Jump to content

Photo

Will the hunter be still viable in 5.3 ?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 fluffypopje

fluffypopje
  • Members
  • Posts: 7

Posted 12 May 2013 - 11:30 PM

I am leveling a hunter right now but after seeing the big nerfs he gets, I am not sure anymore, me and my friends are going for KFC.
  • 0

#2 Deadscumlord

Deadscumlord
  • Drjakethomas
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 462
  • Talents: Frost 0/2/0/2/0/2
  • RBG: 1954

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:24 AM

Stick a hunter with the best melee and what ever healer is stupid OP at the time and ur gg.
  • 0

#3 fluffypopje

fluffypopje
  • Members
  • Posts: 7

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:36 AM

Stick a hunter with the best melee and what ever healer is stupid OP at the time and ur gg.


I dont think it will be as OP anymore wich is the point of my thread, did you read all the patch notes about the hunter ?
  • 0

#4 Deadscumlord

Deadscumlord
  • Drjakethomas
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 462
  • Talents: Frost 0/2/0/2/0/2
  • RBG: 1954

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:52 AM

i didnt say hunter were OP.. i said stick them with the most redic melee and the best healer and u will be fine... hunters are always viable.
  • 0

#5 fluffypopje

fluffypopje
  • Members
  • Posts: 7

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:53 AM

i didnt say hunter were OP.. i said stick them with the most redic melee and the best healer and u will be fine... hunters are always viable.


alrighty
  • 0

#6 Poseyx

Poseyx
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Emerald Dream
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 1213
  • Talents: Arcane 0/0/0/2/0/2
  • LocationNY

Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:46 AM

KFC with a shaman should be strong imo, with the spriest nerf that should be a pretty big indirect buff to comps such as KFC and warriors are getting a defensive buff this patch
  • 0
www.Twitch.tv/wushington - Multi Gladiator feral stream

Mrlindv - Youtube channel




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<