Jump to content

Photo

Season Three Arena Title Calculator


  • Please log in to reply
117 replies to this topic

#41 Tyveris

Tyveris
  • Premium Junkies
  • Posts: 6,889

Posted 16 June 2008 - 03:49 AM

So wouldn't that mean 8 more people would get glad that are out of the 133 top?

Nope. 125 total teams will be getting Gladiator. Thats what 125 glads means. Now, the 125th eligible Gladiator team is ranked 133rd, because there are 8 inactive teams above them. Make sense?
  • 0

#42 Giantfoamhat

Giantfoamhat

Posted 16 June 2008 - 07:48 AM

How often will you be updating the Rankings and Ratings on the calculator?
  • 0

#43 Tyveris

Tyveris
  • Premium Junkies
  • Posts: 6,889

Posted 16 June 2008 - 12:27 PM

How often will you be updating the Rankings and Ratings on the calculator?

Nightly right now, but probably as often as 2-3 times a day the final days.
  • 0

#44 Drake

Drake
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Drak'thul
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 436
  • Talents: Retribution 1/0/0/2/0/2/2

Posted 16 June 2008 - 12:53 PM

Concerning the rating cutoffs, our battlegroup is one of the highest standing. The cutoff is 2304 for 2v2 atm. Can we expect such a steep rating increase in the next week (~100) or is it prolly going to be lower. We are 2309 atm and will prolly try to push to the 2350-2370 bracket. And does that mean that our BG is one of the most competitive?
  • 0

#45 Prcko

Prcko
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Kor'gall
  • Cruelty / Crueldad
  • Posts: 14
  • Talents: Frost 1/1/2/2/2/2/2
  • 2v2: 1496
  • 3v3: 2013
  • 5v5: 192
  • RBG: 1334

Posted 16 June 2008 - 12:56 PM

I would say there are a lot of wintraded teams there, perhaps im wrong though
  • 0

#46 Spamurai

Spamurai
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Gorgonnash
  • Rampage
  • Posts: 1
  • Talents: Subtlety

Posted 16 June 2008 - 02:32 PM

Is there any way you could include a "time of last update" at the bottom of the page so we can see how up-to-date the great information you've provided us with is?
  • 0

#47 Saery

Saery
  • Members
  • Dwarfclass_name
  • EU-Balnazzar
  • Raserei / Frenzy
  • Posts: 45
  • Talents: Retribution

Posted 16 June 2008 - 02:59 PM

Is there any way you could include a "time of last update" at the bottom of the page so we can see how up-to-date the great information you've provided us with is?


Take a closer look in the "bracket" box
  • 0

#48 Disparity

Disparity
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Hydraxis
  • Emberstorm
  • Posts: 1,037
  • Talents: Discipline

Posted 16 June 2008 - 04:20 PM

Take a closer look in the "bracket" box


lol :/
  • 0

#49 Inimitable

Inimitable
  • Members
  • Draeneiclass_name
  • US-Ysondre
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 112
  • Talents:

Posted 16 June 2008 - 04:37 PM

Concerning the rating cutoffs, our battlegroup is one of the highest standing. The cutoff is 2304 for 2v2 atm. Can we expect such a steep rating increase in the next week (~100) or is it prolly going to be lower. We are 2309 atm and will prolly try to push to the 2350-2370 bracket. And does that mean that our BG is one of the most competitive?


Just means your BG has less 2v2 teams than some other BGs.
  • 0

#50 Eyece

Eyece
  • Members
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Darrowmere
  • Whirlwind
  • Posts: 18
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 16 June 2008 - 09:08 PM

Gladiator rating is 2262 for 2v2 right now. Assuming it stays at this point, what is a "safe zone" for guranteed glad?
  • 0

#51 N'Gasta

N'Gasta
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 9
  • Talents: Frost

Posted 16 June 2008 - 11:00 PM

If it helps anyone estimate the rating increase in the final week, this is what happened to me last season.
3 weeks before S2 ended my 3v3 teams was ranked 18th on EU-Misery @ 2336 rating. However we couldn't play at all after that and teams slowly climbed above us, which lead to us dropping to 53rd spot.

Not sure though but I'd recall us dropping from somewhere around rank 40 to that 53rd during the last day.
  • 0

#52 Zanny

Zanny
  • Xanny
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Agamaggan
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 3,164
  • Talents: Assassination

Posted 16 June 2008 - 11:17 PM

if you want to be safe for glad in 2s or 3s 2350 is a good shot.
  • 0
Dont flame me I burn easily.

#53 Zuin

Zuin

Posted 16 June 2008 - 11:26 PM

Id say 2300 will get glad for 2s and 3s on most bgs... wont lower ratings get gladiator this season compared to last season? Because everyone knows last season that 2s and 3s was compeltely clustered with win traders which made like all of the ratings higher becasue so many ppl who werent good enough to get their ratings up were like 2350 cuz they win traded... so as I asked wouldnt this mean theres a chance that the team rating required for gladiator would be lower since they are much less win traders this season?
  • 0
Thuggish Ruggish Bone.

#54 Dunnoye

Dunnoye
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 335
  • Talents: Frost 1/1/0/2/2/0/2

Posted 17 June 2008 - 03:33 AM

Right now it says in my battlegroup (US-Reckoning) the cut off is 2219 for 5v5, with 30 teams in range. My team is currently 2272(17th) and we're sitting at this rating since nobody good has been playing lately. Are we safe for the season or can we expect the ratings to go up a lot this final week? I've been told S2 none of the standings changed very much the final weeks since nobody played...
  • 0

#55 Chainsawx

Chainsawx
  • Members
  • Draeneiclass_name
  • US-Staghelm
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 5
  • Talents:

Posted 17 June 2008 - 05:40 AM

Right now it says in my battlegroup (US-Reckoning) the cut off is 2219 for 5v5, with 30 teams in range. My team is currently 2272(17th) and we're sitting at this rating since nobody good has been playing lately. Are we safe for the season or can we expect the ratings to go up a lot this final week? I've been told S2 none of the standings changed very much the final weeks since nobody played...


I think that means 10+ teams would have to jump your team in rating without any teams already ahead of you dropping below you in the last week. Top 30 teams will get glad regardless of rating no? Not likely but I'd still be ready to play just in case
  • 0

#56 Bigornot

Bigornot
  • Members
  • Gnomeclass_name
  • US-Maelstrom
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 13
  • Talents: Demonology

Posted 17 June 2008 - 05:55 AM

Less Rogue/Priest on Shadowburn so we can at least have a shot please.

Wtf we're 2120 >.>
  • 0

#57 constantine77

constantine77
  • Junkies
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Nathrezim
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 1
  • Talents: Fire

Posted 17 June 2008 - 06:59 PM

Right now it says in my battlegroup (US-Reckoning) the cut off is 2219 for 5v5, with 30 teams in range. My team is currently 2272(17th) and we're sitting at this rating since nobody good has been playing lately. Are we safe for the season or can we expect the ratings to go up a lot this final week? I've been told S2 none of the standings changed very much the final weeks since nobody played...


it seems there have been very few high rated 5's teams playing in reckoning lately, especially the top 40 or so.
  • 0

#58 Vertrak

Vertrak
  • Premium
  • Posts: 31
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 18 June 2008 - 05:25 AM

this may sound nub. but i have a 1901 3v3 and havn't played in it for about a month, does that mean its an inactive team or is it still active cause i am in it and it has played games this season.
Cheers
  • 0
Posted Image

#59 Naamari

Naamari
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Kor'gall
  • Cruelty / Crueldad
  • Posts: 225
  • Talents: Combat

Posted 18 June 2008 - 08:21 AM

Still a bit confused if ingame ranks do count inactives or not.. my alt warrior's 2v2 team was ranked 31371 in-game pvp tab...? :o
  • 0

#60 Beldor

Beldor
  • Members
  • Taurenclass_name
  • EU-Doomhammer
  • Blackout
  • Posts: 3
  • Talents:

Posted 18 June 2008 - 10:43 AM

According to how accurate you have been in previous seasons would you consider 2297 will suffice for gladiator in EU-Blackout this season? Right now it's 101 in game rank and 35 people would have to pass us out according to your estimates. Is that likely?
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<