Jump to content

Capers

Member Since 04 Apr 2011
Offline Last Active Today, 06:19 AM
**---

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Buff Frost Dks Heals

16 December 2014 - 12:49 AM

View PostCovlol, on 14 December 2014 - 08:09 PM, said:

U know dk is in a good spot as soon as angrynerd i mean angrypie starts crying about them.

Every time I see a DK thread, I just know I'm going to open it, and see that spongebob avatar with Angrypie raging everywhere in the thread.

In Topic: Best double dps 2s comp for combat?

12 December 2014 - 05:56 AM

Not sure, but I imagine ret rogue or rogue hunter would be the best.

In Topic: Gladiator dispel gone?

12 December 2014 - 04:52 AM

View PostHidden, on 12 December 2014 - 03:13 AM, said:

I don't really give a fuck but I'd just like to remind you to look at the actual ladder. 2400+ 3v3 EU&US currently has exactly the same amount of feral druids and arms warriors (13 each) and even 2200+ is only 76 vs. 70.

Also your way of argumentation is pretty weird when it comes to high level arena. There have always been and will always be more hybrid class players in PvP simply because of the fact that you pretty much need at least one healer in 3v3 even though only 6/33 specs are heal specs => ~18% of all specs are heal specs but at least 33% of all players need to be healers

If you look closely, even Shaman who is supposed to have shit DPS specs for PvP at the moment has >11% representation at higher MMR.

Yes. Which is why my point was that if the amount of higher arena players of a class (warriors) is greater than that of a SPEC of a hybrid (feral), that doesn't prove anything. If there's more ferals, that would actually make it more proof the other way. I was basically saying representation doesn't really mean all that much, and you can't compare an entire class's representation vs that of one spec of a hybrid.

In Topic: Gladiator dispel gone?

11 December 2014 - 10:58 PM

View PostSnuggli, on 11 December 2014 - 04:51 PM, said:

Why is everyone fucking crying about this holy shit.

You've had glad stance pvp for like, not even a month, and you're all whining. Glad stance isn't even your most viable spec at the moment and you're whining about having to play arms when arms was already better.

warrior forums on aj are such a fucking whine fest




p.s. there is more warriors than ferals in the top 100 on both EU and US so stop acting like warrior isn't as good if not better than ferals since our heals got gutted

The reason we don't want to play arms is because the spec is fucking retarded. None of the spells really mesh together, the rotation is absolutely stupid, and it's completely boring/devoid of basically any utility. At least Glad had SOMETHING you could do, and you didn't have a damn AOE ABILITY as your filler. Not everyone just cares about being "viable." We want the class to be fun.
And someone above pointed out how there's more ferals in the top, but even if there were more warriors you need to remember. There's probably a MUCH larger amount of people that play warriors vs those that play ferals. Feral is 1 spec of 3 (not counting guardian) druid specs. Warrior itself is an entire class. There's going to be more people playing a class than one spec, when the other two specs are viable as well (resto and boomkin.)

In Topic: Gladiator Warrior is Being Nerfed Tomorrow (12/8)

09 December 2014 - 03:58 AM

View PostTomlordmuscle, on 09 December 2014 - 03:34 AM, said:

Gladiator Stance is a level 100 warrior talent, added in Warlords of Draenor. It is granted to Protection warriors choosing Posted Image [Gladiator's Resolve].

Hmm, I must not understand something, then.

Not sure if you're trolling or just retarded. I mean the talent literally says "Also allows you to forgo your defensive role, and instead focus on offensive capabilities." Gladiator stance is just a DPS spec with a sword and shield. If you don't see that I don't know what to say.

<