Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

Stone Bulwark Totem Real?

Shaman totem stone bulwark stone bulwark totem

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Runsfromcops

Runsfromcops
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Bleeding Hollow
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 8
  • Talents: Elemental 0/1/0/0/0/2

Posted 13 March 2013 - 02:53 AM

So with purge glyph being replaceable, and some shamans using totemic vigor...

Maybe stone bulwark totem can be real against some comps.

Thoughts?

#2 Nerfmytotems

Nerfmytotems
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 121
  • Talents: Elemental 0/1/2/1/0/2
  • RBG: 2007

Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:04 AM

Its definatley useable, but you can purge the buff....

Its stam already got buffed this patch to 10% of your health so somewhere close to 39k at the moment, so if you add the glyph (assuming it stacks) then you would have 55k or so... im thinking the 39k is probably enough..

#3 Korzul

Korzul
  • Junkies
  • Dwarfclass_name
  • EU-Doomhammer
  • Blackout
  • Posts: 370
  • Talents: Restoration 0/2/0/1/1/0
  • 2v2: 2315
  • 3v3: 2744
  • 5v5: 480
  • RBG: 1151

Posted 13 March 2013 - 03:22 AM

It's crap - At best it saves mana mopping up residual dot damage on yourself when not being focused.
As you can't drop it during stuns/silences it's pointless and doesn't come close to a 100k+ smart heal from nature's guardian when you're in trouble.

Also unless they changed it from the start of the xpac the shields don't stack - they just get replaced with the new one so you can't pre-empt shizzle with a prestacked shield.

#4 Xhanon

Xhanon
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Kazzak
  • Misery
  • Posts: 338
  • Talents:
  • RBG: 2280
  • LocationDenmark

Posted 13 March 2013 - 04:14 AM

Nature's Guardian all the way!

#5 Claynz

Claynz
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 1629
  • Talents: Enhancement 0/2/1/1/0/0
  • RBG: 1344
  • LocationNorway

Posted 13 March 2013 - 04:26 AM

Good for dueling thats it ;>




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<