63 replies to this topic

[lobster]

Quote

I like all these changes, hopefully powershot will 100% hit when target is stunned, I can deal with it being avoidable if you can plan it around stuns.

i want to reiterate that this is in no way good. having to bank on stuns to land a 3 sec stun is the aids.

[Flittig]

lobster, on 23 December 2012 - 11:25 PM, said:

[/background][/size][/font][/color]
i want to reiterate that this is in no way good. having to bank on stuns to land a 3 sec stun is the aids.

Are anyone really using Powershot?

[Shadowtiger]

Flittig, on 24 December 2012 - 12:27 AM, said:

Are anyone really using Powershot?

Only last tier talent I ever use. Crits for ~190k on cloth/leather, if it lands.

[Devion87]

... glaive toss is also bugged nvm

Edited by Devion87, 25 December 2012 - 01:26 AM.

[Rhetorical1]

lobster, on 23 December 2012 - 11:25 PM, said:

[/background][/size][/font][/color]
i want to reiterate that this is in no way good. having to bank on stuns to land a 3 sec stun is the aids.

ever heard of thug cleave? the opener is god if it works now

[Shadowtiger]

Rhetorical1, on 24 December 2012 - 08:57 AM, said:

ever heard of thug cleave? the opener is god if it works now

Knocks them away from the rogue/smokebomb :S only bad thing I can think of.

[Pouncedd]

Power Shot is fun to use if you have the Camo glyph and can get it off on a clothie from the start. After that it's hard as hell to use because the push back is so stupid + how often it fails.

[GrieverZ]

Flittig, on 24 December 2012 - 12:27 AM, said:

Are anyone really using Powershot?

Not like other options are much better. At least IF it lands, its a lot of pressure on an opener from glyphed camo. About the only time you can get it off anyway.

[Pouncedd]

Kind of a small idea but would go a big way in pvp I think for MM, they should change wild quiver's damage back to nature damage from physical. It would help against higher armor targets a ton and not even effect PVE that much.

[Pandamcpanda]

As far as i can see wild quiver is still doing 80% damage to pvp targets. I would rather they change the mastery to pure weapon damage or arp, an extra attack for 9k is terrible

[Pouncedd]

Pandamcpanda, on 30 December 2012 - 08:54 AM, said:

As far as i can see wild quiver is still doing 80% damage to pvp targets. I would rather they change the mastery to pure weapon damage or arp, an extra attack for 9k is terrible

It would still be a small but nice change and help marks out if they did do that. Changing the mastery into something else would be pretty nice also though depends on what it is.

[Shadowtiger]

I'm curious, whats your distinction between 1) situational abilities, 2) cooldowns and 3) rotational abilities?

Deterrence - situational. BW - cooldown. Arcane Shot - rotational.


Blizzard. How the hell isn't Deterrence a "cooldown" in their opinion, and Scare Beast/snake trap/Distracting shot/Dissmis pet/etcetc. a situational spell?

The topic was about hunters having too many buttons, specially situational spells. And deterrence is the ONE spell they come up with when community asks about what the distinction between them is....

[idevpro]

I feel bad about hunter talents, no freedom of choice, still BM will be better and provide much more than other spec, still no fixes for talents ( glaive toss / Powershot ), no other spell than stampede for MM/Surv, blizzard just fucked up hunter in MoP

[Rhee]

have they said anything about the roar of sac bugs?

[Snipin]

Rhee, on 31 December 2012 - 09:29 PM, said:

have they said anything about the roar of sac bugs?

i doubt they even know it exists

[NickyEU]

Shadowtiger, on 31 December 2012 - 03:21 PM, said:

I'm curious, whats your distinction between 1) situational abilities, 2) cooldowns and 3) rotational abilities?

Deterrence - situational. BW - cooldown. Arcane Shot - rotational.


Blizzard. How the hell isn't Deterrence a "cooldown" in their opinion, and Scare Beast/snake trap/Distracting shot/Dissmis pet/etcetc. a situational spell?

The topic was about hunters having too many buttons, specially situational spells. And deterrence is the ONE spell they come up with when community asks about what the distinction between them is....

Since you don't pop Deterrence besides a certain situation.
You don't go "AIGHT IMMA GO FOR KILL POPPING DETERRENCE"

[dirtymoney]

NickyEU, on 02 January 2013 - 03:58 PM, said:

Since you don't pop Deterrence besides a certain situation.
You don't go "AIGHT IMMA GO FOR KILL POPPING DETERRENCE"

you potentially would. you're goin in for a kill but the mage is casting polymorph on you and your hpal is cc'd *~yolo deterrence*~

[NickyEU]

dirtymoney, on 02 January 2013 - 04:34 PM, said:

you potentially would. you're goin in for a kill but the mage is casting polymorph on you and your hpal is cc'd *~yolo deterrence*~

exactly, potentially = situational

[dirtymoney]

NickyEU, on 02 January 2013 - 04:43 PM, said:

exactly, potentially = situational

indeed, thought you were agreeing. but who are we kidding anyway, i know i next to never get an opportunity to use deterrence offensively these days.

[Pandamcpanda]

dont worry guys, if i dont pop deterence ill just die, totally situational!