Is he wt?
#21
Posted 13 November 2012 - 11:29 AM
#22
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:16 PM
Seems to work pretty good besides a few characters that "Can't be found".
Edited by drmongrel, 13 November 2012 - 12:19 PM.
#23
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:27 PM
You can check.
http://eu.battle.net...scale/5v5/brah/
And my team
http://eu.battle.net.../vindi best bg/
Its easy to see since when you AFK out when u wintraded the team gets a loss, thats why the traders got negative w/l'
So i guess if you Qued up against traders you will get a yes aswell
#24
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:30 PM
#25
#27
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:44 PM
Edited by TteSPORTSDoomsen, 13 November 2012 - 12:44 PM.
#28
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:53 PM
TteSPORTSDoomsen, on 13 November 2012 - 12:44 PM, said:
Actually I dont know, thought it was /Afk Ive just noticed teams left before it even started
#30
Posted 13 November 2012 - 01:04 PM
To avoid errors, I've update my script to return players with ONLY use /afk exploit.
The "real" wintraders will return a "No", and teams which play against /afk (and never /afk) will be return as "No" too.
Is it clear?
#31
Posted 13 November 2012 - 01:16 PM
Almost every teams at 2000+ have wintraded on purpose or indirectly in any case, so.
Edited by Bonjourhihi, 13 November 2012 - 01:21 PM.
#32
Posted 13 November 2012 - 01:17 PM
#33
Posted 13 November 2012 - 01:49 PM
#35
Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:02 PM
TteSPORTSDoomsen, on 13 November 2012 - 12:44 PM, said:
#36
Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:12 PM
sibellx, on 13 November 2012 - 12:27 PM, said:
You can check.
http://eu.battle.net...scale/5v5/brah/
And my team
http://eu.battle.net.../vindi best bg/
Its easy to see since when you AFK out when u wintraded the team gets a loss, thats why the traders got negative w/l'
So i guess if you Qued up against traders you will get a yes aswell
Either this is wrong, or the site decides wrong. I put in people who indirectly wintraded and they all came back as no.

#37
Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:58 PM
Regent, on 13 November 2012 - 04:12 PM, said:
Cant confirm that tho but he did redo the script so that basically only ppl who did the /AFK abuse got the "Yes"
#38
Posted 13 November 2012 - 05:10 PM
#40
Posted 13 November 2012 - 09:31 PM
2012?
coincidence?
i think not
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








































