Jump to content

Photo

1000 Arena Rating Floor


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1 Vanguards

Vanguards
  • Administrators
  • Curse Premium
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Darkspear
  • Cyclone
  • Posts: 1288
  • Talents: Retribution 0/1/0/0/1/2/0
  • 2v2: 1672
  • 3v3: 2957
  • RBG: 1646

Posted 17 January 2014 - 03:30 AM

1000 Arena Rating Floor

Earlier today Holinka confirmed that only players with a rating of 1000 or higher will be used for determining rewards. This means there will be less Gladiator, Rank 1, and other titles than anticipated.

An example would be if there was 1000 players under 1000 rated, and 9000 players over 1000 rated before this change there would've been 50 players receiving Gladiator.
With this change instead of .5% of 10,000 players it is .5% of 9000 players making it 45 players instead.

Official Blizzard Quote:

' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>https://twitter.com/holinka/status/423930521186336768'] Yes, we will only be considering players with a rating of 1000 or higher when determining rewards.

  • 1

#2 Bigmoran

Bigmoran
  • Junkies
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 1101
  • Talents: Balance 1/1/2/0/1/1/2
  • 2v2: 1571
  • 3v3: 2728
  • 5v5: 480
  • RBG: 2306

Posted 17 January 2014 - 04:32 AM

Aridn wrote a nice blog post about it on PvP-Live:

http://pvp-live.com/...ed-1000-minimum
  • 5

bigmoran | bobrosslol | skill-capped


#3 Eazymothafukne

Eazymothafukne
  • Junkies
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 323
  • Talents: Balance 1/2/2/1/1/0
  • 2v2: 1988
  • 3v3: 2604
  • 5v5: 1152
  • RBG: 957

Posted 17 January 2014 - 05:26 AM

http://us.battle.net...pic/11225543077 seems about right.
  • 0
http://i.imgur.com/L60huZm.png
150k Shield slam avatar crit. ^

Real gamers unite

#4 anad1o

anad1o
  • Junkies
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • EU-Zirkel des Cenarius
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 112
  • Talents: Balance 0/2/2/0/././.

Posted 17 January 2014 - 06:51 AM

http://www.arenamate...le_cutoffs.html no need for calculation by hand ;)
  • 3

www.arenamate.net

Creator & Owner


#5 Oohgod

Oohgod
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Garona
  • Embuscade / Hinterhalt
  • Posts: 55
  • Talents: Shadow 1/1/0/1/2/2/.
  • 2v2: 953

Posted 17 January 2014 - 07:41 AM

Damn, Challenger is now a dream
  • 0

#6 Lapeane

Lapeane
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 316
  • Talents: Survival 0/0/2/2/0/0/0
  • 2v2: 2498
  • 3v3: 2729
  • RBG: 1972

Posted 17 January 2014 - 07:42 AM

The US cutoffs are pathetic ;o
  • 1

#7 Reedztv

Reedztv
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 438
  • Talents: Beast Mastery 1/0/1/2/1/0
  • RBG: 2315

Posted 17 January 2014 - 07:47 AM

The US cutoffs are pathetic ;o

2220 US = 2261 EU confirmed. eu wat a JOK
  • 7

#8 Marshmellow

Marshmellow
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 2650
  • Talents: Windwalker 1/0/2/2/2/1/2
  • 2v2: 2375
  • 3v3: 2440
  • RBG: 960

Posted 17 January 2014 - 07:59 AM

2220 US = 2261 EU confirmed. eu wat a JOK

Posted Image
  • 0

#9 Lapeane

Lapeane
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 316
  • Talents: Survival 0/0/2/2/0/0/0
  • 2v2: 2498
  • 3v3: 2729
  • RBG: 1972

Posted 17 January 2014 - 08:15 AM

2.2 for glad is ridiciolous, u should admit it ;o
  • 0

#10 Tsx

Tsx
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Alleria
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 1866
  • Talents: Fire ././././././2
  • 2v2: 1637
  • 3v3: 2821
  • RBG: 1588

Posted 17 January 2014 - 08:41 AM

2.2 for glad is ridiciolous, u should admit it ;o

and 100 more rating isnt right?ur logic has no logic
  • 0

#11 Lapeane

Lapeane
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 316
  • Talents: Survival 0/0/2/2/0/0/0
  • 2v2: 2498
  • 3v3: 2729
  • RBG: 1972

Posted 17 January 2014 - 09:03 AM

Ya but it will get up to 2,4 probably so pretty semilar to s12 for example, on EU it was 2,4+ then
  • 0

#12 Cutebaby

Cutebaby
  • Junkies
  • Goblinclass_name
  • EU-Daggerspine
  • Cataclysme / Cataclysm
  • Posts: 235
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 17 January 2014 - 12:37 PM

1000 Arena Rating Floor

Earlier today Holinka confirmed that only players with a rating of 1000 or higher will be used for determining rewards. This means there will be less Gladiator, Rank 1, and other titles than anticipated.

An example would be if there was 100 players under 1000 rated, and 900 players over 1,000 rated before this change there would've been 50 players receiving Gladiator.
With this change instead of .05% of 1,000 players it is .05% of 900 players making it 45 players instead.

Official Blizzard Quote:

Yes, we will only be considering players with a rating of 1000 or higher when determining rewards.


Omg, go back to school. This is some horrible maths right here.

First of all, 0.5% of the qualified participants gets gladiator, not 0.05%.
Secondly 0.05% of 1000 is 0.5 not 50.

:confused: :confused: :confused:

Edited by Cutebaby, 17 January 2014 - 12:38 PM.

  • 5

#13 Euerfeldi

Euerfeldi
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Norgannon
  • Embuscade / Hinterhalt
  • Posts: 115
  • Talents: Arms 1/1/2/2/1/0

Posted 17 January 2014 - 04:14 PM

Omg, go back to school. This is some horrible maths right here.

First of all, 0.5% of the qualified participants gets gladiator, not 0.05%.
Secondly 0.05% of 1000 is 0.5 not 50.

:confused: :confused: :confused:

Rep'd for math bashing
  • 1

#14 Niggies

Niggies
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • EU-Archimonde
  • Cataclysme / Cataclysm
  • Posts: 1
  • Talents: Balance 1/2/2/1/1/0
  • 2v2: 1567
  • 3v3: 384

Posted 17 January 2014 - 09:08 PM

WTS Warlock 90 (7x Gladiat 3x r1) 520 Ilvl All mount, Spectral Tiger, Magic rooster etc Alts 2.7+ etc

Skype : poirs41
  • 0

#15 jaimee

jaimee
  • Junkies
  • Curse Premium
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Wildhammer
  • Misery
  • Posts: 3567
  • Talents: Enhancement 2/1/0/2/0/0/0
  • 2v2: 288
  • 3v3: 3281

Posted 17 January 2014 - 10:36 PM

WTS Warlock 90 (7x Gladiat 3x r1) 520 Ilvl All mount, Spectral Tiger, Magic rooster etc Alts 2.7+ etc

Skype : poirs41


10 dollah
  • 0

if you play a disc priest you are not a real human being 


#16 Forumz

Forumz
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Argent Dawn
  • Cataclysme / Cataclysm
  • Posts: 3106
  • Talents: Shadow 2/1/1/1/./.
  • 2v2: 2728
  • 3v3: 2279
  • 5v5: 96
  • RBG: 768

Posted 19 January 2014 - 11:03 AM

WTS Warlock 90 (7x Gladiat 3x r1) 520 Ilvl All mount, Spectral Tiger, Magic rooster etc Alts 2.7+ etc

Skype : poirs41

Best I can do is 5 bucks.
  • 0
Posted Image

#17 Marshmellow

Marshmellow
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 2650
  • Talents: Windwalker 1/0/2/2/2/1/2
  • 2v2: 2375
  • 3v3: 2440
  • RBG: 960

Posted 19 January 2014 - 11:05 AM

WTS Warlock 90 (7x Gladiat 3x r1) 520 Ilvl All mount, Spectral Tiger, Magic rooster etc Alts 2.7+ etc

Skype : poirs41


Do you accept box tops?
  • 0

#18 Schvetolga

Schvetolga
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Ravencrest
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 1069
  • Talents: Unholy 0/0/2/0/0/2/2
  • 2v2: 1152
  • 3v3: 2534
  • RBG: 2060

Posted 19 January 2014 - 12:42 PM

WTS Warlock 90 (7x Gladiat 3x r1) 520 Ilvl All mount, Spectral Tiger, Magic rooster etc Alts 2.7+ etc

Skype : poirs41


5 dorrah sucky sucky
  • 0
Posted ImagePosted Image

#19 Fizion

Fizion
  • Premium Junkies
  • Curse Premium
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 772
  • Talents: Affliction 0/0/0/2/0/0/0
  • 2v2: 1814
  • 3v3: 2101
  • 5v5: 1777
  • RBG: 768
  • LocationAshburn, VA

Posted 19 January 2014 - 02:06 PM

I'd go higher than $25 but warlocks are sooooo boring right now.
  • 0

#20 Adamds123

Adamds123
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 97
  • Talents: Holy 2/0/2/2/2/0/0
  • 2v2: 1186

Posted 20 January 2014 - 12:15 PM

OH dam it I might not get my gladiator title now was hoping it would stay at 2.2k
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<