Ofcourse! But don't then come and act suprised people are bashing the gameplay and say you're playing offensive 98% of the game, if you're going to play lsd, you will have to face the consequences that people will disliek you for the choice. Real Madrid play beautiful football, and Stoke play long balls with 5 defenders at the back, (we'll call this rmd vs. lsd) Real will play well orchestraed games and will be praised for hwo amazing it was to watch. Stoke may play a great game and win, but no one is saying it was amazing to watch, because it was slow, sluggish, defensive, and not appeasing to the eye.
for the americans reading this who are confused, he is talking about non-american football... not your silly handegg.
Why buff stormbolt to make it more viable then take charge stun away, they would be better off taking away disrupting shout or something. This change will ruin warriors just like taking intercept away in cata did.
USA empires/civilizations: indians shooting arrows and smoking pot doing nothing all day long and sometimes hunting buffalos to avoid starving (agriculture was too mainstream) ; mayans scaring the shit out of the world with a doomed calendar; aztechs sacrificing human lives for their God and eating poop whilst dressing up with jaguar skins; what else was there?
EU empires/civilizations: greeks, romans, holy roman empire, carthage, medieval kingdoms and the list strongly goes on, together with the birth of culture basically. we colonizated the land of Freedom and i'm sure it didn't feel so good to get shot by a musket in the face by bad ass conquistadores (JODER).
in the following centuries you managed to evolve faster than EU ending up being stronger and more advanced thanks to smart EU pioneers that realized murica was where it was at - sadly europeans have always loved killing each other for stupid reasons while usa minded their own business at the other side of the atlantic ocean becoming stronger and stronger. insulting EU is like insulting your own ancestors my dear mcdonalds addicts,
let's not forget your dollar even has the illuminati eye.
1. Tournament realm was not mentioned, does this mean the 2 highest rated teams on EU ladders are getting invited to Blizzcon? As in, current rank 1 team on Misery (2822 rating) and rank 1 team on Cruelty (2808 rating)?
2. If the top 2 on Tournament realm get invited, why wasn't this clearly stated? Since top 2 on tournament realm does not equal "Two of the highest ranked teams" ; Why don't they hire someone with a clue to proofread these kind of announcements to avoid confusion?
3. Or is it just Blizzard's way of telling that the US and EU competitors are already decided? If this is the case, why get people's hopes up?
4. If the competitors are already decided, who is the guy behind the decisions?
"If you're an Arena competitor, it's time to hone your skills and get ready to fight hard for a spot in the event."
Think you forgot to tell the main piece of information: How to fight for a spot in the tournament, gratz Blizzard.
Well why the hell would you remove a feature already in place, seeing that you already have all the code and work done and working?That's just going backwards, isn't it? I'm sure they wouldn't have to do much work to bring skirmishes back and people could finally stop bitching about it.
Remember when you could review every game with the damage and healing done and taken on armory?
what's the point of the TR with all this hunterfest on live brackets...
rather wait till next patch and fix something then release it because this is game a joke atm. gladiatorlossa backpeddling heroes on R1 on most populated battlegroups killing shit in the opener etc.