
Tree form survivability SLIGHTLY nerfed, OOcaster survivability buffed
#21
Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:22 AM
#22
Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:24 AM
#23
Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:31 AM
#24
Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:45 AM
#25
Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:50 AM
#26
Posted 27 May 2009 - 06:05 AM
#27
Posted 27 May 2009 - 06:37 AM
160% seems a bit too much to be passive, idk
Druids were not weak in S5
Druids weren't weak in s5 at all, some people realized how to play them and beat dk teams, some didn't.
#28
Posted 27 May 2009 - 06:40 AM
Funny thing is, Juggernaut just got butchered
Rofl.
No.
#29
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:00 AM
#30
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:08 AM
the stupid thing about it is that it pretty much kills Dreamtree spec (or w/e you want to call it) because to me imp barkskin seems too good to pass up(if it's passive, anyways)
http://www.wowhead.c...ZZf0IubuxmdA0sb
#31
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:20 AM
#32
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:30 AM
#33
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:49 AM
#34
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:18 AM
#35
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:37 AM
he prolly means
http://www.wowhead.c...oZZf0IubuxmdA0o
w/e you just linked is just flat out horrible.
Edit: 2/3 dreamstate, which just means you lose a lot of regen just for barkskin
#36
Posted 27 May 2009 - 10:05 AM
If it's active, then you might delete the change cuz it helps nothing at all.
Overall, I think Blizz wanted to do something clever, but screwed up once again.
#37
Posted 27 May 2009 - 10:11 AM
If it's active, then you might delete the change cuz it helps nothing at all.
Overall, I think Blizz wanted to do something clever, but screwed up once again.
Exactly what i thought aswell.
#38
Posted 27 May 2009 - 10:23 AM
Basically the same as before cept no weaknesses and mass cyclone spam, awesome
Gonna love playing DK/Druid if it goes through as passive D: pretty sure its not though!
#39
Posted 27 May 2009 - 10:26 AM
#40
Posted 27 May 2009 - 10:41 AM
Edit: From what the tooltip says, i'm pretty sure it is passive.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users