Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

Holy: what is our biggest problem?

holy paladin wow

  • Please log in to reply
110 replies to this topic

#101 Kionne

Kionne
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Azralon
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 52
  • Talents: Retribution 2/1/0/2/2/0

Posted 20 September 2013 - 04:27 PM

what are you guys thoughts on bringing back insta FoLs on infusion of light procs?

#102 kubu

kubu
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Thaurissan
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 67
  • Talents: Unholy 0/0/2/2/0/2
  • 2v2: 1367
  • 3v3: 2506
  • 5v5: 672
  • RBG: 2189

Posted 27 September 2013 - 01:57 PM

The biggest problem right now is that priests are broken. Blizzard makes changes with regards to pve because they are retarded
Posted Image

#103 Stncold

Stncold
  • Members
  • Posts: 4

Posted 29 September 2013 - 07:13 AM

View Postkubu, on 27 September 2013 - 01:57 PM, said:

The biggest problem right now is that priests are broken. Blizzard makes changes with regards to pve because they are retarded

This. We're really not in a terribly bad state. If I had to point out any one problem we have, it's how ridiculously easy we are to CC/lockdown, but we're more or less "balanced".

The main problem is that we're completely outclassed. It's a sad day for us when even TSG is better off with a priest.

#104

  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Ravencrest
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Talents: Fire 0/2/1/1/1/0
  • 2v2: 2055
  • 3v3: 2436

Posted 29 September 2013 - 07:50 AM

Palas are best healers with cds, worst healers without cds.Thats why u fit better with cleaves ,thats ur biggest problem.

Edited by Artofmage, 02 January 2014 - 02:23 PM.


#105 kubu

kubu
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Thaurissan
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 67
  • Talents: Unholy 0/0/2/2/0/2
  • 2v2: 1367
  • 3v3: 2506
  • 5v5: 672
  • RBG: 2189

Posted 28 December 2013 - 09:59 PM

problims fixeded?
Posted Image

#106 fearco

fearco
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • EU-Ragnaros
  • Rampage / Saccage
  • Posts: 87
  • Talents: Restoration 2/2/1/0/1/0
  • 2v2: 1526
  • 3v3: 384
  • RBG: 384

Posted 02 January 2014 - 01:15 PM

View PostVlada, on 26 July 2013 - 02:26 PM, said:

Noone said paladin is unplayable. It's just we are so low on healer ladder, and you can replace us with a disc priest in almost any comp. I agree with Zilea, being so CD dependent is so outdated in today's game, we just suck in long games unless you play with some strong support classes which was never a paladin niche
am i the only one who think you can replace any healer with priest ? i feel like its more of a priest problem than a pally.

#107 jaimex

jaimex

Posted 02 January 2014 - 01:21 PM

priests are too op yes

#108 Raak

Raak
  • Junkies
  • Dwarfclass_name
  • EU-Ravencrest
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 702
  • Talents: Restoration 0/2/0/1/0/0
  • 2v2: 1693
  • 3v3: 2124

Posted 02 January 2014 - 01:32 PM

View Postjaimex, on 02 January 2014 - 01:21 PM, said:

priests are too op yes

"We could not find the member whose profile you were attempting to view."

Is this whiny waste of oxygen gone for good? Please tell it's so.
Posted Image

#109 jaimex

jaimex

Posted 02 January 2014 - 01:44 PM

You seem upset :) no, dizzeeyo is still here. My profile is bugged for some reason tho.

#110 Gashgordonv

Gashgordonv
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 3

Posted 03 January 2014 - 02:13 PM

holy owns

http://imgur.com/79tXFfZ

anyone know whatsup with this beacon proc? ive seen it happen before but only time ive bothered to ss

#111 kubu

kubu
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Thaurissan
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 67
  • Talents: Unholy 0/0/2/2/0/2
  • 2v2: 1367
  • 3v3: 2506
  • 5v5: 672
  • RBG: 2189

Posted 06 May 2014 - 11:53 PM

View PostRaak, on 02 January 2014 - 01:32 PM, said:

"We could not find the member whose profile you were attempting to view."

Is this whiny waste of oxygen gone for good? Please tell it's so.

NEVER
Posted Image





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: holy, paladin, wow

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<