Being Aggressive with your BR
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:30 PM
I was wondering if anyone has had similar thoughts about it or is it just plain bad BR management to even think/do it.
Posted 15 March 2012 - 11:36 PM
also, remember when you MD'd like 3 UA's and 100-0'd yourself season 7(?)
your double ele team will always have a special place in my <3
Posted 16 March 2012 - 10:53 PM
Posted 19 March 2012 - 05:27 AM
Posted 20 March 2012 - 03:38 AM
Posted 25 March 2012 - 03:06 AM
When you move up to 2/5 live, people suddenly don't become beasts. They are similar to 1/3 opponents. So playing with a 5 buy-in roll instead of 8 won't kill you since you are trying to win quickly while being aware of the risk of ruin.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 02:35 PM
I know for online cash 20-40 buy ins is essential.
As for live, I feel you can get away with 10-20 if you are willing to take shots and move up.
I am a bankroll nit so I still play 1/2 live with a 3-4k br.
Posted 09 April 2012 - 01:33 AM
If I ever get stuck in the 1/3 game, even 1-1.5 buyins it gets progressively harder to get unstuck and the fact that the idiots that buy in for $40-$60 basically ship preflop or on the flop because they don't have enough for multiple streets of betting, feels like I'm not even playing poker at times.
Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:33 AM
But like I said, I'm a huge BR nit and I'm sure I probably cheated myself out of some winnings by moving up so slow. But that was the only way I could play my A game, and at least I'd never bust.
Edited by Kelarm, 22 April 2012 - 02:39 AM.
Posted 07 May 2012 - 05:45 AM
For online, I know 300k hands is an accurate sample size to determine ones winrate. As for Live, I believe 400 hours is a decent sample size. Live session logs should be consistent with hours and win/loses for winrate to be as accurate as possible.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users