Why wow is so hard to balance?!
#22
Posted 15 November 2012 - 03:58 PM
Smir, on 15 November 2012 - 01:10 PM, said:
If he's made shit food for 3 years straight and I had no other place to eat, I would probably insult him indeed.
#24
Posted 15 November 2012 - 05:44 PM
Smir, on 15 November 2012 - 01:10 PM, said:
If you paid $25 for a beef filet and there's a turd in your mashed potatoes, what do you do?!
Edited by Kraftyy, 15 November 2012 - 07:13 PM.
#27
Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:08 PM
#28
Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:18 PM
#29
Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:07 AM
You can never expect Blizzard to take you seriously if you just bash them with the entirety of your post. Yes, changes need to happen. Yes, AJ has great ideas. But most AJ posters bash Blizzard and then end their post with, "Shit game, cy@." You can't expect to get anything accomplished with this attitude. It hasn't worked yet so why don't we try a different approach! Commend Blizzard for what they are doing correctly and then kindly and politely suggest changes you think would help the game.
Also, as already said, PvE is a part of the game. Consider ideas that would help arena and consider the PvE ramifications. Are they too great? If yes, consider an alternative.
#30
Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:13 AM
I play warrior and everything seems fine to me.
#31
Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:44 AM
scottsteiner, on 15 November 2012 - 11:18 PM, said:
GW2 Is more balanced than WoW UPON release. It just lacked arenas and teams/rating. It can be done, Blizzard just isn't trying - or the people they have hired are inept that their job.

#33
Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:50 AM
Qlol, on 16 November 2012 - 03:07 AM, said:
You can never expect Blizzard to take you seriously if you just bash them with the entirety of your post. Yes, changes need to happen. Yes, AJ has great ideas. But most AJ posters bash Blizzard and then end their post with, "Shit game, cy@." You can't expect to get anything accomplished with this attitude. It hasn't worked yet so why don't we try a different approach! Commend Blizzard for what they are doing correctly and then kindly and politely suggest changes you think would help the game.
Also, as already said, PvE is a part of the game. Consider ideas that would help arena and consider the PvE ramifications. Are they too great? If yes, consider an alternative.
someone never played league of legends
You are now blinking manually.
Rizzo, on 07 April 2011 - 04:00 AM, said:
Ayrasaurus, on 18 May 2013 - 04:23 PM, said:
#34
Posted 16 November 2012 - 08:38 AM
Danücsmlan, on 16 November 2012 - 03:13 AM, said:
I play warrior and everything seems fine to me.
Qlol, on 16 November 2012 - 03:07 AM, said:
You can never expect Blizzard to take you seriously if you just bash them with the entirety of your post. Yes, changes need to happen. Yes, AJ has great ideas. But most AJ posters bash Blizzard and then end their post with, "Shit game, cy@." You can't expect to get anything accomplished with this attitude. It hasn't worked yet so why don't we try a different approach! Commend Blizzard for what they are doing correctly and then kindly and politely suggest changes you think would help the game.
Also, as already said, PvE is a part of the game. Consider ideas that would help arena and consider the PvE ramifications. Are they too great? If yes, consider an alternative.
When you've been promised and waiting for years that the game will be fixed, and pvp will be fine, and you see it actually goes worse, than you have nothing to do but this, after having done many threads on battle.net forums giving ideas discussing why class x is god and class y is shit. etc
Dota is more balanced btw, any dota game has 100+ heroes. Dont tell me wow is hard to balance because actually it is not if you have a very little amount of intelligence.
#35
Posted 16 November 2012 - 08:42 AM
#36
Posted 16 November 2012 - 08:44 AM
Regent, on 15 November 2012 - 04:30 PM, said:
It is true... It's basically 5% if the playerbase who only play PvP and no PvE at all. People who quit because the PvP is bad. I for one don't give a damn about classbalance and you shouldn't unless you are like some people on this forum and play it on a tournament level with cash prices involved.
I'm just so sick of all the whiners out there, even with bad balance you can still play and a have a good time and what the heck is so bad about re-rolling for one season if you feel you absolutely can't play your own class?
#38
Posted 17 November 2012 - 11:23 AM
#39
Posted 17 November 2012 - 12:58 PM
Regent, on 16 November 2012 - 03:44 AM, said:
Blizz isn't trying but GW2 isn't balanced either.
#40
Posted 17 November 2012 - 01:18 PM
Take a look at some of the most commonly complained about things in the last few seasons. Off the top of my head: Resto Shaman cleansing/burst healing, Rogue control, too many silences/stuns, too much instant CC, Warrior one-shotting stuff, instant hungering cold, etc etc. None of that has really any influence on PVE. When Resto Shamans were OP in PVP for Cataclysm, they were also the quote-unquote worst PVE healer. And sure rogues could keep a player locked down almost indefinitely in seasons 9-11, but what advantage did that give them in PVE? Stuns don't work on bosses.
And then for the specs that would get absurdly high burst capabilities (warriors, mages) -- being able to "burst" something down in PVE is not very important as what really matters is your overall DPS, 99% of the time. Burst damage could have easily been tweaked in favor of sustain and nobody would have really cared aside from the pre-teens that wouldn't see as big of numbers and would take their angst to the forums.
Fast forward to MoP and you have an even HIGHER amount of CC and silences, and again -- these spells are very rarely even applicable in PVE, especially raids. Overall, PVEers don't really care if the Shadow Priest blanket silence is 5 seconds long or 3 seconds long. It's really only the PVPers that do. Now obviously there are some PVE things that DO fuck with PVP, such as raid gear, but saying PVE is the main reason why WoW PVP is imbalanced is to me extremely inaccurate.
It comes down to developer incompetence, ignorance, or apathy. Or all three.
Fourreur said:
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










































