Jump to content


Member Since 17 May 2010
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 06:32 AM

#4405284 The "Funny Picture" thread

Posted Reliuna on 27 March 2015 - 06:54 PM

Posted Image

#4404060 Why don't you have a Girlfriend Junkie?

Posted Zaephyr on 23 March 2015 - 03:56 PM

[quote name='FTRouslan' timestamp='1425159166' post='4394596']
Two weeks ago, I managed to get with a qt azn chick that I've been friends with for two years, but never made a move on (and vice versa) because I was in a relationship. Cute, 5'9", great body, with a chill, sensitive, and often lively personality. Ended up having a surprise valentines day volunteering meet-up where we connected and held hands. Two days later, we were furiously making out and I got to second base. At school, she was all over me and I got attached. My first relationship was super intimate and I felt that this would end up the same way. Our chemistry was great, and we seemed to mesh well together.

Three days ago, she became distant and broke up with me. Apparently she wanted to get to know me more as a friend, which pretty much has meant "I want you out of my life". I don't know what to even say. It's crushed my entire weekend so far. Maybe I was too overbearing. Maybe I should have been less available. Maybe we should have stayed friends and never taken that risk.

It's times like this that make me wonder if I'll ever have another relationship where I'm not constantly worrying about losing attraction from the other side. Somebody to share my dreams. Somebody to give my fullest to support. Somebody that I can do almost anything with and explore life together. My first relationship was like that, but unfortunately shit circumstances made it fall apart. And now, I don't know whether it was luck of the draw with biology/psychology or a true connection, considering that I was never able to reconcile with ex #1. Is any successful long-term relationship more than biology/psychology?

Might as well play the hook up game until that person magically comes along again, but I don't even like having sex wth random people. Fuck me, right?

I like you man, so im gonna be real.

Stop getting attached to chicks, you're what, 18? 19? who gives a fuck at that age.

Let them know straight up you're not interested in anything serious and just have some fucking fun. They appreciate that shit. Trust me.

Being too forward and too keen is probably the biggest turn off.

I know you got this my nigga.

#4403558 The "Funny Picture" thread

Posted Alcohoulix on 22 March 2015 - 10:53 AM

Posted Image

#4403434 The "Funny Picture" thread

Posted pharrelle on 21 March 2015 - 11:55 PM

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

#4403394 The "Funny Picture" thread

Posted Reliuna on 21 March 2015 - 10:17 PM

a black man, a thief and a drug dealer walks into a bar
and that's just the first person

#4403384 The "Funny Picture" thread

Posted Reliuna on 21 March 2015 - 09:25 PM

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

#4398986 The "Funny Picture" thread

Posted Alcohoulix on 11 March 2015 - 04:52 PM

Posted Image

#4387568 The "Funny Picture" thread

Posted Reliuna on 14 February 2015 - 09:59 PM

Katy Perry Attempts Crowdsurfing

At this point, she knew she had fucked up.
Posted Image

#4395472 The "Funny Picture" thread

Posted Reliuna on 02 March 2015 - 11:56 PM

Posted Image

#4390316 Why don't you have a Girlfriend Junkie?

Posted Zaephyr on 20 February 2015 - 10:35 AM

View PostTwaenkz, on 20 February 2015 - 10:29 AM, said:

I started using tinder and i got my first match after 3 days (must have took so long cuz all the girls feint when they saw my pic and forgot to right swipe it)

She was a real qt

have you smanged her yet

#4389884 Why don't you have a Girlfriend Junkie?

Posted Forumz on 19 February 2015 - 10:33 AM

View PostSlashgiggle, on 19 February 2015 - 02:27 AM, said:

Send her some dick pics asap, it's pretty clear that's what she is after.
Thanks dude, I will do this. It was my train of thought before anyway. When in doubt, dick pics.

#4389824 Why don't you have a Girlfriend Junkie?

Posted Zaephyr on 19 February 2015 - 07:06 AM

View Postglonglon, on 17 February 2015 - 10:24 PM, said:

I'll be ready in 5 minutes = I'll be ready in 15 minutes.

that's optimistic

#4389546 Official UEFA & Football/Soccer Thread

Posted Lmkt on 18 February 2015 - 01:25 PM

I think going hard on Hazard is kind of a high risk, high reward situation, and in this instance it worked well so either way I'm not complaining. PSG is capable of playing brilliant football at times, but we also have a nice array of players capable of 'clever' cynical fouling, like Thiago Motta (who was injured but he's probably the best at it), David Luiz or Verratti. It's nice being able to vary our playstyle, even if it doesn't happen effectively so often because Laurent Blanc is out of his depth most of the time. In the end Hazard was probably the only player offering attacking guile to Chelsea, and he was pretty much nullified by fouls and tight marking.


if the ref didn't let you guys get away with murder in the first half, and Veratti gets rightfully sent off, that Ramires foul probably doesn't even happen.
I'm not sure we can be so assertive. Maybe Ramires was frustrated with all the fouling going on and just lashed out at the end. Or maybe he realized the ref was being lenient and went for it knowing it wouldn't get called. Or he just made a stupid mistake and the ref didn't see it properly. No way to tell, IMO. Anyway it was a nice game and I hope we can make something out of the return leg. Last year we had a 3-1 advantage and played way too defensively at Stanford Bridge. Today we're in a completely different situation and our mindset will be totally different, I expect a thrilling game.

#4389360 Official UEFA & Football/Soccer Thread

Posted Lmkt on 18 February 2015 - 12:39 AM

he didn't call Ramires penalty at the end of the game, he didn't call some yellows for PSG, whatever, that's football

#4379146 i hate the new england patriots because they're filthy cheaters and get a...

Posted Matisse on 02 February 2015 - 11:42 PM

View Postpanooc, on 02 February 2015 - 04:06 AM, said:

they actually did a study on this. the balls deflated is huge.

less air= the ball conformed to their surface area of their hand/foot better their for less fumbles/dropped passes
so ya, i love u blame, but yes it does matter lol, they did it all season and other seasons aswell

oh and this is their SECOND. time.

To clear things up a little: 11/12 balls were under the minimum of 12.5PSI, but only one was actually 2PSI light. Most were just barely under.


Such a non-story/non-issue to begin with. NFL coaches interviewed said it wasn't a big deal. And between media talking about nothing other than 'deflategate' and Lynch not wanting to answer questions, the past week has been beyond annoying.

Someone was throwing around the theory that these stories were meant to divert attention away from the NFL's concussion issue (after a player was seemingly concussed yet continued to play (in NFC championship game? not sure on details. Wilson maybe?)).

If the NFL really cared about this they'd make the teams use NFL regulation balls or something, rather than having the teams supply their own. Supposedly the refs check/guard the balls before the game (and NFL maintains that the refs did everything right), yet none of them even noticed until it was pointed out to them.


Breadsticks don't go agreeing with him, I thought we were buds.

I do agree on shitty playcall + shitty execution, but great play from Butler too. Post-game he said that when the Hawks lined up like that, and then seeing how one of those two receives threw a pick, he knew what route it was and jumped it -- dude knew his stuff. Standard Belichick really.