Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

Should blizzard merge all battlegroups into 1 or 2 bigger ones?


  • Please log in to reply
65 replies to this topic

#21 ApplejackxD

ApplejackxD
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 1212
  • Talents: Discipline
  • RBG: 2371

Posted 07 March 2013 - 03:48 AM

View PostSnuggli, on 07 March 2013 - 03:25 AM, said:

inb4 40 teams sharing top 10 spots

inb4 1 of those teams wont be your team
Posted Image

#22 Aniroxlol

Aniroxlol
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 100
  • Talents: Subtlety 1/2/2/1/0/0
  • 2v2: 1858
  • 3v3: 2007
  • RBG: 1923

Posted 07 March 2013 - 04:09 AM

View PostDurial, on 07 March 2013 - 01:55 AM, said:

Or, give "rank 1 titles" to the top 10 teams (or however many battle groups merged into each other) then some other formula for gladiator ranks, that way they eliminate win trading, decrease queue times dramatically and roughly the same amount of people will still get "rank 1 titles"

not a bad idea

#23 fant0m8

fant0m8
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Eredar
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 4336
  • Talents: Marksmanship

Posted 07 March 2013 - 05:25 AM

If there was only 1 rank 1 title, it would be easy as fuck to catch wintraders, but it would require Blizzard actually giving a fuck and perhaps trusting community reports about DDOSers.

They won't do that, because they don't care, so I would like to see more than 1 team get rank 1 because I would like this game to be playable without running into 100% cheaters.

But I think 1 giant BG would be great. Ping should be fine to a central data center no matter where you are in the US.
Bye again! This game isn't fun when you don't know anyone else that still plays.

#24 Snackumz

Snackumz
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 416
  • Talents: Destruction 0/1/2/2/2/1
  • RBG: 2455

Posted 07 March 2013 - 06:44 AM

US West > US East west coast is best coast east coast least coast. eu not even on the map

#25 Dagin

Dagin
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Lightninghoof
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 1508
  • Talents: Beast Mastery 1/0/0/2/1/0
  • RBG: 2049
  • LocationNew Orleans

Posted 07 March 2013 - 06:49 AM

13 total atm they need to axe 3 and merge em or more if need be. They should remove rank1 titles and keep the changes they are introducing for this season. Arena fixed from a competitive stand point balance wise thats always going to be fucked.
Signature removed
"Too Big"- Nerd Vexo
Sorry guys too big
Dale
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=m-gVxKrzb4g
Posted Image

#26 hearthadinlol

hearthadinlol
  • Kaska
  • Junkies
  • Dwarfclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 363
  • Talents: Restoration 0/2/1/1/0/0
  • RBG: 192

Posted 07 March 2013 - 07:36 AM

are you not fucking thinking.. if there is only 1 bg its going to be controlled by the same group of people each and every season?
it would be more corrupt then now
Posted Image

#27 mimmick

mimmick
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Spirestone
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 283
  • Talents: Subtlety 1/1/2/2/0/1
  • 2v2: 1315
  • 3v3: 1949
  • RBG: 192

Posted 07 March 2013 - 07:55 AM

The most retarded idea.

#28 Capstone

Capstone

Posted 07 March 2013 - 11:48 AM

View PostVadren, on 07 March 2013 - 03:30 AM, said:

One bg. If your Internet isn't garbage your ping is going to be <100ms no matter where you are in NA.
so because people with good internet won't be affected too much, people with bad internet should suffer?

if they're going to merge, i think they should take 13 down to 6 (pair a bg with another bg, bloodlust/emberstorm etc. and one triple bg) or 3 (west, central, east)

#29 hearthadinlol

hearthadinlol
  • Kaska
  • Junkies
  • Dwarfclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 363
  • Talents: Restoration 0/2/1/1/0/0
  • RBG: 192

Posted 07 March 2013 - 12:26 PM

View PostCapstone, on 07 March 2013 - 11:48 AM, said:

so because people with good internet won't be affected too much, people with bad internet should suffer?

if they're going to merge, i think they should take 13 down to 6 (pair a bg with another bg, bloodlust/emberstorm etc. and one triple bg) or 3 (west, central, east)

i agree with this, pair a bg with another bg would be a good idea.. cut everything in half and maybe merg some more servers..

Edited by hearthadinlol, 07 March 2013 - 12:27 PM.

Posted Image

#30 Omglockzorx

Omglockzorx
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 295
  • Talents: Marksmanship
  • RBG: 2284

Posted 07 March 2013 - 12:33 PM

View PostApplejackxD, on 07 March 2013 - 03:24 AM, said:

ppl want u dead
you kinda annoy me as well.

#31 Kettu

Kettu
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Dunemaul
  • Cataclysme / Cataclysm
  • Posts: 617
  • Talents: Beast Mastery 1/0/2/0/2/0
  • RBG: 960
  • LocationKuwait

Posted 07 March 2013 - 12:35 PM

lol'd @ the people saying top 10 should get rank 1 title

#32 Ansi

Ansi
  • Premium Junkies
  • Curse Premium
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Argent Dawn
  • Cataclysme / Cataclysm
  • Posts: 662
  • Talents: Protection 1/1/1/1/1/2
  • RBG: 1951
  • LocationCold North

Posted 07 March 2013 - 12:38 PM

Where's Europe

#33 Vadren

Vadren
  • Junkies
  • Gnomeclass_name
  • US-Skullcrusher
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 1575
  • Talents:

Posted 07 March 2013 - 12:52 PM

View PostCapstone, on 07 March 2013 - 11:48 AM, said:

so because people with good internet won't be affected too much, people with bad internet should suffer?

If your Internet is bad then it is impossible to predict what your ping could be and mismanagement by your isp is going to be the primary cause of high latency.
Vadren#1175

#34 dionim

dionim
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Arthas
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 506
  • Talents: Shadow 1/1/0/1/2/1
  • 2v2: 883

Posted 07 March 2013 - 01:24 PM

I always had the ideia that rank 1 should be given by comps. with 1 big bg it could be done.

rank 1 ret/disc/monk - 2200
rank 1 war/sp/shaman - 9001

#35 Wallirik

Wallirik
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Ravencrest
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 912
  • Talents: Affliction 0/2/0/2/0/0
  • 2v2: 2567
  • 3v3: 3226
  • 5v5: 2495
  • RBG: 2592

Posted 07 March 2013 - 01:31 PM

View Postdionim, on 07 March 2013 - 01:24 PM, said:

I always had the ideia that rank 1 should be given by comps. with 1 big bg it could be done.

rank 1 ret/disc/monk - 2200
rank 1 war/sp/shaman - 9001

Yeah man the best sp/sp/sp in the world what a terrific idea.
If only we could all be as extremly skilled as you playing such an immensely cool comp

#36 dionim

dionim
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Arthas
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 506
  • Talents: Shadow 1/1/0/1/2/1
  • 2v2: 883

Posted 07 March 2013 - 01:42 PM

View PostWallirik, on 07 March 2013 - 01:31 PM, said:

Yeah man the best sp/sp/sp in the world what a terrific idea.
If only we could all be as extremly skilled as you playing such an immensely cool comp

we can work it out, they could only count teams that are in range of glad for an example. if you put sp/sp/sp to glad range, i think you deserve r1

#37 Sania

Sania
  • Junkies
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 314
  • Talents: Balance 1/2/2/2/2/0
  • 2v2: 2154
  • 3v3: 2203
  • 5v5: 192
  • RBG: 1852
  • LocationDenmark

Posted 07 March 2013 - 02:31 PM

View PostRegent, on 07 March 2013 - 03:22 AM, said:

You pretend like playing WoW is srs business.
Said Regentlord, the rank one of all rank ones..
Posted Image

#38 Durial

Durial
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Talnivarr
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 885
  • Talents:
  • RBG: 576
  • LocationEngland, London

Posted 07 March 2013 - 02:53 PM

View PostSynkz, on 07 March 2013 - 02:21 AM, said:

Shouldn't rank 1 titles be really rare?  I don't see the point in giving anyone but the actual rank 1 team the title.

Yeah, they should be rare but they'll still be just as rare as they were in the release of TBC. Hence why I said "Rank 1 titles" to the top 10 teams (or however many battle groups were merged together). I'm thinking logical here, there's no way Blizzard would ever in their minds award such prestigious titles to only a few people at the end of each season, they try to cater for everyone, and make the game enjoyable.... for everyone. Many may find that it's unfair, and it will cause alot of hassle :P

#39 Saikx

Saikx
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Ravencrest
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 910
  • Talents: Arcane 0/0/0/2/0/2
  • 2v2: 2137
  • 3v3: 2624
  • RBG: 2184

Posted 07 March 2013 - 03:22 PM

1 West BG, 1 East BG.

Rank 1 only for the team that got on the rating first

cy@

Posted Image

Visit my stream: http://www.twitch.tv/saikx


#40 Kettu

Kettu
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Dunemaul
  • Cataclysme / Cataclysm
  • Posts: 617
  • Talents: Beast Mastery 1/0/2/0/2/0
  • RBG: 960
  • LocationKuwait

Posted 07 March 2013 - 03:50 PM

View PostDurial, on 07 March 2013 - 02:53 PM, said:

Yeah, they should be rare but they'll still be just as rare as they were in the release of TBC. Hence why I said "Rank 1 titles" to the top 10 teams (or however many battle groups were merged together). I'm thinking logical here, there's no way Blizzard would ever in their minds award such prestigious titles to only a few people at the end of each season, they try to cater for everyone, and make the game enjoyable.... for everyone. Many may find that it's unfair, and it will cause alot of hassle :P

Your team wins gold in olympics - You arrive to the prize distribution ceremony - While standing on the podium, the announcer announces:

"Many people found it unfair that only the first team gets gold - so we decided to split the price into 10 pieces and give it to everyone who made it to top 10."

Gratz on logic.



Rank 1 title should be unique, not rare.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<