I'm replacing it first this season. I lose too much stats wearing it(spellpower, resil, stam, regen) and the proc isn't even that good. Resilience is also just too good now. Anyone who says differently doesn't have it and is just jealous or looking for an excuse for terrible ratings.
R N G is NOT reliable and NOT good for healing; dps is an entirely different story. Honestly, how often does the shield proc when you need it? I know I definitely don't need it in the starting gates.
It has. People who have played in BC through Wotlk have been playing for years now, and generally you're going to get better at something the more you do it. Watching my old fraps I can definitely say I've improved.
I genuinely think there should be bans for things like this, it's kind of a joke.
I understand these players are meant to be good (On the frenzy ladder most titles are from 5s, which is stupid anyway) but all that agreeing on a rating does, is kills the competition. That's not even slightly believable and it only seems fair that they should be banned for it. On my BG we will have 24 relentless gladiators, which is so stupid it's not even funny. I'm sure blizzard could ban these kinds of rating sharers, it's not subtle.
Or they could just... not get the title. Don't really see why they should be banned lmao.
They're not, they're just simple and don't explain what to do if X happens or Y does something different, so yeah there should be more "theorycrafting" involved. Other than that they seem pretty decent. Take the RMP one for example, what if your rogue gets sapped? or your priest get sapped and they open hard on you? That's not easy points now is it :P
All these strats assume pom arcane blast and arcane barrage are going to crit for 10k each. I promise you these strats won't work on good players.