Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help

spell pene on new items


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#1 zajklon

zajklon
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Bronzebeard
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 548
  • Talents: Destruction 1/0/1/2/2/1

Posted 02 February 2010 - 06:26 PM

can anyone on us realms say how much spell pene each new item gives?

#2 chaimer

chaimer
  • Junkies
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 573
  • Talents: Destruction

Posted 02 February 2010 - 07:01 PM

pretty sure the offhand was 73 or 76.  cant quite remember though.  definitely mid 70s.  il check in a few minutes.

#3 Arlok

Arlok
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Zirkel des Cenarius
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 292
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 02 February 2010 - 09:30 PM

It's 43 spellpen on the wand and 79 on the offhand.

I'll probably go with 43 (wand) + 35 (cloak enchant) + 43 (jc gem)+ 12 sp/10 gem = 131 spellpen.

#4 Kanlis

Kanlis
  • Members
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Wildhammer
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 170
  • Talents: Shadow

Posted 02 February 2010 - 09:44 PM

people going with haste or spell pen enchant on cloak?
Posted Image

#5 Zlak

Zlak
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 67
  • Talents:

Posted 02 February 2010 - 09:46 PM

always spell pene on cloak. The haste enchant is underbudgeted compared to that.

#6 zajklon

zajklon
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Bronzebeard
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 548
  • Talents: Destruction 1/0/1/2/2/1

Posted 02 February 2010 - 09:48 PM

can also go with haste on cloak and spell pene oh + 4x purple gem wich is exactly 130 spell pene. (put 4th socket in shoulders because bonus is crap)

or just ignore bonuses and go oh + pene cloak and 2x purple wich is 139.

those are best 2 i found

#7 Zlak

Zlak
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 67
  • Talents:

Posted 02 February 2010 - 09:49 PM

You're better off getting the haste elsewhere :x

#8 zajklon

zajklon
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Bronzebeard
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 548
  • Talents: Destruction 1/0/1/2/2/1

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:18 PM

i know, but the thing is you need overcap on pene else to so the haste enchant isn't that much underbudgeted . would be 23 haste vs 26 pene.. unless you are gonna use some other combination but then you lose alot of socket bonusses or spellpower

#9 Scarra

Scarra
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Arthas
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 1579
  • Talents:

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:19 PM

gimme a day or two to do a random writeup on this stuff again

#10 morsei

morsei
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 440

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:21 PM

pene = penis in spanish

#11 zajklon

zajklon
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Bronzebeard
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 548
  • Talents: Destruction 1/0/1/2/2/1

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:21 PM

i gave up after 15 minutes :p

#12 eforsmo

eforsmo
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Talnivarr
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 382
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:23 PM

peñe*

#13 Zlak

Zlak
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 67
  • Talents:

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:24 PM

zajklon said:

i know, but the thing is you need overcap on pene else to so the haste enchant isn't that much underbudgeted . would be 23 haste vs 26 pene.. unless you are gonna use some other combination but then you lose alot of socket bonusses or spellpower

Once I get the wrathful spell penetration wand I'll be sitting at 130 spell penetration without any JC gems and with all my socket bonuses, those I could be bothered with anyway.

#14 Lawdyx

Lawdyx
  • Lawdy
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 1017
  • Talents:

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:27 PM

was wondering why no one gemmed raw spellpen gems in blue slots
u can get 'capped' with 100 spellpen from 4 slots + cloak enchant
then u'll get haste offhand and wand and spellpen offhand and wand and swap it out for mages
that way you have 135 spellpen with haste stuff on and 237 (with relentless ones) and probably 250+ with wrathful pieces negating all of mages resistances

#15 Domesauce

Domesauce
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 873
  • Talents: Affliction 0/0/1/0/2/1
  • RBG: 2098

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:32 PM

Arlok said:

It's 43 spellpen on the wand and 79 on the offhand.

I'll probably go with 43 (wand) + 35 (cloak enchant) + 43 (jc gem)+ 12 sp/10 gem = 131 spellpen.

also planning to use wand + gems for 130, be able to swap haste wand in for mark/no resist, pen offhand for mage+sprot

#16 Arlok

Arlok
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Zirkel des Cenarius
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 292
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 02 February 2010 - 10:47 PM

Domesauce said:

also planning to use wand + gems for 130, be able to swap haste wand in for mark/no resist, pen offhand for mage+sprot

Exactly.

#17 Scarra

Scarra
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Arthas
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 1579
  • Talents:

Posted 03 February 2010 - 01:09 AM

Lawdyx said:

was wondering why no one gemmed raw spellpen gems in blue slots
u can get 'capped' with 100 spellpen from 4 slots + cloak enchant
then u'll get haste offhand and wand and spellpen offhand and wand and swap it out for mages
that way you have 135 spellpen with haste stuff on and 237 (with relentless ones) and probably 250+ with wrathful pieces negating all of mages resistances

cause then you are over the cap by 5 and that's 5 wasted itemization points that could have been saved with better knowledge of available gems/enchants/gear

#18 Lawdyx

Lawdyx
  • Lawdy
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 1017
  • Talents:

Posted 03 February 2010 - 11:12 AM

Scarra said:

cause then you are over the cap by 5 and that's 5 wasted itemization points that could have been saved with better knowledge of available gems/enchants/gear

i rather end up 5 over the cap than 1-5 below the cap with oh/wand

#19 Zlak

Zlak
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 67
  • Talents:

Posted 03 February 2010 - 11:32 AM

Lawdyx said:

i rather end up 5 over the cap than 1-5 below the cap with oh/wand


4x sp/spell pene, wrathful spell pene wand and spell pene on cloak = 130

EDIT: I don't know what else to put in my blue sockets. SP/Stam seems like a waste.

#20 zajklon

zajklon
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Bronzebeard
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 548
  • Talents: Destruction 1/0/1/2/2/1

Posted 03 February 2010 - 11:40 AM

you could ignore some socket bonusses and gem sp instead in blue slots:p
red gem in weapon is 23 sp instead of 18 if you'd gemmed a blue there instead.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<