Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

Intresting changes for warrior


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 Ayrasaurus

Ayrasaurus
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 1180
  • LocationBrum town

Posted 06 April 2012 - 12:49 PM

Heroic Leap now has a 45 sec cooldown, down from 1 min.



Protection

    Devastate now deals 180% weapon damage, up from 75% weapon damage. Additional damage increased by 40%.
    Revenge now has a 6 sec cooldown, down from 9 sec. Damage increased by 200%.
    Shield Slam damage increased by 100%.
    Thunder Clap damage has been increased by 75%.


Wonder if prots going to be viable again with that avatar thing :o.
Also 45 sec heroic leap double charge and intervene out roots seems pretty sick.
Why can't we all just be friends (:

Posted Image

#2 Cyraxx

Cyraxx
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 546
  • LocationHungary

Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:18 PM

Let's hope not. I really hope they realise that Prot/Blood/Guardian/Brewmaster tank specs don't belong in Arena.

Edited by Cyraxx, 06 April 2012 - 03:16 PM.


#3 Chizzey

Chizzey
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 208

Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:19 PM

Have seen it on MMO-Champions, im really looking forward to MoP, looks really interesting!



Chizzey

#4 Nermó

Nermó
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 1281
  • LocationSweden

Posted 06 April 2012 - 02:06 PM

i realise that its still only beta, but why would they even think about increasing warriors mobility?
Posted Image

#5 Chizzey

Chizzey
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 208

Posted 06 April 2012 - 02:27 PM

I really really think, blizzzard could make WoW interesting again.

MoP looks GREAT so far, im still waiting for my invite, and only time will show if they succeed.

#6 EarlThomas

EarlThomas
  • Members
  • Posts: 25

Posted 06 April 2012 - 02:55 PM

View PostNermó, on 06 April 2012 - 02:06 PM, said:

i realise that its still only beta, but why would they even think about increasing warriors mobility?

Can't tell if serious.....

#7 Shearcookie

Shearcookie
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 95

Posted 06 April 2012 - 03:05 PM

Look's like WoW is gonna be back in MLG with these changes lads
www.twitch.tv/deedslive

Thanks for watchin! Hit the follow button!

#8 Nermó

Nermó
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 1281
  • LocationSweden

Posted 06 April 2012 - 03:10 PM

View PostEarlThomas, on 06 April 2012 - 02:55 PM, said:

Can't tell if serious.....

What? Is warrior mobility bad? Since when? please tell
Posted Image

#9 Akane

Akane
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 18

Posted 06 April 2012 - 03:37 PM

Why would someone want prot to be usable in arena, thats stupid shit honestly.

#10 Braindance

Braindance
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 1750
  • LocationAtlanta

Posted 06 April 2012 - 03:54 PM

View PostNermó, on 06 April 2012 - 03:10 PM, said:

What? Is warrior mobility bad? Since when? please tell
Dks are balanced

View PostZerstiren, on 14 August 2011 - 01:21 AM, said:

If you haven't +repped this guy, you are part of the problem.

View PostPrimex, on 23 March 2011 - 04:34 PM, said:

Veev doesnt compete for r1, he takes it whenever he wants to.

View Postsimonfra1234, on 25 August 2011 - 08:46 PM, said:

bro you got +rep'd by rapture...

#11 Pawzz

Pawzz
  • Content Editors
  • Posts: 2320
  • LocationAustria

Posted 06 April 2012 - 04:24 PM

God please no tank specs

#12 Sanira

Sanira
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 32

Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:12 PM

Heroic Leap 45sec + glyph = 30sec, + double time charge warrior mobility seems really good

#13 Chizzey

Chizzey
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 208

Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:48 PM

why would someone take double time?

sticking to juggernaut

#14 droolingmoron

droolingmoron
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 1003

Posted 06 April 2012 - 06:24 PM

View PostSanira, on 06 April 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

Heroic Leap 45sec + glyph = 30sec, + double time charge warrior mobility seems really good
yes. if you got the beta enjoy it, 'cause i doubt this will make it to live servers - even if it does it won't last.
double charge is better than juggernaut.
Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen.

L.W.

#15 Pawzz

Pawzz
  • Content Editors
  • Posts: 2320
  • LocationAustria

Posted 06 April 2012 - 07:06 PM

View Postdroolingmoron, on 06 April 2012 - 06:24 PM, said:

yes. if you got the beta enjoy it, 'cause i doubt this will make it to live servers - even if it does it won't last.
double charge is better than juggernaut.
Ye, double charge is gonna be mage rapist #1

#16 Mizzle

Mizzle
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 702

Posted 06 April 2012 - 07:50 PM

I never understood why people think that tank specs don't belong in arena...  Why should tank specs be excluded from playing arena?

#17 Genz

Genz
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 223

Posted 06 April 2012 - 09:00 PM

View PostMizzle, on 06 April 2012 - 07:50 PM, said:

I never understood why people think that tank specs don't belong in arena...  Why should tank specs be excluded from playing arena?

Because tank spec is used against mobs!

Cool changes, I still think jugger is better then double charge, but will see how it is ^^

#18 fearlol

fearlol
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 256

Posted 06 April 2012 - 09:27 PM

View PostMizzle, on 06 April 2012 - 07:50 PM, said:

I never understood why people think that tank specs don't belong in arena...  Why should tank specs be excluded from playing arena?
Posted Image

#19 sevenxd

sevenxd
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 272

Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:11 PM

View Postdroolingmoron, on 06 April 2012 - 06:24 PM, said:

double charge is better than juggernaut.

Not sure yet, you still are going to end up with a 20 second CD on Charge at some point, rather than a 12 second one.

It's all theory at the moment, but personally I think Jugga will be better right now.

#20 Quizzy

Quizzy
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 222

Posted 07 April 2012 - 01:48 AM

View Postsevenxd, on 06 April 2012 - 11:11 PM, said:

Not sure yet, you still are going to end up with a 20 second CD on Charge at some point, rather than a 12 second one.

It's all theory at the moment, but personally I think Jugga will be better right now.
I'm torn. That's all I have to say.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<