, please use smaller words.
By cognitive I meant are you aware of the situation, do you fully grasp it?

You actually just helped the case for this being "wizzcon" even more.

Yes, out of 8 teams 3 of them contain a physical damage class. And literally everything else and indeed on every team exists a mage/rdruid or lock/rsham including with the aforementioned physical damage classes.

So who exactly are you trying to convince that casters get shit on by cleaves?

#4225939 The 8 Teams for Blizzcon

Posted Pinka on 07 October 2014 - 12:41 AM

Posted Image

#4225762 The 8 Teams for Blizzcon

Posted mirox on 06 October 2014 - 08:09 PM

Wow, Hogwartscon of 2014 is sure gonna be fun to watch.

#4225396 The 8 Teams for Blizzcon

Posted Namechange420x on 06 October 2014 - 09:45 AM

But these hunters and ferals man, broken as fuck

#4222741 358 players will get rank one title this season in EU this is dumb

Posted zzo on 02 October 2014 - 06:57 PM

View PostHackattack3, on 02 October 2014 - 04:24 PM, said:

You bitch about wizards in every post yet you play a ret pal.Edit:  You get countered by wizards as ret I get it, but numbers clearly show it's not a "wizard shit fest" that you like to describe.  Hunt/enhance and rogue/mage seem to be doing just fine.

EU regionals qualfied team:

Godcomp (ft. MageWizard ShadowWiizard DruidWizard)
Godcomp (ft. HarryPotter RonWeasly Dumbledore)
LSD2 (ft. Voldermort Gandalf TheWizardOfOz)

Posted Image

#4220908 Conquest Points Per Win

Posted Xsv on 30 September 2014 - 01:33 PM

View Postdrugdealerx, on 30 September 2014 - 12:42 PM, said:

im trying to read yet the only thing i see is

Posted Image


shut the fuck up

do you actually have any idea how easy it is to gear? 12 hours is a massive exaggeration and i've geared every single one of my alts starting with green gear with someone that also has terrible gear just by dropping mmr

go play cod if you cant even handle to invest a couple hours a night few days in a row in order to get the BEST gear available

You have anger issues.

On topic, it's just tedious to spend that much time getting pvp gear. Sure, it can be done in a day if you really tried. I slowly got it over 2 weeks on one of my alts, but when it comes down to it, I don't care about the gear in itself. I get the gear so I can actually pvp and not feel hindered. If I wanted to get excited about new gear, I would go PVE. It just doesn't make sense at this point in the game.

#4220845 Conquest Points Per Win

Posted Clamnesia on 30 September 2014 - 12:15 PM

View Postdrugdealerx, on 30 September 2014 - 09:52 AM, said:

yea ur totally right and thats why hydra got 2.5 in 2s in full 496 gear

everyone in this thread is actully retarded, gear is so ridiculously easy to get at the moment

if you cant spare one day to get the BEST gear for pvp in the game then maybe you should consider just quitting, its a mmo for fucks sake

Yeah cause fuck people that actually have lives and dont play WoW nonstop everyday in the basement. When you say that you can get full geared in a day, it means 12+hours of nonstop play. lol. Who the fuck even WANTS to spend that much time on this game all at once? There is a such thing known as... the outdoors, ya know?

Edit: ad if you REALLY want to do it as quickly as possile, you have to find someone else ALSO willing to put the time into it with you... And THEY have to actually BE geared.