Jump to content

Thasta

Member Since 07 Jul 2010
Offline Last Active Feb 01 2016 03:32 AM
-----

#4562490 Pruning yes/no cdew poll

Posted Maleficent on 28 January 2016 - 10:26 PM

Pruning is okay when it improves the synergy between abilities and spells. However Blizzard will never get that right so yeh, pruning is bad. They remove stuff that feels right and rarely remove useless stuff.

I'll never truly get over pruning fel flame. Those fucking cocksuckers can fuck off.


#4551858 Can you idiots please stop calling it "Sap Bug"

Posted Zaephyr on 10 December 2015 - 01:43 AM

View PostWoundman, on 08 December 2015 - 02:18 AM, said:

I just remembered that the NE bug was the reason for causing this... I am so washed up, jeez....

Posted Image


washed up with dem sweet sweet oils


#4542570 TBH Sub isn't even the best spec

Posted Randomguy on 21 November 2015 - 02:17 PM

View PostCsedition, on 21 November 2015 - 01:26 PM, said:


Sin is best for 2's, by FAR.


can we please not call assassination "sin" - it sounds incredibly dumb
just call it assa
we dont call subtlety "tlety" either do we?


#4540569 Scripted PvP

Posted Shouri on 17 November 2015 - 07:09 PM

The biggest problem with "scripted pvp" is that almost all damage outside of setup for most of those comps is pretty meaningless. As what was stated earlier the game doesn't really have many decisions to make anymore and you pretty much know your entire game plan before the game starts. A good example of this is mages really only playing around the deep freeze set-up and then just delaying until it's back up.

Personally I think the biggest problem is lack of pressure, especially outside of cooldowns. This game has mainly turned into trading cooldown for cooldown and I think that's really stale game design. In wrath, and also somewhat in MoP, you could force cooldowns with just good swaps and decision making. Another important point is that pressure causes mistakes. People tend to panic under pressure being unable to think clearly and I find it hard to believe that many players nowadays would be able to go through their flowchart pvp while hovering at dangerously low health pools while knowing they have to do something about it. The main thing stopping pressure is just how tanky and self-sufficient too many classes are with dps class healing/damage reduction being way too high and the numerous amount of defensive cooldowns. It's at the point where swapping is usually bad as they'll have all their cooldowns up and the time wasted on trying to kill them will give your main target time to get all their cooldowns back. There's too much of a commitment in hitting a target.

Another problem is also the lack of casting, way too many classes run around spamming instants. Specifically for healers, things like genesis and riptide/unleash having two charges is pretty bad for the game. Deep freeze into polymorph is acceptable but I think it's over the top when they have frost jaw/ring of frost.

Overall, and probably most importantly, the game is just not really that fun anymore for a lot of people. In terms of class balance this expansion has been pretty decent but other than that I can't say I like this expansion more than the others. The three top comps(in my opinion) RMD, turbo, and god comp are all extremely unfun to play against for many of the reasons stated above.


#4540158 Scripted PvP

Posted Bigmoran on 17 November 2015 - 02:20 AM

I was originally going to post this article on Skill-capped. After some deliberation, I decided it would be better suited for AJ. I needed something meaningful for my 1000th post on this website. Even if you don't read this entire post, try and think about what you REALLY value in PvP. Consider what makes you happy and what makes you feel rewarded. The future of WoW PvP rests in the ability not to create balance, but instead to make the game into a rewarding and enjoyable experience.

I've mentioned countless times in threads and on social media that WoD PvP feels scripted. My attitude is not uncommon. Plenty of other players have also expressed feelings of redundancy in gameplay. Overall, enjoyment of PvP seems to be at an all time low. While quantification of player satisfaction is often difficult to guage, the drop in sub numbers--down to a point in which Blizzard will no longer report them--suggests that less and less people are enjoying World of Warcraft. The goal of this article is to show how the scripted feeling of PvP and the lack of rewarding gameplay has contributed to the growing sentiment that PvP is not nearly as fun as it used to be.

What IS the Script?

I should first explain what I mean by 'scripted.' In order to do this, consider how a script works. A script is a series of relationships between conditional statements. A conditional statement is a simple if, then relationship. Here is an example of how this 'scripted' PvP paradigm might play out in an arena match:

-If the enemy Mage uses Polymorph, then I will use Counterspell
-If the enemy Mage is Counterspelled on Polymorph, then I will use Polymorph.


While this may not seem damaging at first, consider the fact that nearly all of the important decisions we make during an arena game revolve around this algorithmic way of thinking. For every enemy action, there is an optimal player reaction that is determined by the 'script' of PvP. For every matchup, there is one optimal strategy. This makes winning feel significantly less rewarding and meaningful. The script makes arena wins feel less like an experience full of ingenuity and creativity and more like persistent, monotonous labor. If you know exactly how a game will play out, your experience will ultimately suffer.

As an aside, there is one thing that we often shake our fists at in PvP. Although we tend to hate RNG, it is the only thing that interferes with the normal operations of the script. Consider an arena game where two teams perfectly matched. They have exactly the same gear, play on the same latency, and have the exact same strategy. Assume that either team will try its absolute best to score a kill while preventing deaths of its own teammates. Under these conditions, what would determine the outcome of the match? It would have to be RNG! If one team gets a series of critical strikes or multistrikes at the right time, it will allow the match to deviate from its harmonious scripted balance. I should add that RNG (and specifically critical strikes) actually contribute to our enjoyment of the game. Oftentimes players will suggest removing crits from the game. Doing so would be damaging to our enjoyment of gameplay. While it may seem meaningless, scoring critical strikes is one of the most intrinsically satisfying elements of gameplay. We love seeing the big numbers. We are enamored by our own ability to deal damage that lights up as slightly bigger font on our screen. I am not kidding. Big numbers feel better, and in a game we are wanting to feel good.

Holinka's Pacing Argument

Recently, PvP developer Brian Holinka posted on Twitter that the average length of games during the World Championships was five and a half minutes. Loosely veiled behind this metric is the idea that PvP is improving because the duration of tournament games is getting shorter. It is true that spectators want shorter games. During Cataclysm and especially during Mists of Pandaria, many players argued that tournament matches were exhausting to watch. It was quite common in MoP to see two wizard cleaves battle it out for 10-15 minutes in a series that could potentially last five games. All in all this provided for a very boring viewer experience.
The problem with this argument is that the pacing does not matter if the match itself is painfully predictable. If you carefully watch the final series between SK-Gaming and Skill-Capped, you can see just how repetitive the game is during its 5.5 minute average duration. Every 30 seconds, Skill-Capped's RMD does the following things:

-Uses either Bash or Cheapshot on SK's Warrior
-Cyclones SK's Warrior
-Kidney Shots SK's Shaman (the kill target)
-Deep Freezes SK's Druid
-Polymorphs SK's Druid


While there is some degree of variance to how this setup is executed, the fact remains that every 30 seconds the RMD is doing exactly the same thing. So in a five minute game, you can expect the same exact thing to happen over and over and over until SK-Gaming makes a mistake or Skill-Capped falls to the attrition of dampening. And by all means, I'm not blaming either team for playing the way they do. For the most part there is no flexibility with either team's strat. I had the opportunity to talk to Healingstat (Skill-Capped's Druid) and I asked him why they never tried to kill SK's Warrior despite him sitting in Battle Stance for the majority of the game, sometimes without a PvP trinket. His reply was that they had played thousands of games against each other and that the 30-second setup strat on the Shaman is the only strat the consistently works. In other words, deviating from the script of going Shaman is utterly futile. There is no point in playing creatively because it does not win games. (I should add that I also heard that Boetar raged at Joefernandes for intervening a Blind because he "didn't know what to trinket." If there is anything that grossly reinforces the script, this is certainly it.)

Bring Back Reward

Of all the things that threaten WoW's ability to remain the most successful MMO of all time, its the fact that the game itself feels unrewarding. While I feel like the script has definitely contributed to this, there are numerous other examples in which gameplay itself does not feel like a rewarding experience. One instance of this is the conversion of many abilities into passive perks and set bonuses. Nature's Grasp was removed from the game and instead turned into a set bonus connected with use of Barkskin and Ironbark. Cold Blood was also pruned and converted into the four piece set bonus for Assassination Rogues. The real damage of pruning is that it left many of its removed abilities into mechanics attached to other spells. Two abilities became one. Two globals became one. Passives are not fun in virtue of being passive. You do not actually perform them--they just happen. Mages don't look at their Flameglow reducing damage and say, "Man, this is awesome!"

Another gross example of unrewarding gameplay is the conversion of many hardcasted damaging spells into instant cast burst abilities. Ice Nova is an ability that not only removes 50% of your root control, but also tunnel visions gameplay into managing two charges of a boring spell. Casted spells always feel better than instant casts. Hard casting involves risk and should result in high payoff. While I do think the class has some deep seeded balance and design problems, Destruction Warlocks are a perfect example of well-balanced risk/reward. Chaos Bolt is a long cast time that deals large damage. When it successfully lands, the Warlock feels like they have done something that required diligent effort. Compare this with the feeling of using two Ice Novas. There is little to no risk (outside of breaking CC). The ability is pressed and the damage is dealt. End of story.

The Hybrid Problem

While this has been an important point of discussion for ages, something needs to be done to address the strength and role of hybrid DPS in matchups. Hybrid healing was gutted for Balance Druids, Shadow Priests, and Elemental Shamans but still remains a problem for Feral Druids, Enhancement Shamans, and Retribution Paladins (perhaps WW Monks to an extend as well). These physical DPS classes are able to provide instant cast heals to themselves and their partners and are able to maintain high damage AND healing throughput over the course of a 3v3 match. There is no good reason that an Enhancement Shaman should be able to do 20k DPS in a game while also doing 10k HPS.

Some Nostalgia

Although he is one of the most controversial posters on this site, Bilian's PvP video continues to be one of my favorite PvP videos of all time. The RMP clips remind me of a time where gameplay was creative and each player made unique contributions to scoring kills.




#4537596 Legion Warlock Preview

Posted Chanimal on 11 November 2015 - 02:49 AM

I'd hope that they go back to the old fantasy that Affliction used to have in BC / LK / Cata. Winning through attrition was such a cool part of the playstyle. Rotting the other team while being able to sustain yourself with small heals (haunt, siphon life procs from corr and drain life) and weakening the enemy (curses) is what Aff is about.

Looks like they're shifting all the damage back into dots, which is good. I also like that Drain Life is once again the filler spell. But, there's no real mention of curses or fear changes, as well as no mention of SB: Haunt. It is an early preview though.

Also hoping that fear gets buffed/reverted in some way. It was extremely broken in MoP because of the ease of applying dots (SB:SS and SS no shard / cd). It didn't impact your damage as much then as it does now to cast fear. And when you do cast fear in WoD, it just breaks to a whiff of air. With lower DoT durations in Legion it's probably going to be even worse than it is now.


#4536390 Blog: WoD PvP Flaws

Posted Mageic on 09 November 2015 - 02:36 AM

So I wrote a blog that highlights some of the current flaws in WoW pvp. Let me know what you think.

http://www.followesp...topics/post/115


#4534950 WoW movie trailer was just shown

Posted amirdaheat on 06 November 2015 - 09:53 PM

View PostJim_Jim, on 06 November 2015 - 08:35 PM, said:

It was good, not the "OMG" i expected, i hope they will not destroy the story with ridiculous scenes (Hello, Legolas on a skate). Still a good fantastic-movie trailer.

I was more "O.O" when i see that :

Posted Image


Blizzard always does SICK cinematics, tbh they should just drop every game and go full-time 2 hour long movies using their CGI


#4525764 Removal of the Rating System

Posted ContortedTV on 22 October 2015 - 09:11 AM

I KNOW BLIZZARD NEVER TAKES ANYTHING WE SAY SERIOUSLY BUT IT'S WORTH A SHOT GUYS!
.
Maybe I'm the only one with this opinion, but here goes:

I think the rating system currently in place is outdated and does not provide a feeling of "fulfillment" to the player. I think looking at a number does not give players the satisfaction they desire when they achieve something.

Obviously someone who gets 3k would not feel this way, but for the vast majority I believe this is the case.

For some reason people always ask me this, and I'm terrible at answering it: but what is the difference between an 1800 player and a 2k player? Is there really any difference? If there is one, what is it?

I think the removal of the current rating system in place will:

1.) Give players more satisfaction upon reaching a goal.
2.) Allow for a greater variety of rewards for reaching your goal (I believe this is a huge issue with PvP in the game at the moment).

Let us say we change the rating system to something similar to CS:GO/League/Starcraft (I'm going to be using Starcraft rankings for this). The following might be an appropriate approximation of what we could see:

100-75%: Bronze - Reward: Nothing
75%-50%: Silver - Reward: Arbitrary Title (Wild Combatant?) + 500g At Season End
50-25%: Gold - Silver Reward + Elite Transmog Armor  + 1,000g At Season End
25-10%: Platinum - Gold Reward + Weapon Transmog + Title (Wild Competitor?) + 1,500g At Season End
10%-5%: Diamond - Platinum Reward + Mount + 2,000g At Season End
5%-1%: Master - Diamond Reward + Mini Pet + Title (Wild Gladiator) + 5,000g At Season End
Top 100?: Grand Master - Master Reward + Exclusive Title + Exclusive Mount + 10,000g At Season End

These rewards are all hypothetical of course (as are the percentiles), but I genuinely think that this system would work better. Instead of saying "Mehh I got 2k this season, good enough", people will now have a clear goal to work towards this season.

Some arbitrary examples:
A.) Man, I got 2k last season... I want to try for 2400 this season.
Doable, but unlikely in most circumstances from past experience. This person could realize at 2200 people are significantly better than he was being a 2k player, and it makes 2400 seem unreachable. 400 rating as opposed to a tier is much more confusing.
B.) Hmm... I couldn't quite get platinum last season, but maybe this season I can and even go for diamond.
Once again, unlikely given the above percentiles, but it gives a clear goal as opposed to an almost arbitrary number.

This system also makes it much easier and less confusing for reward returns. You get to a certain tier, and you obtain your rewards based on which tier you got.

Obviously, this also causes another issue which is even bigger: sitting your tier. Well... obviously rating decay should take place (*COUGH COUGH COUGH*).

Instead of losing -50 rating every two weeks of inactivity like it should be, you now decay relative to your ladder position in your tier with this system. Maybe 10 spots for every two weeks of inactivity? This makes the punishment less harsh on lower tier'd players, and much more harsh on those who are in the upper tiers (if there are only 50 people in Diamond and you decay 10 spots... enjoy Platinum).

I also think the decay should require you to play a minimum of 10 games/week. So if you're inactive for 13 days, you need to play 20 games that last day.

I personally think this would give more people an incentive to play Arenas and create a healthier ladder environment. I know this is not the biggest thing on Blizzard's minds (or most likely on their minds at all), but giving players a sense of fulfillment will not only increase activity in player's efforts to fulfill their goals; but it will create a bigger voice for the PvP community.

Why should Blizzard fix mages in PvP when only 200,000 people care? Why should that be their biggest concern? If more people play arenas, more people will care, and more things will actually get fixed instead of these small bandages Blizzard keeps putting on classes to "balance" them.

I know this is not the biggest issue with PvP at the moment, I don't disagree. I also understand this one might take the most effort of any PvP issue (if anyone else besides me even thinks it's an issue). I think it's important to give the people who don't regularly arena an incentive to try it.

My girlfriend plays this game. I've had more fun playing with her friends (doing achievements/old raids/mount farming, etc) than doing arenas in this game over the past few months. Most people like her and her friends actually look at us like we're elitist assholes. I mean... we are, but that's not the point. Those people don't want to arena because of how daunting the task seems. I think that "2400 rating before you're relevant" idea is kind of silly. I think this could get more people doing arenas and creating a bigger, better community overall.

EDIT: Oh by the way, this only works if the seasons are much shorter... BLIZZARD YOU DO NOT NEED TO EXTEND SEASONS TO BE A FULL PATCH'S LENGTH! We could've had six seasons already and no one would've given a fuck. Actually, people would be happier!

EDIT2: Seems to be some misunderstanding in the comments. I would gladly fix the game mechanics/balance issues over this; if given the choice. I think making the PvP community grow will lead to more mechanical fixes/etc than just screaming "BLIZZARD WTF ARE YOU DOING?!". It gives Blizzard a reason to care if 2 million people, as opposed to 200,000, are telling them: OH MY GOD NERF RMD/SHATTER/WALKING DEAD/TURBO.
Also, the tier'd system is almost irrelevant. It's the exact same thing as the system currently in place: but with a set of "stepping stones" that allows new players to correctly identify what their next goal should be (1550->1750->2000->2200->2400->2700 achievements are not the right stepping stones and you guys know it...), and allow rewards to go out in an easy way. It doesn't matter if they implement this system or not, I think it's more appealing to new players: but ultimately the rewards matter.

TL;DR: The PvP community is too small, and I think the rewards/current rating system is a big part of it and am ultimately trying to propose an idea (that most likely will never be glanced at by a Blizzard employee, let alone given any thought) that would give more players an incentive to play arenas more frequently.


#4522251 WoD S3 Accolade trinkets

Posted Nahj on 16 October 2015 - 07:28 PM

The technology isn't there yet ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


#4523286 Genesis.

Posted Jim_Jim on 18 October 2015 - 02:08 PM

... is not affected by the PvP rule of +50% for crit :

Duel situation :

Posted Image

I don't know how much crit a druid have in PvP. (Maybe 15% i guess with the mage buff?)


#4522173 If you beta'd WoD you let us down.

Posted Capstone on 16 October 2015 - 03:52 PM

View PostVoksen, on 15 October 2015 - 10:34 PM, said:

To the people who beta tested WoD:

You fucking suck and let many people down.  You're basically the last line of defense against the tyranny of Holinka and his team.  Scores of people would have loved your job and/or taken it seriously.  Many followed you from the sidelines as people made videos, promoted how good WoD was going to be, and spammed how good of a design it was going to be.  omfg the hype was so real.

Most (not all, obv) beta testers need to owe up to this.  You didn't do enough.  Yes, the beta fixed a lot of bugs (although these days most bugs are caught via proper software engineering and validation.  But it didn't come close to having an effect on pushing good changes into WoD.

I blame the types of people selected for beta testing.  After you rule out the random kids selected for hardware testing reasons, you're left with a ton of people who didn't commit to improving the game via outcry, feedback, and distancing themselves from the hand that feeds them.

If you beta tested WoD you probably shouldn't be allowed to beta test Legion.
do you work at blizzard?  do you know what kind of feedback beta testers provided?  can you account for the testing done by every WoD beta player (or any WoD beta player)?  or do you know none of these things, and are totally just speculating?  you make generalizations about every tester, but i find it difficult to believe you can even account for the average tester.  i'd be surprised if you could account for more than five

it sounds like you have no idea what feedback anyone provided and are just complaining, which is strange, because in an even longer point you acknowledge the fact that blizzard is so shit that even with all of the resources any company can reasonably expect they cannot even keep their flagship game from regressing

there was nothing any number of beta testers could have done to save this shit.  there is no amount of constructive feedback any number of players or communities could give this shit company to make them effect any positive change.  until there are no players left on your favorite, home server, they will continue to squeeze the life out of this game, disregarding any legitimate opinion as the uninformed wishes of a simple user.  holinka will make a tweet, in an attempt to channel the wit of a second grade Capstone, of how an arenajunkie like yourself will just complain about anything, self-assured that your perspective is inferior; one of someone who has never designed games. how could you possibly know better than he?  i'll have you know holinka has been designing shit games for 19 years

i have beta tested for blizzard before.  i reported a bunch of bugged shit and ridiculous abilities.  a quest in sholazar basin which did not function properly (which i still fucking think is bugged).  i was earnest in my attempts to improve the game.  you did not have to be a genius to understand that death knights were as absolutely fucked as shit could be.  when the game came out, i noticed, one by one, they had all made it to live.  i solo'd a wing of 25-player Naxxramas and reported the bug.  in return, i got banned for three days, and they didn't even fix the shit until some guy made a video of it on warcraftmovies

trying to be constructive toward this company is embarrassing.  i would feel like an idiot going to the WoW forums to post ideas to improve the game, because believing in my ability to have a positive influence on the design of this game would be an indication of inability to learn from past mistakes.  even now, i cringe at the naivete of mop players that believe things will get better

the next expansion could be good, but most likely, it will just be shit.  people will start coming out of the woodwork talking about cool shit they have seen and how it looks like there could be some really positive changes, but it will come out and be shit.  and you know what else?  most of us will play it for a while, just to be sure that it is shit, like we didn't already know.  those of us who enjoy shit the most will continue to play it, complaining the entire time that it is shit, talking about how even the last iteration of shit was slightly less shit than the shit we have now, and looking forward to what might come with the next cycle of shit.  there's no escaping it, though.  this game, and everyone in its orbit, is doomed to a destiny of experienced-varied shit, and no beta testing will ever save that


#4521813 If you beta'd WoD you let us down.

Posted Randomguy on 15 October 2015 - 11:45 PM

So many problems with betatesting for wow arenas :(
1. no incentive to queue wow beta arenas (no reward) -> crazy long queues vs shit teams most of the time and only skirms
2. people who actually queue don't play their "main classes" most of the time
3. Latency ~240+ for EU -> really hard to play as some melee, impossible for classes like monks(ww)
4. people scumbagging around with bugged abilities (fuck you supatease) to dc ppl/instawin which makes it even more unfun -> even less ppl queueing
5. almost no number tuning during beta (lolxd will do numbertuning in the end xd) so the game is incredibly unbalanced (ele being a better healer than restosham)
6. if there is any feedback no matter how well written it will usually be ignored
7. I'm pretty sure the WOD leveling perks weren't even enabled for the pvp premade chars (40%ap buff for hunters, +20%redbuff, cp from FoK,sv trap CD) which change gameplay drastically (I think there was a perk every level in the beginning...system got overhauled @end of beta)

You can't really blame it on the players - it became pretty clear early how shit a few classes were from a mechanical point (arms warrior, wwmonk) and yet Blizzard did nothing. And here we ended up with arms warriors dmg rotation(lololol) and WWMonks using their mobility spells standing in place to do dmg and the rest of the meaningful dmg tied to a melee range channeled spell for which you have to stand in place. And Mages.......


#4519155 Ban advertisements of boosting sites?

Posted Bluckstack on 12 October 2015 - 02:15 AM

Blizzard doesnt promote tournaments or anything relevant for those interesed to make money out of the game (1 tourney per year and we know all the bullshit that comes with it lately), ¿ is boosting bad for the game ? indeed, but its as bad aswell that the company that landed the game does nothing for the game itself and you re paying around 10 eur/month to play, not sure exactly why you focus so much on boosting, for sure if you would have monthly tournaments or some promotion from blizz to have people entertained while winning some money I am sure boosting would end up dying.

As someone said before I see it more nowadays as a "fuck you blizz" situation than anything since they dont bring out content for pvp players to be entertained with and to be fair they laugh at the faces of those who actually expend time on it, I would encourage people to stop hating one another for boosting or w/e random reason they find and much rather join forces against blizzard to make this game somewhat competitive/entertaining, at the end of the day what people want is to play the game and as Xonika mentioned before if it werent for boosting in last season's state for example you wouldnt get decent que's at all.

Boosting have been there before 95% of you who read this today even made a lvl 1 character on this game, and no one had problems with it for years (bc + wotlk + cata + end of pandaria) because the community itself was stronger and happier, what happens now is a reflection of how the pvp community nowadays hate everything and everyone, you see people advertising boosting sites but hating on those who boost, you see people hating on players because of the comps they play and you guys dont realize that people only want to play the fucking game and they do everything they can because literally the company owners do nothing for the game, so they try w/e reason they find to have fun while playing.

tl;dr: stop hating each other, nothing (not even boosting) will hit WoW as hard as blizzard decisionmaking/indifference does, try do something to fix that if you want to see this game growing


#4519167 Ban advertisements of boosting sites?

Posted Thaya on 12 October 2015 - 02:44 AM

View PostBluckstack, on 12 October 2015 - 02:15 AM, said:

Blizzard doesnt promote tournaments or anything relevant for those interesed to make money out of the game (1 tourney per year and we know all the bullshit that comes with it lately), ¿ is boosting bad for the game ? indeed, but its as bad aswell that the company that landed the game does nothing for the game itself and you re paying around 10 eur/month to play, not sure exactly why you focus so much on boosting, for sure if you would have monthly tournaments or some promotion from blizz to have people entertained while winning some money I am sure boosting would end up dying.

As someone said before I see it more nowadays as a "fuck you blizz" situation than anything since they dont bring out content for pvp players to be entertained with and to be fair they laugh at the faces of those who actually expend time on it, I would encourage people to stop hating one another for boosting or w/e random reason they find and much rather join forces against blizzard to make this game somewhat competitive/entertaining, at the end of the day what people want is to play the game and as Xonika mentioned before if it werent for boosting in last season's state for example you wouldnt get decent que's at all.

Boosting have been there before 95% of you who read this today even made a lvl 1 character on this game, and no one had problems with it for years (bc + wotlk + cata + end of pandaria) because the community itself was stronger and happier, what happens now is a reflection of how the pvp community nowadays hate everything and everyone, you see people advertising boosting sites but hating on those who boost, you see people hating on players because of the comps they play and you guys dont realize that people only want to play the fucking game and they do everything they can because literally the company owners do nothing for the game, so they try w/e reason they find to have fun while playing.

tl;dr: stop hating each other, nothing (not even boosting) will hit WoW as hard as blizzard decisionmaking/indifference does, try do something to fix that if you want to see this game growing
let me stop you right there

i've complained about boosting since tbc. or, more specifically, about the system being flawed in many many ways. there was a steady increasing trend of people getting more than 1 glad title per season (i.e. alts/boosting), so you could tell that eventually all titles will be obtained by a (relatively) very small group of players, and here we are today

boosting and alt accounts are things that you just have to take as a given, and design your system around it. you could make these rewards scale differently (e.g. how league of legends does it - once an acc is diamond, it basically stays diamond [and in the past: literally stays diamond]), you could put more emphasis on peoples CURRENT ratings rather than the end of season ones (e.g. you have a gladiator title for as long as you're >2600 or within a certain % or whatever - i never understood why the title works the way it does anyway, it makes sense for a mount, but the title not really), and so on. there's a lot of ways to make boosting not worth it while playing legitimately more worth it; there are also ways of solving the issue of "i have a high rating but want to play with a lowbie friend" (you could modify the amount of rating change for someone who is way out of the matches average rating, so if you're 3.5k and play with your 1.2k friends, you gain and lose 0's; boosting is not a big issue here because your 1.2k friends will still be playing vs ~1.8k players and getting buttfucked)

what blows my mind the most is that this particular issue is much easier to fix than any of the other issues. designing great gameplay or content is much harder and requires more resources. this entire issue is mathematical, and there are already existing systems that work much better, they just need to be implemented, that's all. it's barely any work from a development standpoint, and if you go the copypaste route, it's also a minimal amount of testing and iteration because that is already done by the other game(s).

bottom line: it doesn't take a genius to figure out that the system is insanely flawed. it also doesn't take a lot of resources for a developer to fix it. i can't think of many reasons they wouldn't fix it other than "cba", since blizzard clearly and obviously has the talent and the resources to do so - in fact, it would cost them very little.




<