Spell Cleave still VERY Strong
Posted 03 February 2010 - 09:22 PM
anyone else have experience with their spellcleaves having increased success?
only thing i've noticed is that RMP does seem a bit harder due to the absorbs being relatively better than heals from the priest.
Posted 03 February 2010 - 09:26 PM
I'm assuming you're implying other spellcleaves are not strong? Otherwise I don't understand your response at all.
Posted 03 February 2010 - 09:27 PM
im implying he wrote "ua/aff/druid" and as far as i remember he played ele aff dru
edit: didnt want to be retarded or anything, just thought some people could think double lock works now
Posted 03 February 2010 - 09:29 PM
Oh, I didn't catch that :o
Posted 03 February 2010 - 09:50 PM
Posted 03 February 2010 - 09:58 PM
Posted 03 February 2010 - 10:35 PM
Posted 03 February 2010 - 10:43 PM
Posted 03 February 2010 - 11:30 PM
Posted 03 February 2010 - 11:42 PM
Posted 04 February 2010 - 12:39 AM
shape up, england, it's time to get out of the middle ages
^on the Royal Family and how they are bleeding the taxpayers dry!
Posted 04 February 2010 - 12:40 AM
On a more serious note, i'm pretty sure a shadowpriest would be better with mage/druid than a ua lock. A third spammable cc seems like overkill in that department.. the off/def dispels could probably contribute a lot more, and the spriest burst is probably better than multidotting with emergency sheeps just removing them.
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:02 AM
My team tried affliction for like 30 games, we destroyed some comps but the more cookie cutter ones just laughed at us.
Destro now and it is MUCH easier. Shadowfury peeling power is unmatchable and I think you're just gimping yourself without it as MLS. The comp is still very strong as the post states :P
This is around 2450-2500 MMR.
Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:19 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users