Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

DDOSing bads


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
33 replies to this topic

#21 averagepriestz

averagepriestz
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Shattered Hand
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 772
  • Talents: Holy

Posted 19 October 2012 - 09:10 PM

You could ban them on AJ atleast.

#22 Bailamosx

Bailamosx
  • Junkies
  • Gnomeclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 352
  • Talents: Assassination 1/2/2/2/0/1/.
  • 2v2: 1347
  • 5v5: 2645
  • RBG: 2526
  • LocationUnder the freeway.

Posted 19 October 2012 - 09:15 PM

There is plenty Blizzard can do about this, it's going to take someone to force their hand with legal action before anything happens. Money talks.

Also, threads like these are valuable if they provide worthy evidence Skype logs or screenshots of the DDOSer bragging like an idiot. It lets us know as a community who to alienate, blacklist and NOT play with. And it helps deter further DDOSing by at the very least incurring a social reputation penalty in this game.

Edited by Bailamosx, 19 October 2012 - 09:16 PM.


Bailamos / World's R1 RBG Leader


http://rbgs.tv/

Posted Image Posted Image

#23 Ecliptium

Ecliptium
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 41
  • Talents: Assassination 2/2/2/1/0/.

Posted 19 October 2012 - 09:42 PM

View PostBailamosx, on 19 October 2012 - 09:15 PM, said:

There is plenty Blizzard can do about this, it's going to take someone to force their hand with legal action before anything happens. Money talks.

Also, threads like these are valuable if they provide worthy evidence Skype logs or screenshots of the DDOSer bragging like an idiot. It lets us know as a community who to alienate, blacklist and NOT play with. And it helps deter further DDOSing by at the very least incurring a social reputation penalty in this game.

Yes, sort of like the social reputation penalty incurred by players who are openly known to buy arena rating and partake in other suspicious activity that is frowned upon...

#24 Unseenz

Unseenz
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 19 October 2012 - 09:53 PM

View PostEcliptium, on 19 October 2012 - 09:42 PM, said:

Yes, sort of like the social reputation penalty incurred by players who are openly known to buy arena rating and partake in other suspicious activity that is frowned upon...

Why is there a social reputation penalty for this? There's absolutely no one that's public about buying rating, and if it is "open" as you say then that is due to the fault of a. word getting out due to the scumbag friends of the buyer or b. an unorthodox, immature carrier that thinks its funny to spread around information pertaining to who they've sold to. call me the devil's advocate for even taking the side of rating dealers and/or thinking of it from their perspective, but if the information is out there that someone bought it's probably not their fault. And there are good players that buy rating too. Just like how there are good players that pay for websites like next level pvp and skill capped. It's just nice that they can have a headstart with t2 or "fake ratings" that allow them to play with higher rated players and get better at a quicker pace.

#25 Lzrguns

Lzrguns
  • Junkies
  • Draeneiclass_name
  • US-Ner'zhul
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 11
  • Talents: Protection

Posted 20 October 2012 - 06:37 AM

Makx has never been above 2200 on a mage. Someone played his account for anything above 2200+, therefore his arena exp on mage is severely lacking.  Unless miraculously ( this didnt happen) he got better then it's all the proof you need that he's ddosing people to climb rating

Edited by Lzrguns, 20 October 2012 - 06:38 AM.


#26 Regent

Regent

Posted 20 October 2012 - 07:10 AM

View PostEcliptium, on 19 October 2012 - 09:42 PM, said:

Yes, sort of like the social reputation penalty incurred by players who are openly known to buy arena rating and partake in other suspicious activity that is frowned upon...

Playing Rogue/Lock/Spriest/Rsham/Rsham in s11 was possibly suspicious and definitely frowned upon.

Edited by Regent, 20 October 2012 - 07:10 AM.


#27 big_gay_roy_69

big_gay_roy_69
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Frostmourne
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 68
  • Talents: Beast Mastery 1/0/0/0/2/0
  • RBG: 2327

Posted 20 October 2012 - 08:13 AM

guys shut up please

#28 Pawzz

Pawzz
  • Content Editors
  • Curse Premium
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 2437
  • Talents: Beast Mastery
  • LocationAustria

Posted 20 October 2012 - 09:19 AM

View Postaveragepriestz, on 19 October 2012 - 09:10 PM, said:

You could ban them on AJ atleast.
That could work

#29 Justwoo

Justwoo
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 504
  • Talents: Discipline 2/2/1/1/2/2

Posted 20 October 2012 - 09:48 AM

gayhutner has spoken
Posted Image

#30 mimmick

mimmick
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Spirestone
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 287
  • Talents: Subtlety 1/1/2/2/0/1
  • 2v2: 1315
  • 3v3: 1949
  • RBG: 192

Posted 20 October 2012 - 11:32 AM

View PostBailamosx, on 19 October 2012 - 09:15 PM, said:

There is plenty Blizzard can do about this, it's going to take someone to force their hand with legal action before anything happens. Money talks.

Also, threads like these are valuable if they provide worthy evidence Skype logs or screenshots of the DDOSer bragging like an idiot. It lets us know as a community who to alienate, blacklist and NOT play with. And it helps deter further DDOSing by at the very least incurring a social reputation penalty in this game.


why are you saying something your team is like the most known ddosers

#31 Athlete

Athlete
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Mal'Ganis
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 472
  • Talents: Retribution 1/0/2/1/2/0
  • 2v2: 288
  • 3v3: 2167
  • 5v5: 862
  • RBG: 2364

Posted 21 October 2012 - 05:54 PM

View Postmimmick, on 20 October 2012 - 11:32 AM, said:

why are you saying something your team is like the most known ddosers

This isn't completely true.  As many times as I've played with and against Bailamos, we've never had any issues with ddos even though all of our skypes were completely available to him.  I'll list some names here that are frequently involved in ddosing:

Poppychulo / Eleqtriq
Shiftyx / Cosherz
Refz
Hybrox
Grimlust
Stormshiftx

These are names that I can think of off of the top of my head without looking through screenshots, because they are always in groups together.
Posted Image

#32 hurrdurr

hurrdurr
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Thorium Brotherhood
  • Vengeance
  • Posts: 100
  • Talents: Destruction 1/2/2/1/2/1

Posted 21 October 2012 - 08:19 PM

View PostUnseenz, on 19 October 2012 - 09:53 PM, said:

Why is there a social reputation penalty for this? There's absolutely no one that's public about buying rating, and if it is "open" as you say then that is due to the fault of a. word getting out due to the scumbag friends of the buyer or b. an unorthodox, immature carrier that thinks its funny to spread around information pertaining to who they've sold to.

Bailamos is open about it, rofl.  He is also open about using some shitty tool to DDoS that never outputs more than 100mbps.

Edited by hurrdurr, 21 October 2012 - 08:19 PM.


#33 Karvinen

Karvinen
  • Junkies
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 80
  • Talents: Holy 2/1/1/1/2/1
  • RBG: 2486

Posted 21 October 2012 - 09:50 PM

View PostAthlete, on 21 October 2012 - 05:54 PM, said:

This isn't completely true.  As many times as I've played with and against Bailamos, we've never had any issues with ddos even though all of our skypes were completely available to him.  I'll list some names here that are frequently involved in ddosing:

Poppychulo / Eleqtriq
Shiftyx / Cosherz
Refz
Hybrox
Grimlust
Stormshiftx

These are names that I can think of off of the top of my head without looking through screenshots, because they are always in groups together.


#34 Ecliptium

Ecliptium
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 41
  • Talents: Assassination 2/2/2/1/0/.

Posted 21 October 2012 - 10:16 PM

View PostRegent, on 20 October 2012 - 07:10 AM, said:

Playing Rogue/Lock/Spriest/Rsham/Rsham in s11 was possibly suspicious and definitely frowned upon.

We mainly used a resto druid in place of one of the shamans. A "RESTO DRUID". How is this suspicious, and why would it be frowned upon?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<