Jump to content

Photo
- - - - -

RBG Glad Cutoff


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#21 Shrouds

Shrouds
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 1,728

Posted 18 March 2011 - 01:35 AM

As dumb as this sounds, I think a lot of it depends on how badass the mount is. If it's a really sick mount I think a lot of people will grind ratings for the last month or two of the season after the mount is seen on 4.2 on the ptr. There're a LOT of people who could easily get to 3k+ if they had enough incentive to chain que. If the mounts retarded I don't think many people will care to, since the title itself won't mean a whole lot.

The horde one is going to be awesome and the ally one is going to be like a three-legged war camel or something.
  • 1

#22 Alkazard

Alkazard
  • Junkies
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Frostwolf
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 1,070
  • Talents: Protection
  • RBG: 2229

Posted 18 March 2011 - 02:38 AM

So wait, I haven't paid attention to RBGs -
What is the actual stipulations to these?
What is this top 100 people are throwing around?
  • 0

wear bigger wizard hats *<|¦-)


#23 Ikkiau

Ikkiau
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 295
  • Talents: Windwalker 1/0/1/2/0/1
  • RBG: 2241

Posted 18 March 2011 - 03:22 AM

45 tell safety!
  • 0
Posted Image

#24 tyrant750

tyrant750
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 21
  • Talents: Arms 1/1/1/1/0/0
  • RBG: 960

Posted 22 March 2011 - 04:32 PM

I think the cutoff will be closer to top 2000 and guessing it will be cutoff at around 2.5-2.6k

2900 is far too high, 2700 will be safe.
  • 0
Posted Image

#25 Guest_DroozywOw~_*

Guest_DroozywOw~_*

Posted 22 March 2011 - 04:50 PM

gonna be a tough one
  • 0

#26 Shakedown

Shakedown
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Burning Legion
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 102
  • Talents: ./././././.

Posted 22 March 2011 - 06:24 PM

Takes so god damn long to get rating up,even without losing points, idk how you guys do it
  • 0

#27 dorout1

dorout1
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Frostmane
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 159
  • Talents: Subtlety

Posted 22 March 2011 - 11:13 PM

RGB doesn't get the glad title... fyi.
  • 0

#28

  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Stormreaver
  • Rampage
  • Talents: Windwalker 0/0/0/1/2/.

Posted 23 March 2011 - 01:41 AM

RGB doesn't get the glad title... fyi.


I hate the internet
  • 0
Lawson~Flag Carrier
Posted Image

#29 lucrativex

lucrativex
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 679

Posted 23 March 2011 - 01:43 AM

2900+? Rofl. More like 2500...IF that
  • 1
Posted Image

#30 skylar1

skylar1
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 389
  • LocationZagreb, Croatia

Posted 24 March 2011 - 11:18 PM

http://img153.images...62/65078636.png
  • 0
WARBOUND BROSTORMS

#31 Maldazzar

Maldazzar
  • Junkies
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Blackrock
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 691
  • Talents: Arms

Posted 25 March 2011 - 02:11 AM

it's a game master so he must know what he's talking about
  • 0

#32 skylar1

skylar1
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 389
  • LocationZagreb, Croatia

Posted 25 March 2011 - 09:01 AM

agree...
  • 0
WARBOUND BROSTORMS

#33 jetskii527

jetskii527
  • Kfmee
  • Junkies
  • Dwarfclass_name
  • US-Laughing Skull
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 240
  • Talents: Elemental
  • RBG: 960

Posted 25 March 2011 - 04:26 PM

yeah 2900+ is safe because it's the top 100 right now. More importantly it's going to get harder to get equal quality people with low mmr's so more people are going to lose points on their way to 3k.



do you have any idea how many people have done rated bgs, pretty sure 1000 plus players are going to get it...

Edited by jetskii527, 25 March 2011 - 04:28 PM.

  • 0
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

#34 Mylez

Mylez
  • Junkies
  • Gnomeclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 2,057
  • Talents:

Posted 25 March 2011 - 05:45 PM

agree...

joke?
  • 0

#35 Novinetz

Novinetz
  • Stoleyourgf
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Laughing Skull
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 350
  • Talents:

Posted 25 March 2011 - 07:09 PM

rated bgs are a joke


fixed
  • 0

#36 Sargazz

Sargazz
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Executus
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 51
  • Talents: Subtlety
  • RBG: 2285

Posted 26 March 2011 - 03:39 AM

hey guys im 3100 am i in range for my wookie scorpion?
  • 0

#37 Ensipid

Ensipid
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 954
  • Talents: Affliction
  • RBG: 2561

Posted 20 April 2011 - 04:18 AM

You're never safe, keep q'ing
  • 0

#38 SeedSargeras

SeedSargeras
  • Premium Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 301
  • Talents: Frost 2/2/2/1/1/2/.
  • LocationNewfie

Posted 20 April 2011 - 10:02 PM

In all honesty, if it comes down to any players playing 1 game and having any rating being eligable for the pool numbers, it will cause anybody above 2500-2600 to get the title.

The only reason I keep doing them still is cause they're fun (I was always a premade bg'er in wotlk) and some kind of hope there's a #1 title for horde on my battlegroup.
  • 0

#39 Kelarm

Kelarm
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 3,634
  • Talents: ./././././.
  • RBG: 2922

Posted 21 April 2011 - 05:21 AM

Probably going to be pretty low tbh. You have to play a fucking LOT of games to get anywhere even remotely high, and all those games are long as fuck and slow Qs to boot. Personally I started doing rbgs very often (like maybe 30 games a week or so, which is a ton of time considering Qs and game length)about a month ago and I'm still not even 2500, having never lost a single point of rating on the way up and starting from like 800 rating or so too. The grind is fucking ridiculous and I seriously doubt a large number of people are going to end up in the upper 2000s, and I even more seriously doubt that anyone is going to be able to actually grind this shit in like a couple weeks' time if the mount turns out to look cool.
  • 0

Official Blizzard Quote:

Part of the reason is that Battlegrounds are like ducks.

Finally, I understand why pvp in this game is so bad.

#40 Witness

Witness
  • Junkies
  • Trollclass_name
  • EU-Gorgonnash
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 973
  • Talents: Arcane

Posted 21 April 2011 - 07:51 AM

Probably going to be pretty low tbh. You have to play a fucking LOT of games to get anywhere even remotely high, and all those games are long as fuck and slow Qs to boot. Personally I started doing rbgs very often (like maybe 30 games a week or so, which is a ton of time considering Qs and game length)about a month ago and I'm still not even 2500, having never lost a single point of rating on the way up and starting from like 800 rating or so too. The grind is fucking ridiculous and I seriously doubt a large number of people are going to end up in the upper 2000s, and I even more seriously doubt that anyone is going to be able to actually grind this shit in like a couple weeks' time if the mount turns out to look cool.

Yeah, but as this is the first time this system is used I'd rather not miss it by a few points (and rbgs are also really fun if you queue with a good group).
  • 0

when a person doesn't enter arena until the gates open ( like it ends up in 2v3 ), the arena match isn't counted and is automatically a draw when the gates open ( without the annoying -16 for both teams ), thus no one gains or loses pts/MMR.

I would've loved this back in s5/s6 when my microwave would interfere with my router if someone started using it so I had a rule that nobody was allowed to use the microwave while I did arena.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<