Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

Is 2400+ the new "pro" standard for 3v3?


  • Please log in to reply
87 replies to this topic

#1 HowlingBlastyo

HowlingBlastyo
  • Vanille
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 155
  • Talents: Frost
  • RBG: 2026

Posted 25 August 2012 - 07:25 AM

I'm just curious after looking at the ladders, if from now on, you hit 2400+ in 3s from S11 and onward LEGIT playing (no wintrading or feeds) are you considered a great player?

By US standards anyways.

Edited by HowlingBlastyo, 25 August 2012 - 07:26 AM.


#2 mukuld50

mukuld50
  • Junkies
  • Dwarfclass_name
  • US-Magtheridon
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 720
  • Talents: Elemental ./././././.
  • RBG: 2666

Posted 25 August 2012 - 07:27 AM

View PostHowlingBlastyo, on 25 August 2012 - 07:25 AM, said:

I'm just curious after looking at the ladders, if from now on, you hit 2400+ in 3s from S11 and onward LEGIT playing (like me) are you considered a great player?

By US standards anyways.

I did not armory you, but does this "legit" playing include triple DPS?

#3 HowlingBlastyo

HowlingBlastyo
  • Vanille
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 155
  • Talents: Frost
  • RBG: 2026

Posted 25 August 2012 - 07:31 AM

View Postmukuld50, on 25 August 2012 - 07:27 AM, said:



I did not armory you, but does this "legit" playing include triple DPS?
Any comp

#4 Seu

Seu
  • Junkies
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 1435
  • Talents: Discipline

Posted 25 August 2012 - 08:01 AM

View PostHowlingBlastyo, on 25 August 2012 - 07:31 AM, said:

Any comp

doesnt work like that

#5 wodeta

wodeta

Posted 25 August 2012 - 08:16 AM

I`do say 2400+ as RMP, MLS, LSD, Splay, Scleave, RPS etc they are good players, but like RLS, Triple dps, Vanguards cleave and generical meele cleave like Hit Cleave, Smokebomb cleave etc are just retards
Posted Image

#6 Itsnel

Itsnel
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Aegwynn
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 387
  • Talents: Unholy 0/0/2/0/0/0
  • RBG: 2469

Posted 25 August 2012 - 08:32 AM

View Postwodeta, on 25 August 2012 - 08:16 AM, said:

I`do say 2400+ as RMP, MLS, LSD, Splay, Scleave, RPS etc they are good players, but like RLS, Triple dps, Vanguards cleave and generical meele cleave like Hit Cleave, Smokebomb cleave etc are just retards

i love such statements as if casters would take any more skill to play then melees

Edited by Itsnel, 25 August 2012 - 08:33 AM.


#7 Saradave

Saradave
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 99
  • Talents: Retribution 1/2/2/1/0/1
  • RBG: 1343

Posted 25 August 2012 - 08:54 AM

If you're not playing an RMPLS Class sure
Posted Image

#8 Jackow

Jackow
  • Junkies
  • Draeneiclass_name
  • US-Darkspear
  • Cyclone
  • Posts: 876
  • Talents: Restoration 0/2/1/1/0/.

Posted 25 August 2012 - 09:05 AM

View Postwodeta, on 25 August 2012 - 08:16 AM, said:

I`do say 2400+ as RMP, MLS, LSD, Splay, Scleave, RPS etc they are good players, but like RLS, Triple dps, Vanguards cleave and generical meele cleave like Hit Cleave, Smokebomb cleave etc are just retards
Did you really just put shadow cleave in the same category as rmp, mls, lsd, splay and rps? Lol this isn't season 9 shadow cleave is dog shit on live

And to answer the op, no I don't think a single person on aj thinks you're good triple dps scum.

Edited by Jackow, 25 August 2012 - 09:06 AM.


#9 big_gay_roy_69

big_gay_roy_69
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Frostmourne
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 67
  • Talents: Beast Mastery 1/0/0/0/2/0
  • RBG: 2327

Posted 25 August 2012 - 09:07 AM

no a lot of 2400+ players are genuine retards, not to mention carries etc.
play with a player or against and assess their skill using your eyes. not sure about the past but rating is the worst snapshot of someone's player skill this season.  This thread is just gonna be a big cesspool of 'if you played my comp youre good but if you didnt youre probably bad" shit so yeah you should really take everything people say with a grain of salt on this site

Edited by big_gay_roy_69, 25 August 2012 - 09:55 AM.


#10 hertzuk

hertzuk
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 1502
  • Talents: Affliction
  • RBG: 2615
  • LocationUK

Posted 25 August 2012 - 09:08 AM

View PostJackow, on 25 August 2012 - 09:05 AM, said:

Did you really just put shadow cleave in the same category as rmp, mls, lsd, splay and rps? Lol this isn't season 9 shadow cleave is dog shit on live

And to answer the op, no I don't think a single person on aj thinks you're good triple dps scum.


hence, if they reached 2.4k as scleave they're good players?


I disagree anyway, 2.4k is easy on some BG's, harder on others. If you get gladiator legitimately and with a non-dribble comp, then you're a 'good' player. Whether the glad cutoff be 2.4k or 2.5k. At least on most bg's it's well above 2.4, therefore 2.4 is duelist, and therefore you're still a bad player if you're at that rating.

Posted Image


#11 Jackow

Jackow
  • Junkies
  • Draeneiclass_name
  • US-Darkspear
  • Cyclone
  • Posts: 876
  • Talents: Restoration 0/2/1/1/0/.

Posted 25 August 2012 - 09:15 AM

View Posthertzuk, on 25 August 2012 - 09:08 AM, said:

hence, if they reached 2.4k as scleave they're good players?

I didn't say that. Ratings don't always reflect skill considering a lot of players (especially 1 time glads) get to their rating due to lucky qs. If you can consistently get high ratings running more than just fotm comps you're probably good. The point I was making is that all the comps he listed are considerably easier to get higher ratings with than shadow cleave.

#12 Venoma

Venoma
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 51
  • Talents: Destruction 0/2/2/2/2/1
  • RBG: 2218

Posted 25 August 2012 - 10:00 AM

View Postwodeta, on 25 August 2012 - 08:16 AM, said:

I`do say 2400+ as RMP, MLS, LSD, Splay, Scleave, RPS etc they are good players, but like RLS, Triple dps, Vanguards cleave and generical meele cleave like Hit Cleave, Smokebomb cleave etc are just retards

lol

#13 Justwoo

Justwoo
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 492
  • Talents: Discipline 2/2/1/1/2/2

Posted 25 August 2012 - 11:04 AM

honestly depends on the size of the litter box imo
Posted Image

#14 Jacob_a

Jacob_a
  • Members
  • Posts: 396

Posted 25 August 2012 - 11:09 AM

View Posthertzuk, on 25 August 2012 - 09:08 AM, said:

hence, if they reached 2.4k as scleave they're good players?


I disagree anyway, 2.4k is easy on some BG's, harder on others. If you get gladiator legitimately and with a non-dribble comp, then you're a 'good' player. Whether the glad cutoff be 2.4k or 2.5k. At least on most bg's it's well above 2.4, therefore 2.4 is duelist, and therefore you're still a bad player if you're at that rating.

Duelists are only bad players when compared to multiglads. You speak as if any duelist is a bad player by default.

That's like being a billionaire and calling multi-millionaires poor.

You suck.

#15 Cres

Cres
  • Junkies
  • Dwarfclass_name
  • EU-Ravencrest
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 335
  • Talents: Restoration 0/0/1/1/0/.

Posted 25 August 2012 - 11:17 AM

Uh, I think that someone is good when I play against them and feel they played good regardless of comp and rating. You simply can't draw a line at X and say everyone below this suck and everyone above it are gods.

#16 big_gay_roy_69

big_gay_roy_69
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Frostmourne
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 67
  • Talents: Beast Mastery 1/0/0/0/2/0
  • RBG: 2327

Posted 25 August 2012 - 11:18 AM

View PostJustwoo, on 25 August 2012 - 11:04 AM, said:

honestly depends on the size of the litter box imo
do you even bread?

#17 lilpe

lilpe
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 122
  • Talents: Enhancement 0/0/2/2/0/0
  • RBG: 384

Posted 25 August 2012 - 11:27 AM

View Postwodeta, on 25 August 2012 - 08:16 AM, said:

I`do say 2400+ as RMP, MLS, LSD, Splay, Scleave, RPS etc they are good players, but like RLS, Triple dps, Vanguards cleave and generical meele cleave like Hit Cleave, Smokebomb cleave etc are just retards


I got a feeling u dont know what to when u get trained by melees :)
http://www.twitch.tv/lilpelilpe streaming arenas on daily basis. Dont forget to click follow
http://www.youtube.com/lilpelilpe just started to fraps arenas

#18 Durial

Durial
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Talnivarr
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 885
  • Talents:
  • RBG: 576
  • LocationEngland, London

Posted 25 August 2012 - 12:05 PM

Are you indirectly asking us if you're a great player ?

2.4k is a random benchmark. But no, personally I'd say 2451 is where you need to be, below that people can stay small =)

#19 Odrareg

Odrareg
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 118
  • Talents: Holy 0/0/1/2/0/0
  • 2v2: 1863
  • 3v3: 576
  • LocationItaly

Posted 25 August 2012 - 12:39 PM

View PostJacob_a, on 25 August 2012 - 11:09 AM, said:

Duelists are only bad players when compared to multiglads. You speak as if any duelist is a bad player by default.

haha this is actually pretty true, not really defending duelists or something like that but it's hilarious how the community works. i don't remember when but some extremely sick warlock with multi rank 1s on 3k rating was going around saying about other locks "he's just the average baddie 2.8k warlock" , that made me smile :P

#20 Astralshots

Astralshots
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Gorefiend
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 51
  • Talents: Marksmanship

Posted 25 August 2012 - 12:55 PM

I like this thread entertaining to hear all the comments from everyone. The fact is how many PRO players do u hear calling others shit. The truth is they don't give a fuck and if ur not playing with CURRENT rank 1s then odds are ur just the average run of the mill glad like me. 9 times out of 10 when someones calling someone bad its just them out comping the loser. GG




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<