Jump to content

Photo

Paladin 2's and the nurfs.


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Havok

Havok
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Shattered Halls
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 24
  • Talents: Protection

Posted 24 August 2007 - 08:34 AM

With paladins loosing spots in 2v2 and the incoming nurfs to palas, mace warriors (or is that later patch?), and warlocks will paladins actualy have a setup viable enough to reach the top 0.5% in 2v2? I sertanly cant think of 1 .. maybe you can?
  • 0

#2 Conradical

Conradical
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Garona
  • Rampage
  • Posts: 1,586
  • Talents: Affliction 0/2/2/0/2/.

Posted 24 August 2007 - 12:45 PM

I didn't understand your post.
  • 0

#3 Kasarin

Kasarin
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Llane
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 23
  • Talents: Holy

Posted 24 August 2007 - 01:58 PM

I think he's wondering the same thing I am, what is a good partner for a holy pally to contend for gladiator in 2v2 with upcoming nerfs and changes to pallies and mace warriors?
  • 0

#4 Havok

Havok
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Shattered Halls
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 24
  • Talents: Protection

Posted 24 August 2007 - 03:00 PM

Yep Kasarin we are speeking about the same thing.
  • 0

#5 Kasarin

Kasarin
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Llane
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 23
  • Talents: Holy

Posted 24 August 2007 - 09:22 PM

Heh, I've been wondering the same thing, except, the answer might be "pallies are useless for 2v2" after this coming tuesday or whenever patch hits.
  • 0

#6 Havok

Havok
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Shattered Halls
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 24
  • Talents: Protection

Posted 25 August 2007 - 12:16 AM

Heh, I've been wondering the same thing, except, the answer might be "pallies are useless for 2v2" after this coming tuesday or whenever patch hits.


thats what i am afraid of.
  • 0

#7 Duljan

Duljan
  • Members
  • Trollclass_name
  • US-Mal'Ganis
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 49
  • Talents:

Posted 14 September 2007 - 07:24 AM

I'm paired with a warlock currently. I rarely ever freedom him, so that's not an issue. We don't face too many mages either, so BoS doesn't really matter a whole lot.

2263 rating atm
  • 0

#8 Laila

Laila
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Malfurion
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 25
  • Talents: Frost

Posted 16 September 2007 - 08:26 AM

With paladins loosing spots in 2v2 and the incoming nurfs to palas, mace warriors (or is that later patch?), and warlocks will paladins actualy have a setup viable enough to reach the top 0.5% in 2v2? I sertanly cant think of 1 .. maybe you can?



Damn near anything can get gladiator.

It's not until the top 10, maybe 20 that you'll really be prevented completely from advancing by class balance.
  • 0
semi-retired

#9 Amplified

Amplified
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 16
  • Talents: Holy

Posted 08 October 2007 - 02:32 AM

The only Paladins that cry nerf are those who allow themselves to succumb to the wishes of the Man.
  • 0

#10 Xios

Xios
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 73
  • Talents: ./././././.
  • RBG: 2410

Posted 08 October 2007 - 02:18 PM

A warlock is still a good partner.

2257 atm...hopefully we break 2300 today.
  • 0

#11 Sylect

Sylect
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Smolderthorn
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 16
  • Talents: Holy

Posted 08 October 2007 - 03:03 PM

A warlock is still a good partner.

2257 atm...hopefully we break 2300 today.


I was playing yesterday with a warlock at 1930 2v2 rating. I didn't know what to do since it had been a really long time since I had played with a warlock, could you give a few tips? We're going to try and hit gladiator with 2's.
  • 0

#12 ashybash

ashybash
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Thrall
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 8
  • Talents: Demonology

Posted 08 October 2007 - 06:40 PM

I rather play with a warlock :)
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<