Jump to content

Photo

Tree form survivability SLIGHTLY nerfed, OOcaster survivability buffed


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
230 replies to this topic

#1 Ulali

Ulali
  • Ulaliwuhn
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Bonechewer
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 655
  • Talents: Balance

Posted 27 May 2009 - 01:49 AM

Improved Barkskin: This talent now also grants 80/160% additional armor while in Travel Form or not shapeshifted.


Improved Tree of Life: The armor bonus to Tree of Life Form from this talent has been reduced to 67/133/200% bonus armor.

big deal y/n?
  • 0

#2 korzal

korzal
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Mannoroth
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 117
  • Talents: Assassination 0/2/1/2/0/0
  • 2v2: 1565
  • 3v3: 2441
  • RBG: 192

Posted 27 May 2009 - 01:56 AM

barkskin is a nice buff. only a 40% loss in tree. i'd say its a good change
  • 0

#3 Zanny

Zanny
  • Xanny
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Agamaggan
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 3,164
  • Talents: Assassination

Posted 27 May 2009 - 01:58 AM

CCing once per minute vs dk ret teams isnt that great, but neither is the nerf to ToL
  • 0

#4 ZilQ

ZilQ
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 14
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 27 May 2009 - 02:16 AM

Depends on if the armor buff is just during barkskin is up or if it's a passive caster form armor buff.
Hard to say from that tooltip.
Barkskin as it is is good enough but they clrealy have to do somethign about caster form armor to get druids out of the ToL homping.
  • 0

#5 Belden

Belden
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 299
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 27 May 2009 - 02:42 AM

Depends on if the armor buff is just during barkskin is up or if it's a passive caster form armor buff.


This is what I'm confused about too. If it's passive good bye treeform for the most part.
  • 0

#6 Shouri

Shouri
  • Junkies
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 1,308
  • Talents: Restoration 1/0/0/0/2/2/1
  • 2v2: 960
  • 3v3: 2638
  • 5v5: 96
  • RBG: 1729

Posted 27 May 2009 - 02:58 AM

It's an overall buff, the only reason people sat in tree is because they left themselves too open if they didn't. This practically solves the issue if you have barkskin up.
  • 0

#7 Hunkoffunk

Hunkoffunk
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 192

Posted 27 May 2009 - 03:23 AM

Buff imo.
  • 0

#8 Jorenm

Jorenm
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Spirestone
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 208
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 27 May 2009 - 03:23 AM

If this is just when barkskin is up then I'd say it changes nothing. If it's all the time, I'd say blizzard finally grew a brain.

We literally have no choice at all but to turtle in tree when barkskin is down, what we need is passive survivability out of tree, all the time.

I think tying everything to barkskin is kinda lame though. It makes it less and less viable to not be deep resto. That one talent gives us: An innervate that's usable, the ability to survive double dps, and, perhaps, 100% of our caster survivability.
  • 0

#9 Alkazard

Alkazard
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Frostwolf
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 1,070
  • Talents: Protection
  • RBG: 2229

Posted 27 May 2009 - 03:27 AM

Basically they didn't change anything but made it so druids can CC easier. =/
  • 0

#10 Gladcas

Gladcas
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Korgath
  • Vengeance
  • Posts: 150
  • Talents: Balance

Posted 27 May 2009 - 03:35 AM

please say its passive... please
  • 0

#11 Mulliss

Mulliss
  • Members
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Bronzebeard
  • Cyclone
  • Posts: 296
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 27 May 2009 - 03:39 AM

If we nerfed Juggernaut into the ground (which we aren't going to do), then I think you'd see warriors collapse again.


Funny thing is, Juggernaut just got butchered
  • 0

#12 Mooneternal

Mooneternal
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Nesingwary
  • Emberstorm
  • Posts: 220
  • Talents: Discipline

Posted 27 May 2009 - 03:50 AM

if this is passive, god exists. lol
  • 0

#13 Tiara

Tiara
  • Junkies
  • Worgenclass_name
  • US-Blackrock
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 9
  • Talents: Marksmanship

Posted 27 May 2009 - 04:44 AM

Improved Barkskin: This talent now also grants 80/160% additional armor while in Travel Form or not shapeshifted.

Sounds like its passive :D
  • 0

#14 Sebe

Sebe
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Frostmane
  • Misery
  • Posts: 204
  • Talents: Shadow

Posted 27 May 2009 - 04:51 AM

Pretty sure its passive, if not :confused:
  • 0

#15 Mulliss

Mulliss
  • Members
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Bronzebeard
  • Cyclone
  • Posts: 296
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 27 May 2009 - 04:52 AM

If it turns out to be passive im going to cream my pants
  • 0

#16 caustic

caustic
  • Members
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Black Dragonflight
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 297
  • Talents: Arms

Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:06 AM

Domini you have a new nerf to add to your sig :)
  • 0

#17 tontonba

tontonba
  • Junkies
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Shattered Halls
  • Retaliation
  • Posts: 152
  • Talents: Balance

Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:11 AM

If it's passive, I can now defend all accusations of "YOU'RE A DIRTY FACEROLLER" with, I loloutplayed you in caster form.
  • 0

#18 Sir H

Sir H
  • Members
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Tortheldrin
  • Emberstorm
  • Posts: 521
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:14 AM

y would u go tree if it is passive other than dub dps

gg blizz thanks

if not

f u
  • 0
Posted Image

#19 xietor

xietor
  • Premium
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Nazgrel
  • Emberstorm
  • Posts: 120
  • Talents: Retribution

Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:16 AM

so basically the only thing that could kill me (focus repentance then hoj or inercept in caster) now can't? Cool lol
  • 0

#20 Mackeveli

Mackeveli
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Blackrock
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 725
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:18 AM

160% is too much, and it should not apply to travel form just caster
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<