http://eu.battle.net.../battlegrounds/
Edited by Zerlog, 19 August 2013 - 05:37 PM.
0
Blizzard need to step their game up
Started by Zerlog, Aug 19 2013 05:37 PM
lol this is unreal rbg #2013
Creating and replying to topics is restricted until you link a Battle.net account with a valid World of Warcraft character.
11 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 19 August 2013 - 05:42 PM
Looks like next season EU arena ladders.
Edited by Claynz, 19 August 2013 - 05:43 PM.
#3
Posted 19 August 2013 - 07:48 PM
People being able to get high ratings in greens is a good thing, shows how skill based the game is if the entire game was based on gear/comp in some weird online elongated rock paper scissors mmorpg.
It would be a terrible game that I for one would not partake in.
It would be a terrible game that I for one would not partake in.
#4
Posted 19 August 2013 - 07:54 PM
Claynz, on 19 August 2013 - 05:42 PM, said:
Looks like next season EU arena ladders.
justchecking, on 10 November 2014 - 11:58 PM, said:
Going to blizzcon looking for a fight is like going to the official wow arena forums for pvp advice :)
Renaissance_Man, on 31 July 2013 - 04:31 AM, said:
If I had a gun with two bullets and I was in a room with Hitler, bin Laden, and you, I would shoot you twice.
simonfra1234, on 25 August 2011 - 08:46 PM, said:
bro you got +rep'd by rapture...
#7
amirdaheat
- Bluestahli
- Junkies
-
- EU-Sylvanas
- Rampage / Saccage
- Posts: 403
- Talents: Shadow 1/2/0/1/2/2
- RBG: 2269
Posted 19 August 2013 - 08:35 PM
blizzard can't afford to ban anyone as long as they are paying a sub fee
#9
Hackattack3
- Kittenslayer
-
- Junkies
-
- US-Darkspear
- Cyclone
- Posts: 1012
- Talents: Destruction 1/2/0/1/0/0
- 2v2: 1609
- 3v3: 1792
- RBG: 2050
Posted 19 August 2013 - 08:42 PM
DrXoid, on 19 August 2013 - 07:48 PM, said:
People being able to get high ratings in greens is a good thing, shows how skill based the game is if the entire game was based on gear/comp in some weird online elongated rock paper scissors mmorpg.
It would be a terrible game that I for one would not partake in.
It would be a terrible game that I for one would not partake in.
^Hidden gem from this thread.
#10
Posted 19 August 2013 - 09:50 PM
DrXoid, on 19 August 2013 - 07:48 PM, said:
People being able to get high ratings in greens is a good thing, shows how skill based the game is if the entire game was based on gear/comp in some weird online elongated rock paper scissors mmorpg.
It would be a terrible game that I for one would not partake in.
It would be a terrible game that I for one would not partake in.
Edited by ROKMODE, 19 August 2013 - 10:45 PM.
Expect bias in posts because
Wotlk is the best thing since sliced bread
Wotlk is the best thing since sliced bread
#11
- Noßlockxx
- Junkies
-
- EU-Outland
- Misery
- Talents: Fire 0/2/2/2/1/2
- RBG: 2573
Posted 19 August 2013 - 10:50 PM
Yarmyxx, on 19 August 2013 - 08:38 PM, said:
and people clearly give a fuck about rbgs amiright?
in fact i like the teamplay in rbgs, and its quite fun, but its just me, im a teamplayer naturaly, except for when im going ham in bf3 with c4 on everything but thats just me.
and eitherway for such a huge scale game there shouldnt be such unnoticed cheating goin on, its kinda like usain bolt atm..
Edit: rbgs prbly more balanced then 3s atm
Edited by Zerlog, 19 August 2013 - 10:51 PM.
#12
Posted 19 August 2013 - 10:59 PM
Zerlog, on 19 August 2013 - 10:50 PM, said:
in fact i like the teamplay in rbgs, and its quite fun, but its just me, im a teamplayer naturaly, except for when im going ham in bf3 with c4 on everything but thats just me.
and eitherway for such a huge scale game there shouldnt be such unnoticed cheating goin on, its kinda like usain bolt atm..
Edit: rbgs prbly more balanced then 3s atm
and eitherway for such a huge scale game there shouldnt be such unnoticed cheating goin on, its kinda like usain bolt atm..
Edit: rbgs prbly more balanced then 3s atm
Creating and replying to topics is restricted until you link a Battle.net account with a valid World of Warcraft character.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users