Can you come to your senses? Warrior was THE mobility class. Just because they gave mobility to monks and cats doesn't mean we shouldn't have better mobility, because we have far less utility and the above two classes do damage similar to ours.
What is hard to understand?
What ? are you saying warriors never suffered from rots/slows ? ofc they have good mobility, thats because they get kited alot.
Warriors was always good for the damage they put when they connect (also they had MS) and how they could take tank more damage than other classes (def stance, reflect, shield block, intervene, passive heals)
If warriors are not doing good, they need to buff the presure they do, and their survival, not give then a root breaker.
Well fuck this, I dont really care what class is op and what class is not, i just have a warrior and i had a feral, those 2 used to be so far away from each other at roles/playstyle. As a warrior i used to not touch a mage at all in a duel, and then when he makes a mistake i could take 60% of his hp in a coulpe seconds, the duel lasted for more than 3 minutes because i could tank/reflect damage, when i was not able to get to him.
thats how I WANT TO PLAY MY WARRIOR, thats why i rather SEE BUFFS IN ANOTHER PLACES, but thats MY OPINION, I UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING YOU GUYS SAY, but understanding it will not change the WAY I LIKE THE GAME.
Edited by dionim, 25 June 2013 - 10:23 PM.