Jump to content

Photo

Slam buff... WTF!?

slam buff

  • Please log in to reply
244 replies to this topic

#241 Ezyo1000

Ezyo1000
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Mal'Ganis
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 702
  • Talents: Fury 0/1/1/1/1/2
  • 2v2: 1825
  • 3v3: 2333
  • RBG: 576

Posted 16 August 2013 - 09:21 PM

No thanks, a buff to overpower is what we need.


There not going to do it, if you guys have seen anything they have posted about arms its that in pve, OP is so much better then slam that it take priority over everything else, hence why they buffed slam like they did, they are trying to make pve warriors use MS+Op outside cs windows and Slam+Ms with cs up. No matter how much people say whats needed, they wont do it strictly because of How many benefits op provides.

Also if they threw in a SB buff as well as everything else we need why is that bad? they already recognize how swave is pretty much mandatory in pvp hence why they buff the stun duration, and talked about potentially buffing its damage...

You can ask for buffs to talents to give us more variety and have spec specific damage buffs to.
  • 0

#242 Speedymart

Speedymart
  • Junkies
  • Gnomeclass_name
  • US-Emerald Dream
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Talents: Fury 2/0/1/1/0/0/2
  • 3v3: 2168
  • RBG: 576

Posted 16 August 2013 - 10:46 PM

There not going to do it, if you guys have seen anything they have posted about arms its that in pve, OP is so much better then slam that it take priority over everything else, hence why they buffed slam like they did, they are trying to make pve warriors use MS+Op outside cs windows and Slam+Ms with cs up. No matter how much people say whats needed, they wont do it strictly because of How many benefits op provides.

Also if they threw in a SB buff as well as everything else we need why is that bad? they already recognize how swave is pretty much mandatory in pvp hence why they buff the stun duration, and talked about potentially buffing its damage...

You can ask for buffs to talents to give us more variety and have spec specific damage buffs to.

They just need to rework TfB (Again) and buff overpower. It's TfB once again another insane difference between PvE and PvP. They should just toss the entire damn ability out and go from there. It has been nothing but issues since they changed it in MoP.

Though, we could keep it and go back to getting UA procs off it. That'd be cute
  • 0
Posted Image

#243 Covlol

Covlol
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Talents: Arms 0/0/1/0/0/2/0
  • 2v2: 2263
  • 3v3: 2361
  • RBG: 1831

Posted 17 August 2013 - 01:43 AM

They just need to rework TfB (Again) and buff overpower. It's TfB once again another insane difference between PvE and PvP. They should just toss the entire damn ability out and go from there. It has been nothing but issues since they changed it in MoP.

Though, we could keep it and go back to getting UA procs off it. That'd be cute


Qft
  • 0
Posted Image
Lvl 1 Dk Legend Covlol

#244 Thebestlol

Thebestlol

Posted 17 August 2013 - 01:45 AM

They just need to rework TfB (Again) and buff overpower. It's TfB once again another insane difference between PvE and PvP. They should just toss the entire damn ability out and go from there. It has been nothing but issues since they changed it in MoP.

Though, we could keep it and go back to getting UA procs off it. That'd be cute


Their way of giving back the damage of the slam nerf was buffing deepwounds.. back to having no burst without CDs.
  • 0

#245 Speedymart

Speedymart
  • Junkies
  • Gnomeclass_name
  • US-Emerald Dream
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Talents: Fury 2/0/1/1/0/0/2
  • 3v3: 2168
  • RBG: 576

Posted 19 August 2013 - 01:21 AM

Their way of giving back the damage of the slam nerf was buffing deepwounds.. back to having no burst without CDs.

They buffed deep wounds the same time they buffed slam. I assume it was a blanket sustained buff regardless of what they ended up doing with slam, but it's nowhere near enough

Edited by Speedymart, 19 August 2013 - 02:11 AM.

  • 0
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<