why would they review games that were not controversial in the slightest? in all of those other games, the judges called for it to end, and the players all left the arena. wtf could they overturn there? you're the one grasping rofl
aaa not getting awarded victories despite having clear advantages isn't controversial? guess it's only controversial when it suits you. let's be consistent here if you want to scrutinize the rules to such an extent then don't pick and choose where you want to do it.
point is both teams were "victims" of the rules
furthermore col still had a fair chance in the replay with a better comp and map. what more do you want? don't bother talking about their morale because aaa had to put up with this biased crowd, jet lag, timezone difference etc.