Jump to content


Member Since 21 Dec 2009
Offline Last Active Today, 02:37 AM

#4538370 Legion Rogue Preview

Posted Dizzeeyo on 12 November 2015 - 07:20 PM

View PostMaleficent, on 12 November 2015 - 04:22 PM, said:

You're a genuine asshole (and possibly retard) if you honestly think crippling at 70% was balanced.
in tbc/wotlk 70% snare on crippling was absolutely balanced, considering rogues had 0 healing/passive defenses

#4533081 EU vs. US leggo

Posted Voksen on 03 November 2015 - 08:47 AM

View PostCapstone, on 03 November 2015 - 08:15 AM, said:

depends on where and what you played

on some bgs the top teams played each other on the last day/week, on other bgs they just dodged and farmed africa

also a ton of people xferred to bongwater at the last second and just blasted a battlegroup of dummy teams. the titles never really meant anything

Sounds more like end of wotlk then all of tbc and maybe up to s6-s7.

Heres the wall of text for @Balance.

In US, TBC titles from Bloodlust (BG9), Rampage (BG3?), Ruin (BG5) were legit, prob also Vengeance and one other.  So like 3-4 bgs were pretty unshakeable and the game wasn't developed enough for any team to just walk in and takeover (on those bgs).

Part of the reason is based on the TBC queueing system (was slower and more selective than the wotlk revamp), and also cause someone strong in 3v3 was probably already locked into a hard earned, strong 2v2 rating.  I don't really think people xferred for r1 titles from 2s or 3s back then, maybe 5s though.  The only bracket you could actually sort-of wintrade in was 5s.  Everything else had way too many queues (even in offhours) for the whole 3-2-1 queue between trader and tradee.

As for the leapfrog/passing thing --> yes it was possible but it was well guarded against.  The queues would thin out near the top, so much so that the top people would use AJ to post a "we are queing now".  As more people did this, you'd get this kind of critical mass that would snowball.  This made unofficial scheduling of a prime time window.  Pretty much every good sport would queue then.  And, if you checked the logs you could easily identify wintrading.  Yes, we had advanced armory with complete dmg/hp/details logs back then.  The public could see what was up, every game.  Shit wasn't streamed either so less real-time ghosting and all that.

To get the proper r1 slot, you did have to defend against being passed the night before season's end.  So you're r1 at 2608 and number two and number three teams are only feasible passers within X hours, you might set some lvl 1's up to monitor.  It would be a late/long night.   If they start queueing you had basically no choice but to queue into them.  You had one class/spec/comp none of this insta form a counter comp with alts.  So no real counter comping or dodging/sniping.  In TBC wayyy more often then not, the better team simply won.  By WOTLK this did evolve a little bit and sometimes people would agree on just tying for r1 (usually on shitter bg).

The oldschool ladder integrity tended to be self-reinforcing.  For this and other reasons, I would think irregardless of current game state, that an oldschool title is more significant.  Shortlist of reasons (some opinions but a lot of raw facts):

-- steady activity all season with last minute pushes.  less social media surrounding the game meant your presence in-game determined your connectedness to ladder activity.
-- mmr system wasn't fucked like it is today --> slower more incremental ratings changes buffered (somewhat) against those 1 night snipes or tanks.
-- mmr system was scaled inwards with less runaway effects like today.  Your 3100 rating was 2600 back then, and you couldn't reach this "escape velocity" where you just learn some cd chain that farms the same feeders and shit over and over at 2700 to reach 3000.
-- no teams were there to really throw away rating, feed or deliberately tank because competition and charter --> hard grind.
-- r1 on some class or spec meant it was your main.  end of story.  IMO people had to play a lot harder and be a lot better at their single class/spec/comp.  No toggling over to alts and forming groups instantly at xyz mmr --> less meta.
-- Less boosts, mods, scripts, bots, cheats, etc.
-- Less min/maxing and less meta-gaming --> no idea who was queuing until the gates opened.  Some people would try to snipe/dodge based on a lvl 1 scout toon or get their friends.  There was also a time-delay on arena status updates.  And no bnet.  So you basically didn't get real-time info on who/what was where --> curved dodging/sniping.  
-- Something like 30x more people actively caring about the game --> more competition.
-- Something like 3-4 esport tournaments across 2-3 active circuits each year while the game was still fresh --> more competition.

#4531206 Wow guys i found Eugene on youtube!!

Posted xndr on 31 October 2015 - 04:40 PM

Posted Image

too bad that nobody cared to "find" you on your birthday


#4530174 Bring back titles to 2's in Legion?

Posted Voksen on 29 October 2015 - 11:37 PM

OP:  A legitimate question, too bad your context went over most people's heads.

All kinds of sheep jumping on the "no" bandwagon.  No...to what exactly?  Stop being:  trolls, EU as fuck, Activision jaded, too new to remember the golden age, or just plain AJ toxic.  I'll bite, and take 5 mins to be constructive...

You need to differentiate between opinion on the bracket currently vs. potentially.  Currently its fucking bad --> the end.  However, the potential for balanced, legitimate, and sufficiently competitive 2v2 is there.  Maybe not for tournaments, but at least enough for titles.  This is fact based on (i) history, and (ii) simpler in balance design then 3v3/5v5.  There is absolutely no structural reason why you couldn't dial down the balance tuning for small scale fights.  Yes, this risks alienating the large-scale group fight players.  Of course there are reasons why you wouldn't expect successful 2v2 balance to happen -- mainly because Blizzard cba.

I think the devs need to seriously look at re-introducing 2v2 titles, even moreso then 5v5 titles.  The OP gives reasons why it could work based on Legion design.  I'll add some business model reasons:
  • A shrinking and increasingly isolated player base, where getting the other people together for 'competitive' large-scale fights is going to become a challenge in and of itself.
  • More pairing-off and group-completion per unit time per queue volume.  This yields more ladder entropy/activity and faster queues.
There was a time when 2v2 was way more balanced then 3v3 is right now, and ofc lightyears more legit then lol 2s since prob cata.  Alas, most people focus on the 1 or 2 exceptions like those poorly played hunt/druid 40 min games.  Personally I'd like to see 2v2 titles based around charters, which force a kind of lock-in commitment to synergize/intimacy with someone, and not just give up and head back to LFG after 2-3 losses.  This way you get less fotm cookie cutting and cleave out most of the metagaming and char select that happens in charterless 3v3.

Do I think Legion will be balanced (for any bracket arenas) at all in any way?  Probably not.  If by chance it is, it will be because of more ability homogenization, or a console-level simplification.

#4526124 First legion leaks

Posted Forumz on 22 October 2015 - 06:50 PM

Shadow Orbs, Holy Power, it's all just fancy names for ''combo points''

It's not interesting at all, especially when they don't even allow you to spend different amounts and you only have one or two abilities that actually generate your combo points, andd those abilities have cooldowns so you can't even decide to focus on building combo points or doing other stuff.

Shadow Orbs is probably the most stupid secondary resource right now. Cast Mind Blast 3 times, cast Devouring Plague for free. They might as well put Devouring Plague on a 20 second cooldown reduced by haste.

#4526067 First legion leaks

Posted Dizzeeyo on 22 October 2015 - 05:32 PM

View PostGelu, on 22 October 2015 - 05:20 PM, said:

No, what you're doing is begging to revert the game to WOTLK in every suggestion you make, just go play on a private server if you want the game to be exactly the same as it was prior 2010
because asking to make the game good again is such a terrible terrible thing

from vanilla we have had 2 expansions going in the right direction, and then 3 expansions all going in the wrong direction, cumulating in wod. we either hope that they suddenly find inspiration for a brand new direction which also happens to be good, or we ask for tbc/wotlk mechanics/gameplay back

when people ask for wotlk back, they don't actually mean they want to go back in time to 2010, they mean they want the game to be fun again, like it was in wotlk

#4525629 First legion leaks

Posted Wertexjk on 22 October 2015 - 12:14 AM

View PostNaraga, on 21 October 2015 - 05:51 PM, said:

Really disappointing to see them add yet another secondary resource to yet another class.

After the horrible introductions of shadoworbs, holy power, burning embers and soul shards (am I forgetting any?) they decided to add yet another terrible secondary resource into the game.

It was interesting on DKs because they were a new class and it was a niche, but this is just getting out of hand now. Especially because it absolutely decimates the play styles of the mentioned classes.

Which becomes even more ridiculous seeing as the primary resource systems in most of those cases are a non-factor.

#4522425 If you beta'd WoD you let us down.

Posted Dizzeeyo on 17 October 2015 - 03:00 AM

Rokmode gets it, as usual - Capma is clueless, as usual

View PostROKMODE, on 17 October 2015 - 02:40 AM, said:

In TBC, many specs were incomplete, and it was really obvious.
Wotlk made most classes flow better and have a toolset that made a good deal of sense, filling in the holes left unfinished in BC.
Cata took weaknesses and filled them, which led to future expansions where everyone can do everything--it set the precedent in a manner of speaking.
tbc - build on vanilla class design
wotlk - build on tbc class design
cata - x class has y weakness,  so lets give every single x class z ability to counter y weakness, wonder what can go wrong with that hehe

#4522416 If you beta'd WoD you let us down.

Posted ROKMODE on 17 October 2015 - 02:40 AM

lol almost every cata spell that was added was completely unneeded, artificially increased the skillcap by just adding more button bloating, or drastically changed the playstyle because it was so fucking strong

knockback immunity on DK
necrotic strike (I don't care what anyone says, fuck this ability, especially in cata)
dark simul when dks already had like 15 ways to stop spells
smoke bomb
ring of frost (yes this spell was a big deal dunno what ur smoking, any ability, including smoke bomb, that completely takes out part of a map is by default game changing)
solar beam (lol)
paladin interrupt, feral interrupt (when they already had feral charge)
the entire system of holy power, and pretty much all those sub systems (eclipse and whatever) (this alone accounts for like 10 abilities
unleash elements (absolutely nobody was asking for this)
unholy frenzy (new spell basically b/c cata made it break cc making it another unneeded spell that had no reason to exist)
starsurge, especially since it turned into an instant burst spell that randomly reset 24/7, boomkin damage was already strong in wrath
frostfire orb, which gave you like infinite fingers of frost
heroic leap- honestly what the fuck, nobody wanted this in place of having charge/intercept LOL, it didn't even work a lot of the time
stupid ass mushrooms which just turned into annoying as fuck desecration
universal dispel (something again nobody at all asked for)
adding bloodlust to like 10 different classes (only really relevant in s9)
Everything they did to the hunter class
strangulate being an interrupt in addition to a silence
ghoul getting an interrupt
throwdown (another thing nobody asked for)
warlocks getting 15 fel doms
warlocks getting an out of combat evocate (WHO THE FUCK ASKED FOR THIS LOL)
Soul swap
MAGE INVIS letting u see targets, basically just giving mages a stealth,invis further reducing the rogue stealth niche (again set a precedent)
revamping combustion from an ability to increased your crit change to ability that  nearly ended the game everytime it was pressed
and basically every singe cooldown, stun, silence, kick that was added that made the game increasingly frustrating to play

when you compare that to wotlk added spells, you get a different trend. In TBC, many specs were incomplete, and it was really obvious. Wotlk made most classes flow better and have a toolset that made a good deal of sense, filling in the holes left unfinished in BC. Cata took weaknesses and filled them, which led to future expansions where everyone can do everything--it set the precedent in a manner of speaking.

Good examples of what I mean:
Shadowpriests oomed like a bitch in TBC (this would have become a big issue as the game naturally became faster) and had no survival cooldowns: Dispersion was added, but it deliberately tied both these weaknesses together, so that if you used it at low mana, you were then vulnerable.
Hex was added because shamans had literally 0 cc, which would have made them irrelevant had TBC continued.
Thunderstorm and roots were added because elemental shamans oomed easily in TBC and got absolutely shit on because they had whack ass survial tools.
Lava burst was added because shamans had EVERYTHING tied to one school of magic which was a shitty design.
Wind shear was taken off earthshock and made a separate ability because it was needlessly tied together, which made the class feel less coherent.

For the uncalled for spells such as penance and deep freeze, they just ended up working really well and made the game fun, but imo at that point, they should have just stopped adding fun spells because that was nearly the threshold. The ability lineup was like ideal at that point, with a few spells such as bladestorm and spirit wolves being a bit too derpy, but for the most part I'd say that nearly everyone will tell you that the diversity was very much there while also adhering to a system of very apparent weaknesses for every spec.

#4521651 Quiz

Posted Voksen on 15 October 2015 - 06:37 PM


- Its really hard to understand what is being asked.

- I'm going to assume this is some variation of searching for a needle-in-a-haystack.  This means known solutions to similar problems of this type (e.g. combinatorial group testing) will apply.

View PostCapstone, on 15 October 2015 - 03:22 PM, said:

you would change all the spells to 120% then change the outlier to 2/3
truly a dizzying puzzle you've contrived here

For starters, you haven't addressed how to find that outlier, so you don't really have a solution and your method is meaningless.  Multiply all by 120% and magically one of them will reveal itself and then multiply it back?  Seems a bit too simple to me as well, so I'm pretty sure he's asking how to find that outlier.  Then again he hasn't really specified a way to test, differentiate or identify the unique spell (i.e. the 80% one out of the mess of 120% ones).


Blizzard has done all dmg changes, it can be done. But maybe there is no 'change all, except for these couple of listed spells here' option built in into the editing program for WoW.
Can only ever change spells all-at-once and/or 1 by 1, piece by piece.

You can't use any sequential 1-by-1 method on n --> large samples.  This includes what I think Capstone's method is referring to.

Finite resources apply and you can't sequentially test/scale each spell for whether or not it is the "needle" in the bunch.

Based on what (I think) the OP is saying, we're allowed access to some kind of way/test to distinguish spells as being in one of two groups:  belong 9999999999999% or w/e). and belonging to the set that need to be scaled by 80% (i.e. the 1-p).

More Notes:

- Given N spells (N > 1), and of those spells, k "special" ones (0 < k < N), what is the optimum method to identify all of the special spells, and how many tests (queries to Blizz's code db) are required?

- This is an instance of a non-adaptive combinatorial group testing problem, with known bounds:

o(k^2 / log(k) * log(n))  <=  t(k,n) <= O(k^2 log(n))

- For the special case of k=1 we get:  log(N)/log(k) <= t(k,N) <= O(log(N)), which is basically a binary partition search.

This requires at most log_2 (N) tests, where each test is a partition of the remaining candidate set into "does contain" and "does not contain" the k=1 special spell.

Solution (Binary Partition Search):

1.) Randomly partition the set of N spells into two groups.
2.) Perform a cheap test on one of the groups to determine if the special spell is in that group.  Can be a simple inspection through that group (although can be done better).
3.) Remove the negative group from consideration and make the positive group the new set of spells to test.
4.) Repeat (1) to (3) until converge (i.e. spell is identified).

This requires O(log(n)) operations in the worst-case.  Which means for N=1E10 spells needing a 120% scaling, the k=1 unique spell requiring 80% scaling can be identified after at most 33 passes through the algorithm.

The type of testing you want would be based on some pass/fail threshold criteria such as: "do the properties of this block of spells sum to some number".

Again its hard to answer because whats being asked is vague.  But this seems like more of a combinatorial search problem then a simple 'multiple and divide' problem.

#4518897 Ban advertisements of boosting sites?

Posted stalebagel on 11 October 2015 - 06:12 PM

actually agree with naraga despite his example being a bit extreme

#4518792 Ban advertisements of boosting sites?

Posted Ayrasaurus on 11 October 2015 - 04:15 PM

like how stupid do you need to be to defend boosting

but then again im the same person who is anti alts saturating the ladder...e.g One glad per each new class per Bnet account (would free up a ton of spots taken by DJpvpmanx, DJpvpmanxo and DJpvpmanyo the human male paladin).

between everyone having 10 of the same class and boosts you get a pretty small bottleneck in players who actually make the top 0.5% of what is already a small community (=

#4518624 Ban advertisements of boosting sites?

Posted Malladon on 11 October 2015 - 01:27 PM

Quick thoughts on this whole mess. I haven't done boosts since early cata, which, when you're in college between skill capped vids and boosts, it was decent money to get through semesters (and beat the shit out of doing other stuff for money). By mid S8 even I stopped asking for money just because I wanted to play with people on a certain server (the game was actually that fun back then </3). And I can totally understand why someone would risk their account in those shoes given how not-strict blizzard was about it, and the potential you had to line your pockets. I never did anything aside from a few glad boosts and helped a few guys with when they couldn't play the rogue, but the truth is that when this all started to become a big thing is when we really had a hand in hurting the game/community in general.

Let me elaborate a bit... boosts have been around forever, we all know that. It didn't really become a huge thing until the end of wrath and then it totally ballooned out in cataclysm. The issue with boosting (for all you guys that have your head up in the clouds about how amazing you are) is that the majority of the arena population will never be as good as you. This isn't the spread from 2800 down to 1500, I'm talking about 2800 down to 2400, the peak of the ladder to the bottom edge of gladiator dipping into duelist territory.

This has been the truth even back when you could go into trade chat and in 15 minutes find 2 guys who could and would play a 20-30 game session at 2400+ just because it was fun. You know, that spooky era before Real ID when we actually found other people in WoW just by talking to them *perish the thought*. You used to be able to do that because before Real ID the WoW community was much more open to just playing with whoever (when's the last time you took your main and just LFG'd some people for 3s? that's basically the equivalent of trade chat partners these days). On top of that, there are legitimately  A LOT LESS people playing the game now. With arena already being a small sliver of the population playing the game, when the game itself shrinks, our population and the community takes a more noticeable hit. Even though we nominally lost less people than the PVE, Solo Dungeon/Question crowds, we had a lot less to start with, and it pushes our community below a threshold that maybe you would consider... active/thriving.

So while in the past boosting wasn't as huge of a deal because we all sort of vanished into the general population (not to mention the fact there was this huge buffer of gladiator/duelist ranked teams playing for the most part below you guys), this isn't the case anymore.

In shorter terms, there are a greater number of boosters active in the arena community now more than ever, and there are less people in the community now more than ever. The result is that boosted teams and toons take up a much larger percentage of the ladder. So to guys who consistently hit glad anyway, don't care about hitting glad, or are part of the of the R1 crew doing the boosts... to most of us it's just life as normal.

The people who we, by boosting, are FUCKING over, are those guys who used to fill that middle crowd, the duelist/gladiator border. Because let's face it, a community of the top .1% spread out over the top 3 ranks in the game (R1/glad/duelist) is a shit ton smaller, and a shit ton less fun than the top 3% of the community constantly fighting it out for a slot. The one thing that I really can't see being argued is that this game is so much more fun when it's hype, and there's no way to get that hype if you're giving the majority of the playerbase that much of a reason to not bother at all.

I could see countering this argument with saying, Well that's the best practice they're gonna get, and it'll help them improve, and for me that would be such a fun game to play against a R1 guy.

I agree to some extent, and when I was still one of the guys trying to break through to glad, I did enjoy playing against boosted teams because holy shit the games were great and they pushed me to be better. I liked playing against the main team so much more though. You know why? When I played against a boosted team I had all the intensity of a top tier match and reason to play my best, but I had the fucking stakes of a -24 because they were starting as some fresh 2k mmr shit. I'm a shitty enough player at the time, I don't need more pressure for me to make a mistake when I'm probably getting read and outpaced on every play already.

It wasn't as big of a deal for me also because I was in high school/college at that time, spending 4-5 hours q'ng arena wasn't a huge deal to me, and getting a good session in when the booster stopped playing was a pretty reasonable idea. For the rest of the world? Even me now that I'm into that horrible RL thing? I'm lucky if I get that much time to q in a week these days, between coordinating with partners, all our schedules lining up, etc. If I'm an on the edge player, and I've gotta risk 3-4 -20's every time I FINALLY get to log in and q up, it's gonna get fucking discouraging.

When I play against the main team the pressure is on them to not make a mistake. They actually had something to lose if they didn't pay attention to me. That not only levelled the playing fields, but also made it fun. On the flipside of that, I totally hated dropping 20 points to some 2400 shitter beastcleave because they targetted my squishy. GGWP

But the problem is those 2400 "shitters" are the majority of the "good" portion of the ladder in the grand scheme of things. The guys who are into the game, watch the streams, get into arena, and want to get better. Like it or not these guys are a big part of what keep the game alive. And personally I love nothing more than playing with guys who have potential, and who actually get into it. If you're discouraging these people from playing, you're encouraging our already shrinking community to shrink even moreso.

Which hey, you have every right to do, it's easy enough for me to stand on some moral high ground now that I have no reason to boost. Even back then I enjoyed making SC videos, doing 1 on 1 training with guys or even doing old school carries more than the boosts (too much paranoia, made it a lot less fun). But the truth is that if there's going to be any semblance of this game taken seriously, and if it's going to have any chance of being a thriving... scratch thriving, halfway enjoyable community as this game makes its inevitable decline, boosting has got to go.

And I would be 100% behind Blizzard taking a strict stance on boosting.

#4518126 Ban advertisements of boosting sites?

Posted Dizzeeyo on 11 October 2015 - 01:02 AM

View Postjaimex, on 11 October 2015 - 12:59 AM, said:

my opinion is 420% more relevant than yours lol stfu and break 2k
after seeing you irl, stuff like this doesn't quite have the same kick to it, its a shame :(

#4517997 has wow ever been this bad?

Posted Dills on 10 October 2015 - 09:14 PM

It's been worse, but probably not this boring. Even though wow is a "pve" game it's still an rpg, PvP (arenas specifically) relies way more on the RPG aspect i.e how well classes are designed, and how they interact with and against each other. PvE is fun based on the environment and that should be the tuning factor for it.

The entire game even for non pvpers (those who just want to feel into their class or w.e) is more interesting as long as classes are designed well - which is why wotlk was so successful, each class felt like you were unique and brought something cool that other classes didn't have (this is completely gone with wod, but it started in cata i.e dispel change, bloodlust for mages - changes made with 10 man raiding in mind, even though the raids themselves could have been just designed differently so that all classes had a role instead of hurting the entire game).

It's just so odd that the game is designed like this even with their intentions of it being a pve game. Ironically, even the whole system of pvp talents seems to be there to fix issues of homogonizations caused by pve, when in reality it would be much simpler and more effective to have pve specific talents that would just let them homogonize classes for raiding.

I care about wow way more than I should, I play way too much and still I'm at the point that I'm sick of it, and it actually isn't because I'm not addicted anymore or w.e (because you could give me any other xpac and I'd continue with playing nonstop and enjoying myself), it's just because everything is way too boring :/ even in other xpacs if you qued into the same team and same comp over and over and over again the match would and could feel different every single time, but now every comp and match up is played the exact same way (hpal wodcomp). I just have no clue what to even do in wow at this point because everything is unenjoyable and boring (duels, bgs, 2s, 3s, 5s, world pvp, dungeons, heroics, dailies, watching swifty videos).

I really wish we could just make the game interesting T_T