US gemming resilience EU gemming damage, why the difference?
#1
Posted 07 December 2012 - 09:34 PM
According to Reckful resilience gemming is by far superior, can anyone explain why that is? and if that is truly the case why is no one in EU gemming for resilience?
I'm mainly wondering considering some classes that do low damage, like Affliction warlocks, I'm PvP power gemmed but i'm considering trying out resilience gemming. I'm interested to hear what AJ Thinks about gemming in general - resilience or PvP Power =).
#2
Posted 07 December 2012 - 09:42 PM
#4
Posted 07 December 2012 - 09:59 PM
#5
Posted 07 December 2012 - 10:11 PM
#6
Posted 07 December 2012 - 10:18 PM
#7
Posted 07 December 2012 - 10:26 PM
Nadagast, on 12 November 2012 - 09:19 PM, said:
+5% resil DR however, is very powerful. Let's say you're at 60% DR before, 65% after. That means you're taking 40% damage before, and 35% after. That's a relative damage reduction of 12.5%, 2.5x better than the damage boost. I think resil numbers are deceptive.
5% more damage vs 12.5% more reduction, seems only obvious to gem resilience seeing how it scales exponentially
Edited by stalebagel, 07 December 2012 - 10:27 PM.
#8
Posted 07 December 2012 - 10:27 PM
Minpojke, on 07 December 2012 - 10:11 PM, said:
I know most healers and mages are, but for some classes it's 50/50 like Warlock and moonkins, Blukstack, who is a top warlock, is not resilience gemmed. Bladéy the highest rated on Stormscale is not resilience gemmed.
Feel free to explain though why resilience gemming is the best instead. Also if you actually read all of my post instead of just the headline you would see that i'm mainly curious about warlocks since it's 50/50 there with gemming.
#9
Posted 07 December 2012 - 10:57 PM
#10
Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:13 PM
Ermurazorqt, on 07 December 2012 - 09:34 PM, said:
Http://youtube.com/LordZapple
The God You Once Believed In, Only Better And More Perfect, Godx.
#11
Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:38 PM
#12
Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:50 PM
Now lets pretend the Mage gemmed more PvP Power and the target gemmed more resilience. The PvP Power became roughly 60%. The Resilience became 55%.
Frost Bomb not hits for 160,000, but with 55% Resilience it hits for 72,000. This is not the exact PvP Power to Resilience scale; but that should give you the picture that Resilience = generally more damage reduction than PvP Power's increased damage point to point with full PvP Gear.
edit: In the end you can't just go one way or the other for everyone. If you play a class like Enhance Shamans, gemming Resilience is probably smart since they get trained over half the time. If you play a class like Warriors, it's probably good to use PvP Power against non-Casters and Rogues.
If you have enough conquest points it's probably best to have 2 sets ready. Wear the set depending on if the team is going to hit you or not. However with the upgrading gear factored in this season it's going to be a lot harder to do this.
http://twitter.com/VanguardsTV- Twitter
http://facebook.com/Samk920 - Facebook
http://youtube.com/SamK920 - YouTube Videos
#13
Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:54 PM
Vanguards, on 07 December 2012 - 11:50 PM, said:
Now lets pretend the Mage gemmed more PvP Power and the target gemmed more resilience. The PvP Power became roughly 60%. The Resilience became 55%.
Frost Bomb not hits for 160,000, but with 55% Resilience it hits for 72,000. This is not the exact PvP Power to Resilience scale; but that should give you the picture that Resilience = generally more damage reduction than PvP Power's increased damage point to point with full PvP Gear.
That was a nice example.
#14
Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:55 PM
#15
Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:57 PM
Ermurazorqt, on 07 December 2012 - 10:27 PM, said:
Feel free to explain though why resilience gemming is the best instead. Also if you actually read all of my post instead of just the headline you would see that i'm mainly curious about warlocks since it's 50/50 there with gemming.
#16
Posted 08 December 2012 - 11:21 AM
Vanguards, on 07 December 2012 - 11:50 PM, said:
Now lets pretend the Mage gemmed more PvP Power and the target gemmed more resilience. The PvP Power became roughly 60%. The Resilience became 55%.
Frost Bomb not hits for 160,000, but with 55% Resilience it hits for 72,000. This is not the exact PvP Power to Resilience scale; but that should give you the picture that Resilience = generally more damage reduction than PvP Power's increased damage point to point with full PvP Gear.
edit: In the end you can't just go one way or the other for everyone. If you play a class like Enhance Shamans, gemming Resilience is probably smart since they get trained over half the time. If you play a class like Warriors, it's probably good to use PvP Power against non-Casters and Rogues.
If you have enough conquest points it's probably best to have 2 sets ready. Wear the set depending on if the team is going to hit you or not. However with the upgrading gear factored in this season it's going to be a lot harder to do this.
Thank you for the detailed answer Vanguards
To change my question then a bit - I currently play LSD 2 in 3v3 as Warlock and I get trained by some KFC / Melee cleaves but it varies a lot between me shaman and the moonkin. So i'm not sure if it's worth it to gem resilience when i'm only the target 33% of the times compared to the damage benefits from PvP Power gemming, especially considering Affliction warlock damage isn't the best.
#17
Posted 08 December 2012 - 04:15 PM
You are now blinking manually.
Rizzo, on 07 April 2011 - 04:00 AM, said:
Ayrasaurus, on 18 May 2013 - 04:23 PM, said:
#18
Posted 08 December 2012 - 04:31 PM
Nisslol, on 08 December 2012 - 04:15 PM, said:
This is exactly the kind of mindset that will hold you back.
#19
Posted 08 December 2012 - 04:40 PM
Superkåre, on 08 December 2012 - 04:31 PM, said:
How so? Rather opposite, as I mentioned, there is probably something you could've done to make the match go into your favour, so you work on that and improve, what's "holding you back" here?
You are now blinking manually.
Rizzo, on 07 April 2011 - 04:00 AM, said:
Ayrasaurus, on 18 May 2013 - 04:23 PM, said:
#20
Posted 08 December 2012 - 04:42 PM
ardnut, on 06 February 2013 - 09:46 AM, said:
ardnut, on 02 April 2013 - 09:31 AM, said:
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















































