Jump to content

Photo

MS effect on 3.1 crusader strike


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
166 replies to this topic

#21 Theed

Theed
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Aegwynn
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 379
  • Talents: Shadow 1/1/0/1/0/0/0
  • 2v2: 1784
  • 3v3: 2330
  • RBG: 1630

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:38 PM

No fucking spec or class should be able to reduce spelldmg AND healing from a Target in PvP
thats totaly imbalanced and theres nothing to argue about it
Ret Pallys were at a balanced state.
What would you say if every shadowpriest could reduce Meleedmg and Healing from a target 99% of the time?
that would be overpowered
blizzard dont know how to balance this game
that proves it
  • 0

#22 Devz

Devz
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Talnivarr
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 122
  • Talents: Discipline 1/1/0/1/1/1/0

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:40 PM

wow just wow...
  • 0

#23 domino

domino
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Magtheridon
  • Raserei / Frenzy
  • Posts: 193
  • Talents:

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:40 PM

Right... because meeting keyboard-turning ret at 2100 that smashed my warrior to pieces wasn't enough.

Please rets please tell me to what dev you cry rivers to that they always buff you up.

Current havoc with holy paladins being OP is still ret paladins fault. We just took advantage of it cause the way blizz intends holy paladins to be played 90% pure crap( very defensive healers in a very offensive pvp environment ).


If you would have read some of the ret posts around here. Many of us would love to trade some of our dmg (in pvp that is, i would like to do some pve aswell) for more offensive utility like an interrupt or a snare. Nobody called out for a ms effect. So please don't blame/flame us, it's not helping and it makes you look stupid.
  • 0

#24 Mardur

Mardur
  • Members
  • Dwarfclass_name
  • EU-Shattered Hand
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 72
  • Talents: Retribution

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:40 PM

says holy pala lol


Who plays with a warrior. Don't call me fotm.
  • 0
:paladin::warrior: since season 1

#25

  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Talents: Frost 1/0/2/2/0/0/0
  • 2v2: 2191
  • 3v3: 2603
  • RBG: 1776

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:40 PM

Retributions were decent in s3/s4, and if they had things like freedom breaking stuns etc back then they would have been amazing when paired with a mortal strike class in 3s. I don't see why everything has to be balanced around 2s, and healer/ret isn't exactly a bad comp right now. rofl

yea guys lets just give ret paladins a mortal strike effect when they already do retarded amounts of dmg
  • 0

#26 Vlada

Vlada
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Sylvanas
  • Rampage / Saccage
  • Posts: 3,635
  • Talents: Holy 0/0/1/2/2/0
  • 2v2: 1985
  • 3v3: 2265
  • 5v5: 2416
  • RBG: 2252

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:41 PM

i wonder who tought of this "WHENVER YOU USE IT ON CAST THEIR DAMAGE AND HEALING IS REDUCED BY 50%". Bet some downer dev
  • 0

#27 Magus

Magus
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 522

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:41 PM

man stop joking around u almost gave me a heart attack.
/me checks mmo champ page
......
  • 0

#28 Vlada

Vlada
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Sylvanas
  • Rampage / Saccage
  • Posts: 3,635
  • Talents: Holy 0/0/1/2/2/0
  • 2v2: 1985
  • 3v3: 2265
  • 5v5: 2416
  • RBG: 2252

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:42 PM

If you use that CS effect on healer and his healing target have MS on , do you heal 75% less?
  • 0

#29 Intact

Intact
  • Junkies
  • Trollclass_name
  • EU-Al'Akir
  • Blackout
  • Posts: 126
  • Talents: Discipline

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:43 PM

The stupidity of Blizzard always made me laugh so hard irl.
  • 0

#30 Nemzz

Nemzz
  • Merker
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Defias Brotherhood
  • Rampage / Saccage
  • Posts: 868
  • Talents: Assassination

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:43 PM

nice pala priest will defo counter mage rogue now HEHE
  • 0

Heard wow char. names cant be longer than 12 letters. Ok, i admit im a retard, thinking that wow players might use their brain once in a while is unforgivable.
Also heard that people who are playing in good setups are hopelessly BAD.

So im a wotlk hero, yet managed to accomplish more in 4 months than you in your whole wow career,

Rank 2 0 time gladiator who has achieved bigger and better goals in WOW than you

#31 Pirated

Pirated
  • Members
  • Trollclass_name
  • US-Burning Blade
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 2,261
  • Talents: Enhancement

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:44 PM

no

fucking ridiculous


.
  • 0
"i have literally never, to my recollection, overestimated myself"
-Buddhist

#32 Magdain

Magdain
  • Premium
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Mal'Ganis
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 2,643
  • Talents: Balance

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:44 PM

If you use that CS effect on healer and his healing target have MS on , do you heal 75% less?


Doesn't stack.

rofling at ret/lock/holy in 3.1 though

aoe mortal strike hehehehehehehTHEHEHEHEHEHE
  • 0

#33 Ampli

Ampli
  • Members
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Archimonde
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 76
  • Talents: Destruction

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:45 PM

guys in theory... do you realize that this will effectively lower their dps if they're not spamming it every cd and waiting for casts?
  • 0

#34 Pirated

Pirated
  • Members
  • Trollclass_name
  • US-Burning Blade
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 2,261
  • Talents: Enhancement

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:45 PM

you want an MS effect? then your damage has to be nerfed to the level of rogue/warrior damage

fuck
  • 0
"i have literally never, to my recollection, overestimated myself"
-Buddhist

#35 domino

domino
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Magtheridon
  • Raserei / Frenzy
  • Posts: 193
  • Talents:

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:47 PM

guys in theory... do you realize that this will effectively lower their dps if they're not spamming it every cd and waiting for casts?


Ow wait, somebody who taught about it. Good, now we're getting somewhere. If we use it, you'll probably have to start healing. If we dont you can probably stay up with instants 24/7. And it's still useless on any melee class.
  • 0

#36 Kags

Kags
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 804
  • Talents:

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:47 PM

WE NEED THIS END OF DISCUSSION. Keep discussing anyways
  • 0
Retmage gladiator club!
Xfire:kagunster but i don't stream often

#37 Magdain

Magdain
  • Premium
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Mal'Ganis
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 2,643
  • Talents: Balance

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:49 PM

guys in theory... do you realize that this will effectively lower their dps if they're not spamming it every cd and waiting for casts?


ret damage spikes every 7 seconds without cs. they now have exorcism in pvp. exorcism and crusader strike damage has been buffed 15%

ret paladin damage is up in 3.1 pvp, they now have an ms, and theyre now officially immune to running oom once again.
  • 0

#38 qedqed

qedqed
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Trollbane
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 117
  • Talents: Assassination

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:50 PM

guys in theory... do you realize that this will effectively lower their dps if they're not spamming it every cd and waiting for casts?


Are you telling me that's a nerf?
  • 0

#39 Lysander

Lysander
  • Junkies
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 2,907
  • Talents: Marksmanship

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:51 PM

This is dumb. More 3.1-overpower is.. uhh.. not cool. At least its tied to a main nuke so that they can't just tab and put a 75% debuff up :x.
  • 0

#40 Vlada

Vlada
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Sylvanas
  • Rampage / Saccage
  • Posts: 3,635
  • Talents: Holy 0/0/1/2/2/0
  • 2v2: 1985
  • 3v3: 2265
  • 5v5: 2416
  • RBG: 2252

Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:52 PM

I really doubt it doesn't stack as it reduces your healing done by 50% as healer so if you have mortal strike for example on your partner you will heal 75% less on him
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<