Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

Should we even bother?


  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#1 herahera

herahera
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Barthilas
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 76
  • Talents: Unholy
  • RBG: 384

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:08 PM

So was reviewing some of my games when i vs'd rzn via his stream since he recorded them. And i realized that he took hardly any damage even when fully dotted. a recuperate+shield or renew would negate any damage that i did. So i was wondering what do other warlocks think?

Should we even bother dotting rogues since we can pretty much almost never swap on them? or should we make better use of our time and do other stuff lol.

#2 Taunkaztorm

Taunkaztorm
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 1022
  • Talents: Demonology

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:14 PM

Keep UA on them so you can fear them at least.

View Postwisdomcube, on 15 September 2011 - 05:58 PM, said:

Priest are better healers than shaman but why would a lock play with a a class that shares the same cc dr? People are just too fucking stupid to realize this.





"NIckelback is good u know.."

#3 herahera

herahera
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Barthilas
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 76
  • Talents: Unholy
  • RBG: 384

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:17 PM

im not talking about covering fears. im talking about dotting them up. ffs.

#4 Jokerplex

Jokerplex
  • Junkies
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 1007
  • Talents: Marksmanship 2/0/0/2/1/1

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:31 PM

ye warlocks need more single target damage

+rep if im true

#5 Navoz

Navoz
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 238
  • Talents: Holy 2/0/1/1/2/.

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:35 PM

wat....

#6 Xelithras

Xelithras
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Vashj
  • Rampage / Saccage
  • Posts: 300
  • Talents: Frost
  • RBG: 192

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:44 PM

he didnt say locks are bad? just that rogues are retarded , and i think everyone can agree on that

#7 herahera

herahera
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Barthilas
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 76
  • Talents: Unholy
  • RBG: 384

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:46 PM

View PostXelithras, on 10 December 2011 - 12:44 PM, said:

he didnt say locks are bad? just that rogues are retarded , and i think everyone can agree on that
the only person with some sense so far

#8 Gorelik

Gorelik
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 76
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:47 PM

View PostXelithras, on 10 December 2011 - 12:44 PM, said:

he didnt say locks are bad? just that rogues are retarded , and i think everyone can agree on that

Thats true, but rogues were always a retarded class. irrelevant of the 25% wound, even before that they were really stupid. the 25% wound just buffed it a bit

#9 Jeffylol

Jeffylol
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 275
  • Talents: Subtlety 1/2/2/0/0/1
  • 2v2: 1719
  • 3v3: 1605

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:47 PM

ROGUES AREN'T OP OMG JUST L2P WE DONT EVEN HAVE ANY MOBILITY VS CASTERS :S
Legendariska dolkar.

#10 Gorelik

Gorelik
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 76
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:48 PM

View PostPoisonxoxo, on 10 December 2011 - 12:47 PM, said:

ROGUES AREN'T OP OMG JUST L2P WE DONT EVEN HAVE ANY MOBILITY VS CASTERS :S
omg ikr

#11 Skilletina

Skilletina
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Sylvanas
  • Rampage / Saccage
  • Posts: 82
  • Talents: Unholy

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:50 PM

View PostPoisonxoxo, on 10 December 2011 - 12:47 PM, said:

ROGUES AREN'T OP OMG JUST L2P WE DONT EVEN HAVE ANY MOBILITY VS CASTERS :S


giggle

#12 cochonhalal

cochonhalal
  • Turnedlife
  • Premium Junkies
  • Curse Premium
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Aegwynn
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 1030
  • Talents: Assassination 1/0/0/0/2/.

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:55 PM

View PostJokerplex, on 10 December 2011 - 12:31 PM, said:

ye warlocks need more single target damage

+rep if im true

OMFG ITS DJDICE

#13 herahera

herahera
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Barthilas
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 76
  • Talents: Unholy
  • RBG: 384

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:56 PM

View PostPoisonxoxo, on 10 December 2011 - 12:47 PM, said:

ROGUES AREN'T OP OMG JUST L2P WE DONT EVEN HAVE ANY MOBILITY VS CASTERS :S

FOR SURE ROGUES MOST IMMOBILE CLASS

#14 misios

misios
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 1419
  • Talents: Destruction
  • LocationNorway

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:57 PM

no one answering his question.
tbh if you have other targets to dot which is better, and you wont swap to rogue, I'd down prio dottin rogue then. however, like when you can dot him cuz theres no other targets around feel free to do, because he might drop to 80% and you can swap to him then.

by dotting rogue up you also increase your shadowbolt/eradiction procs.
dot rogue if you have time, you need to take into account that warlock dotting is based around felhunter right now, 3 of our dots doesn't do alot of dmg on it's own, but once they get modlified by haunt/felhunter thats where we start doing alot of dmg.

also remember that the enemy healer will have to use some globals on the rogue, seing as his rogue will drop only with recup.

the rogue can also use his cd's more offensively if he knows you guys wont swap to him, this applies mentally to the rogue as well - seing as he never is dotted or focused he feels that he is free to do whatever he wants.

Edited by misios, 10 December 2011 - 12:58 PM.

Posted Image

#15 Jbaaller

Jbaaller
  • Jballer
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Kor'gall
  • Cruelty / Crueldad
  • Posts: 120
  • Talents: Retribution 1/0/2/2/2/0
  • RBG: 384

Posted 10 December 2011 - 12:58 PM

View PostXelithras, on 10 December 2011 - 12:44 PM, said:

he didnt say locks are bad? just that rogues are retarded , and i think everyone can agree on that

Well, i wouldn't say rogues are retarded, i think it's more the priest being the most op healing class in the game, half a global used and it's countered everyone in the game on a 15sec cd? aoe cc on a 23sec cd? xD lol what a joke of a class rly no wonder rmp, fmp are always fucking ridiculous, remove priest from the game and buff warlocks and dk
"Jballer: even while holy paladins are at the weakest state (i don't give a fuck, i just get glad)"

#16 Kaphron

Kaphron
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Lightbringer
  • Cruelty / Crueldad
  • Posts: 185
  • Talents:
  • RBG: 192
  • LocationEgypt

Posted 10 December 2011 - 01:28 PM

pro locks only dot 1 target m8

#17 Jokerplex

Jokerplex
  • Junkies
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 1007
  • Talents: Marksmanship 2/0/0/2/1/1

Posted 10 December 2011 - 01:39 PM

View PostPangpang, on 10 December 2011 - 12:55 PM, said:

OMFG ITS DJDICE
Wanna fight?

#18 herahera

herahera
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Barthilas
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 76
  • Talents: Unholy
  • RBG: 384

Posted 10 December 2011 - 01:40 PM

i was being rhetorical actually lol

#19 Shadowtwist

Shadowtwist
  • LocationRiyadh, Saudi Arabia

Posted 10 December 2011 - 02:10 PM

View Postherahera, on 10 December 2011 - 01:40 PM, said:

i was being rhetorical actually lol

You asked other warlocks on their opinon how is is that rhetorical?

I think it depends on the comp you play some comps like rls can drop a rogue in a kidney smoke

Edited by Shadowtwist, 10 December 2011 - 02:13 PM.

Posted Image

#20 Kaphron

Kaphron
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Lightbringer
  • Cruelty / Crueldad
  • Posts: 185
  • Talents:
  • RBG: 192
  • LocationEgypt

Posted 10 December 2011 - 02:15 PM

yh rls vs rmp u like dot the rogue till he gets sick of dot fears and cloaks then u go like lol bomb kidney he died haha claim rating ftw




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<