NAO Invitationals Tournament 3!
#41
Posted 26 March 2012 - 07:12 PM

enviqt is so cute
#42
Posted 26 March 2012 - 07:13 PM

#43
Posted 26 March 2012 - 07:23 PM

enviqt is so cute
#44
Posted 26 March 2012 - 09:17 PM
I might be wrong but I certainly haven't seen nor heard who actually won the last tournament.
#45
Posted 26 March 2012 - 09:19 PM
sevenxd, on 26 March 2012 - 09:17 PM, said:
I might be wrong but I certainly haven't seen nor heard who actually won the last tournament.

#46
Posted 26 March 2012 - 11:31 PM
sevenxd, on 26 March 2012 - 09:17 PM, said:
I might be wrong but I certainly haven't seen nor heard who actually won the last tournament.
http://www.arenajunk...finals-snutz-5/
#47
Posted 29 March 2012 - 04:57 PM
#48
Posted 30 March 2012 - 12:47 PM
Donald, on 25 March 2012 - 10:21 PM, said:
I have avoided the exact composition you plan to run to NOT draw out games. I'm sure games COULD be short if your opponents allow the stars to align. Maybe it's just me, but I only see long games coming from this if the opponent is prepared. I would not mind the comp if most games were short, but it would only make a mockery of the tournament and yourselves if every game just ended up in a draw.
Recently made a youtube channel showcasing matches I've had over the past couple seasons.
www.youtube.com/Talbadar
#49
Posted 30 March 2012 - 12:55 PM
Talbadar, on 30 March 2012 - 12:47 PM, said:
I have avoided the exact composition you plan to run to NOT draw out games. I'm sure games COULD be short if your opponents allow the stars to align. Maybe it's just me, but I only see long games coming from this if the opponent is prepared. I would not mind the comp if most games were short, but it would only make a mockery of the tournament and yourselves if every game just ended up in a draw.
#50
Posted 30 March 2012 - 03:10 PM
#51
Posted 30 March 2012 - 05:25 PM
#52
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:25 PM
And Im requesting that pasty unibrow nerd Chris thormans team first round
Thanks
-RamboJohny
#54
Posted 31 March 2012 - 12:22 PM

Finally, I understand why pvp in this game is so bad.
#55
Posted 31 March 2012 - 08:02 PM
1. do not allow the use of wound poison. (the only difference between rls now and last season is the wound poison buff)
2. do not allow rogues to use the glyph of garrote.
3. warlocks cant use glyph of soul swap.
this would go a long way in reducing the effectiveness of rls while keeping it in a state that is still more then viable vs other teams.
Hope this helps
#56
Posted 31 March 2012 - 08:39 PM
Kelarm, on 31 March 2012 - 12:22 PM, said:
There is a thin line between removing PvE so that we can "eradicate the plague of arenas", and in the process creating another plague called Shaman/lock/rogue (or X), which very rightfully arguably, is the worst thing of this season (even considering triple DPS).
Edited by mukuld50, 31 March 2012 - 09:04 PM.
#57
Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:11 AM
mukuld50, on 31 March 2012 - 08:39 PM, said:
i dont know how thats fair, only a few classes will actually be using the PvE gear from DS. Don't see how allowing this is making the playing field the same for every other class.
#58
Posted 01 April 2012 - 12:30 PM
brosearch, on 31 March 2012 - 08:02 PM, said:
1. do not allow the use of wound poison. (the only difference between rls now and last season is the wound poison buff)
2. do not allow rogues to use the glyph of garrote.
3. warlocks cant use glyph of soul swap.
this would go a long way in reducing the effectiveness of rls while keeping it in a state that is still more then viable vs other teams.
Hope this helps
This should apply for every rogue and warlock comp
But then people are gonna whine about mls/shadowplay again
#59
Posted 01 April 2012 - 01:13 PM
brosearch, on 31 March 2012 - 08:02 PM, said:
1. do not allow the use of wound poison. (the only difference between rls now and last season is the wound poison buff)
2. do not allow rogues to use the glyph of garrote.
3. warlocks cant use glyph of soul swap.
this would go a long way in reducing the effectiveness of rls while keeping it in a state that is still more then viable vs other teams.
Hope this helps
Yea, and dont allow hunters to use ranged weapons and let rets only use spellpower gear.
--.--
#60
Posted 01 April 2012 - 06:55 PM
ss2b24, on 01 April 2012 - 09:11 AM, said:
Dont see what you mean. We are trying to balance out the playing field for non lock/shaman. That is a better step then just letting the RLS shaman have 6k resilience with no way to kill him. Step towards improvement with the limited options we have, in my opinion.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

































Official Blizzard Quote:












