Posted 15 September 2012 - 09:18 PM
i was going to post that but i wanted to minimize the risk of somebody being like "no beast cleave was harder, let me invalidate your entire post"
like beast cleave was a reaction to rmp? that doesn't make it any less braindead
Well considering that if you don't play one of those classes ( ) any comp you'll play will always be considered braindead, i don't really give a fuck. Funny how i've seen shitty 1800 players get 2k2+ as rls too. Aparently having a handful of comps dominating the ladders is better than having people try new stuff.
I'm sure fighting 3dps as a Warlock was as fun as fighting any lock/sham team was as a standard Hunter comp and you don't see me constantly crying here.
Posted 15 September 2012 - 11:23 PM
What ISN'T a "cleave" nowadays, except the above classes/comps? I even saw some people call PHD a melee cleave.
Warlocks always did a great job at that.
Posted 15 September 2012 - 11:29 PM
SL/SL in BC, Destro in WolTK, Lock/Sham/X in Cata?
Posted 16 September 2012 - 06:52 AM
Posted 16 September 2012 - 04:47 PM
Posted 16 September 2012 - 05:49 PM
I've recently returned to the game and found that tripple dps teams are capable of high rating in 3v3 bracket. However every single time I see somebody talking about 3 dps teams he claims its a bad thing.
Could somebody please explain why is the "trip dps scum" attitude is going on atm? Is the trip dps thing considered unfair by all highly experienced players/rats?
Thanks for the answers.
People like you, I want to punch in the face!
Posted 16 September 2012 - 06:53 PM
Regardless, the skill floor is fairly low, but the composition also doesn't really allow the players running it to "outskill" the other team.
What Dusknoir said though fits in well on the EU realms.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: 3v3, arena, tripple dps
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users