Jump to content

Relentless Gladiator Class Breakdown (USA/EU)


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#1 chaimer

chaimer
  • Junkies
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 573
  • Talents: Destruction

Posted 20 January 2010 - 09:49 AM

USA

3v3
:paladin: 11 - 17%
:mage: 8 - 12.5%
:warrior: 8 - 12.5%
:priest: 7 - 11%
:rogue: 7 - 11%
:hunter: 6 - 9%
:warlock: 6 - 9%
:shaman: 5 - 8%
:druid: 5 - 8%
:deathknight: 1 - 1.5%
Total: 64 RGlads

5v5
:shaman: 16 - 19%
:priest: 14 - 17%
:paladin: 12 - 14.5%
:warlock: 11 - 13%
:mage: 10 - 12%
:warrior: 6 - 7%
:hunter: 5 - 6%
:druid: 5 - 6%
:rogue: 4 - 5%
:deathknight: 0 - 0%
Total: 83 RGlads
Grand Total 3v3/5v5: 147


-------------------------
EU

3v3
:paladin: 14 - 14%
:mage: 13 - 13%
:priest: 12 - 12%
:rogue: 12 - 12%
:warrior: 12 - 12%
:warlock: 12 - 12%
:shaman: 7 - 7%
:druid: 7 - 7%
:hunter: 6 - 6%
:deathknight: 6 - 6%
Total: 101 RGlads

5v5
:shaman: 25 - 20.5%
:paladin: 24 - 20%
:priest: 19 - 15.5%
:warlock: 17 - 14%
:hunter: 13 - 10.5%
:warrior: 10 - 8%
:mage: 9 - 7%
:rogue: 2 - 1.5%
:deathknight: 2 - 1.5%
:druid: 1 - 1%
Total: 122 RGlads
Grand Total 3v3/5v5: 223

-------------------
USA has 13 battlegroups.
EU has 16 battlegroups.

Thus:
USA averaged 11.3 RGlads per BG
EU averaged 14.0 RGlads per BG



***This DOES count players twice if they achieved RGlad in both 3v3 and 5v5.  This was a very rare occurence it seemed, but just know that those players are counted twice in this data***

This is including all the many many tied teams, and of course is subject to change if infractions occured.  Also, these are only team members with the required PR for the title.

Things i noticed while doing this:
-holy fucking christ europe has a buttload of ties.  one 3v3 bracket had a 6-way tie.
-the diversity of comps in the USA is actually >>>>>>> than those in Europe.  most of the european titles went to cookie cutter comps (especially rmp in 3v3, and 2346[war/hunt]/2345)
-most popular comp in 3v3 for both USA and EU was :priest::rogue::mage:
-most popular comp in 5v5 for EU was :hunter::warlock::shaman::priest::paladin:
-USA did not seem to have a dominant 5v5 comp.


p.s. +rep! :) teehee

#2 salice

salice
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Rivendare
  • Emberstorm
  • Posts: 1234
  • Talents: Shadow

Posted 20 January 2010 - 09:50 AM

Interesting stuff

#3 Akaforty

Akaforty
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Drak'thul
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 343
  • Talents:

Posted 20 January 2010 - 09:54 AM

Nice post, thanks, redirected to here from http://www.arenajunk...ad.php?t=146636 (Waiting for the EU ones :o)
Posted Image
I will +rep you back if you include your name.(Make sure I can find your post easily.)
If you're interested in Cataclysm and specifically warlock class, visit my Youtube Channel for nice inside beta videos.
http://www.youtube.com/VisitorCz

#4 Aggronaut

Aggronaut
  • Premium
  • Curse Premium
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Illidan
  • Rampage
  • Posts: 488
  • Talents: Assassination
  • RBG: 192
  • LocationPA

Posted 20 January 2010 - 09:54 AM

I want to see what comp those 8 warriors were running. Unless they did it as prot. If that's the case fuck them.

#5 chaimer

chaimer
  • Junkies
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 573
  • Talents: Destruction

Posted 20 January 2010 - 09:56 AM

Aggronaut said:

I want to see what comp those 8 warriors were running. Unless they did it as prot. If that's the case fuck them.

just remembering off the top of my head, pretty sure it was about half and half for 3v3.  only 1 prot warrior got it in 5s (so about 4 prot 4 arms in 3v3)

#6 bighandxyz

bighandxyz
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Fenris
  • Whirlwind
  • Posts: 1167
  • Talents: Blood 0/2/0/0/1/0
  • RBG: 2041

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:08 AM

oh hey look, 1.5% and 0%. what a surprise!

#7 Saracens

Saracens
  • Junkies
  • Trollclass_name
  • US-Illidan
  • Rampage
  • Posts: 1681
  • Talents: Enhancement 1/2/2/2/1/0
  • 2v2: 1822
  • 3v3: 768
  • 5v5: 2079

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:09 AM

like 1/3 the RGlads on US compared to EU rofl.
Posted Image
Formerly Adori of Cho'gall.

#8 Touché1296682727

Touché1296682727
  • Members
  • Orcclass_name
  • US-Blackrock
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 1361
  • Talents: Unholy

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:09 AM

chaimer said:

:deathknight: 1 - 1.5%

l2p dks

#9 Emopandah

Emopandah
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 1525
  • Talents: Shadow 0/1/2/1/2/2
  • RBG: 2275
  • LocationNew Zealand

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:22 AM

Whats great is dk's are going to come in here blaming there class but when hunters had that rep it was a L2P issue:rolleyes:

#10 Arterian

Arterian
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Blackrock
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 6247
  • Talents: Shadow

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:27 AM

Basically this list further emphasizes that Paladins are the best healer/class overall and DKs are currently the worst class (although obviously not as bad as the statistics would hint, imo.)

View PostZilea, on 08 October 2011 - 02:36 PM, said:

Believe it or not I'm a nice guy with a mild mannered personality. So no, i wouldn't "choke someone", even though my 6pack abs allow me to do that

#11 Moonies

Moonies
  • Moderators
  • Curse Premium
  • Trollclass_name
  • EU-Dragonmaw
  • Cataclysme / Cataclysm
  • Posts: 6573
  • Talents: Elemental

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:37 AM

223 Relentless EU gladiators, that's a bit absurd

#12 chaimer

chaimer
  • Junkies
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 573
  • Talents: Destruction

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:39 AM

The data from Europe is so fucking skewed.  There were plenty of TSGs in EU who got the title, but its hard to tell if they were really rank1 viable , or if they just managed a tie.

#13 Stosh52

Stosh52
  • Members
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Illidan
  • Rampage
  • Posts: 246
  • Talents: Destruction

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:40 AM

Wow DK rep is funny.

IMO Dk's aren't a "bad" class. They just lack alot of synergy with other classes. Which is weird because they have alot of CD's and utilty.

Their missing some spark that makes people want to play with DK's.

I don't think an MS is the answer but they need something that will alow them to build some synergy with other classes.

Just a thought.
Stoshx -Illidan

#14 Kelarm

Kelarm
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 3567
  • Talents: ./././././.
  • RBG: 2922

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:40 AM

Arterian said:

Basically this list further emphasizes that Paladins are the best healer/class overall and DKs are currently the worst class (although obviously not as bad as the statistics would hint, imo.)

The sample size is still really small.  DKs did a lot better in EU than US, too.  The 5s component also doesn't mean much since melee is pretty crappy in 5s.

Gladiator class breakdown would be a bit more indicative of class strength.  DKs would probably be much closer to the other classes, though still near or on the bottom probably.

Official Blizzard Quote:

Part of the reason is that Battlegrounds are like ducks.
Finally, I understand why pvp in this game is so bad.

#15 Whiteshadow

Whiteshadow

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:43 AM

It's no surprise for a defensive healer to thrive in a burst heavy season, especially with tools like aura mastery to keep the good times rolling.

#16 Nifti

Nifti
  • Junkies
  • Worgenclass_name
  • EU-Mug'thol
  • Vengeance / Rache
  • Posts: 810
  • Talents: Blood

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:46 AM

Id like to see gladiator breakdown by class. The #1 data is pretty inacurate with all the sharing (lol 6way tie vengeance 3v3).

#17 Arterian

Arterian
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Blackrock
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 6247
  • Talents: Shadow

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:47 AM

Kelarm said:

The sample size is still really small.  DKs did a lot better in EU than US, too.  The 5s component also doesn't mean much since melee is pretty crappy in 5s.

Gladiator class breakdown would be a bit more indicative of class strength.  DKs would probably be much closer to the other classes, though still near or on the bottom probably.

I predict the top and bottom results will be the exact same for Gladiator Class Breakdown.

View PostZilea, on 08 October 2011 - 02:36 PM, said:

Believe it or not I'm a nice guy with a mild mannered personality. So no, i wouldn't "choke someone", even though my 6pack abs allow me to do that

#18 chaimer

chaimer
  • Junkies
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Sargeras
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 573
  • Talents: Destruction

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:48 AM

Nifti said:

Id like to see gladiator breakdown by class. The #1 data is pretty inacurate with all the sharing (lol 6way tie vengeance 3v3).

Wish i had the time to do that.  I'm sure someone with a coding background can figure out a scrypt to do that automatically.  I did this shit by hand.

#19 Deleted

Deleted
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Kor'gall
  • Cruelty / Crueldad
  • Posts: 268
  • Talents: Shadow

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:52 AM

Shamans UP class clearly :rolleyes:

#20 Akaforty

Akaforty
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Drak'thul
  • Reckoning / Abrechnung
  • Posts: 343
  • Talents:

Posted 20 January 2010 - 10:58 AM

Mine shows 211 EU RGlads and 150 US RGlads(Scanned all teams individually for eligible players).
Could be wrong due to Multiple R1 Chars.
Posted Image
I will +rep you back if you include your name.(Make sure I can find your post easily.)
If you're interested in Cataclysm and specifically warlock class, visit my Youtube Channel for nice inside beta videos.
http://www.youtube.com/VisitorCz




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<