Jump to content

Photo
- - - - -

RBG Glad Cutoff


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#41 Ensipid

Ensipid
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 954
  • Talents: Affliction
  • RBG: 2561

Posted 21 April 2011 - 08:04 AM

Probably going to be pretty low tbh. You have to play a fucking LOT of games to get anywhere even remotely high, and all those games are long as fuck and slow Qs to boot. Personally I started doing rbgs very often (like maybe 30 games a week or so, which is a ton of time considering Qs and game length)about a month ago and I'm still not even 2500, having never lost a single point of rating on the way up and starting from like 800 rating or so too. The grind is fucking ridiculous and I seriously doubt a large number of people are going to end up in the upper 2000s, and I even more seriously doubt that anyone is going to be able to actually grind this shit in like a couple weeks' time if the mount turns out to look cool.



Heh, try the OLD GRIND. Then complain to me : D
  • 0

#42 Kelarm

Kelarm
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 3,634
  • Talents: ./././././.
  • RBG: 2922

Posted 21 April 2011 - 10:05 AM

Heh, try the OLD GRIND. Then complain to me : D


Lol, haven't been playing long enough for that, thank god. But there is no argument that the RBG grind seems extremely out of place in the WoW of today.

Edited by Kelarm, 21 April 2011 - 10:05 AM.

  • 0

Official Blizzard Quote:

Part of the reason is that Battlegrounds are like ducks.

Finally, I understand why pvp in this game is so bad.

#43 Ensipid

Ensipid
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 954
  • Talents: Affliction
  • RBG: 2561

Posted 22 April 2011 - 06:19 AM

Lol, haven't been playing long enough for that, thank god. But there is no argument that the RBG grind seems extremely out of place in the WoW of today.


I can agree to that.
  • 0

#44 Cleanse

Cleanse
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 28
  • Talents: Protection

Posted 24 April 2011 - 03:15 AM

http://www.conquestw...realm=&faction=
  • 0
Cleanse <Insomnia>

#45 Filovirus

Filovirus
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 3,344
  • Talents: ./././././.
  • RBG: 2795

Posted 24 April 2011 - 06:15 AM

In queue, w/e group comp lots of points q up
  • 0

#46 Filovirus

Filovirus
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 3,344
  • Talents: ./././././.
  • RBG: 2795

Posted 24 April 2011 - 06:48 AM

done for tonight ggs
  • 0

#47 Popular

Popular
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Blackrock
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 247
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 24 April 2011 - 06:49 AM

You're posting in the wrong thread, lady.
  • 0

#48 Filovirus

Filovirus
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 3,344
  • Talents: ./././././.
  • RBG: 2795

Posted 24 April 2011 - 08:41 AM

an excellent point popski
  • 0

#49 Bommes

Bommes
  • Junkies
  • Trollclass_name
  • EU-Gorgonnash
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 41
  • Talents: Enhancement
  • RBG: 1532

Posted 24 April 2011 - 09:50 AM

http://www.conquestwow.com/?region=us&bg=bloodlust-us&realm=&faction=


Are the numbers accurate? How do you get them??
  • 0

#50 Thargun

Thargun
  • Members
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Frostwolf
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 102
  • Talents: Unholy

Posted 24 April 2011 - 03:12 PM

don´t think so. should be a lot more. the site can only take those into account who are signed in there. to the top the list is quite accurate but downwards...bet a lot people are missing.
  • 0

#51 Futon

Futon
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Nathrezim
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 682
  • Talents: Beast Mastery

Posted 25 April 2011 - 10:26 AM

http://www.conquestwow.com/?region=us&bg=bloodlust-us&realm=&faction=


That seems really low to me, 440 people in my bg have done rateds this season? That can't be accurate. My 3-1 alt is missing. The lowest rated person on my server according to that is 1700. Way offff, good attempt though i guess.
  • 0

#52 Cleanse

Cleanse
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 28
  • Talents: Protection

Posted 27 April 2011 - 08:05 AM

Word on the street is that people need to play 10 games to count, so that's what is filtered.
  • 0
Cleanse <Insomnia>

#53 Futon

Futon
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Nathrezim
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 682
  • Talents: Beast Mastery

Posted 28 April 2011 - 01:09 AM

Word on the street is that people need to play 10 games to count, so that's what is filtered.


Even if that was the case its still missing a TONNNN of people. You can now inspect other peoples RBG rating and then look at the website and see that they aren't on it at all :P
  • 0

#54 Cleanse

Cleanse
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 28
  • Talents: Protection

Posted 28 April 2011 - 01:58 PM

Add them in ;] I have the top 2k from both regions parsed often and also people's own personal inputs. With more community interaction, the list will become more accurate.
  • 0
Cleanse <Insomnia>

#55 Futon

Futon
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Nathrezim
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 682
  • Talents: Beast Mastery

Posted 30 April 2011 - 09:49 AM

The top 2000 is listed on wows own battle.net Is there anyway to datamine everyone on armory's rated bg rating to update automatically rather then physically go through and list everyone thats not in the top 2000. Thats a ton of work for anyone.

I find it really strange that blizzard chose to post the 2000 in all of the US rather then the top 2000 per battlegroup, really weird way to do that. And makes for a lot of confusion.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<