Jump to content

Photo

The latency reducing program


  • Please log in to reply
289 replies to this topic

#81 qazzi

qazzi
  • Creolophus
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Rivendare
  • Emberstorm
  • Posts: 55
  • Talents: Arms

Posted 07 November 2008 - 01:49 AM

Wow.. this addon doesn't work as it is intended... my enemies are not lagging at all when I fight them...??
  • 0
The #1 Warrior in the World has Spoken ~> 2800 2v2 105-0
  • "We must ALL BOW DOWN to the MIGHTY CREOLOPHUS or be tossed into the flames of hell by the mighty lord of the warriors 'Creolophus,' all hail!"

#82 Wisser

Wisser
  • Members
  • Taurenclass_name
  • EU-Twilight's Hammer
  • Blackout
  • Posts: 15
  • Talents: Balance

Posted 13 November 2008 - 09:01 AM

Can this be done for free? or ;(:(
  • 0

#83 Koschy

Koschy
  • Members
  • Gnomeclass_name
  • US-Medivh
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 81
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 05 December 2008 - 09:12 AM

Just tried this today in Vista 64 bit. I can confirm a huge improvement in my latency. I used to average 220 to 250. I now see 29-50. Thank you very much! I'm passing this on to my friends.
  • 0

#84 Aquillo

Aquillo
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Arthas
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 66
  • Talents: Assassination

Posted 05 December 2008 - 10:30 AM

Is it just me or is there no longer an addon up on curse? Where are you guys getting this for WOTLK?
  • 0

#85 Koschy

Koschy
  • Members
  • Gnomeclass_name
  • US-Medivh
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 81
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 06 December 2008 - 04:59 AM

I just used the registry editing instructions on Page 2 of this thread. I feel safer that way anyway.
  • 0

#86 Caine90

Caine90
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Wildhammer
  • Misery
  • Posts: 1
  • Talents: Combat

Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:10 PM

I did the registry edit too and it worked wonders!

From 250-350 avarage to 60-80! Thank you! <3
  • 0

#87 Aquos

Aquos
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Mal'Ganis
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 429
  • Talents: Brewmaster 0/0/1/2/1/1
  • RBG: 1139
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 07 December 2008 - 07:00 PM

I just did it and now it says I have 400 but I don't lag at all. Is this just a glitch?

If I were to delete the little thing I added in, would it mess up my computer at all or just go back to the way it was before?
  • 0

#88 Koschy

Koschy
  • Members
  • Gnomeclass_name
  • US-Medivh
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 81
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 08 December 2008 - 09:29 AM

If you delete that registry key, it will just go back to like it was before. Nevertheless, you should always have a backup of your registry before you edit it anyway. Just go to File --> Export, and save a copy somewhere.
  • 0

#89 Vapix

Vapix
  • Members
  • Posts: 3

Posted 16 December 2008 - 05:17 PM

I checked those two registry keys on the web.

The first one looks ok.

The second one (TCPNoDelay) seems to disable Nagle's Algorithm for something (MSMQ) that WoW could not possibly be using. The name makes sense, and disabling Nagle's Algorithm can make sense, but if it's limited to MSMQ it should not change the WoW client's behavior.

Has anyone observed any effect from setting
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MSMQ\Parameters\TCPNoDelay = 1 ?

FWIW the first one will sometimes save you 200 ms on a "ping". I can't predict how often, but I'd be surprised to see it reduce average ping by more than 150ms at best.
  • 0

#90 KhadyMagic

KhadyMagic
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Spirestone
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 30
  • Talents: Fire

Posted 10 January 2009 - 01:20 AM

The second registry fix to disable Nagle algorithm on Win2k/XP is as follows:



This is an exact copy and past from mmo-champion, I still have it enabled on my computer with no problems.

This registry edit and the other one mentioned in this thread do the changes from that fasterping program which was linked. If you are paranoid about keyloggers and are comfortable editing the registry then you can just do the 2 registry changes yourself.


Did this and I'm getting owned by DCs, especially in arenas. My ping certainly lowered (from 300 to 80-90), but DCing is rough. I run XP. Anyone else encounter the same problem?
  • 0

#91 cdman2004

cdman2004

Posted 12 January 2009 - 11:03 AM

I'm an XP user, and I'm slightly confused about a few things mentioned on this thread.

1. Do I edit one or two files?
2. Does this enable or disable the ACK frequency?
3. How does enabling or disabling that affect my PC?
4. Can I have some cotton candy?
5. Is this process still viable for WotLK?

/boggle
  • 0

#92 Serrin

Serrin
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Rivendare
  • Emberstorm
  • Posts: 23
  • Talents:

Posted 13 January 2009 - 02:32 PM

I just used the steps on page two of this thread and it brought me down from around 250 to about 100-110. Not bad.
  • 0

#93 Suwabara

Suwabara
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 4
  • Talents: Holy

Posted 18 January 2009 - 10:16 AM

wow I need to try this when I get home. 150 ms on a west server is balls =/
  • 0

#94 Aielas

Aielas
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Thaurissan
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 8
  • Talents: Assassination

Posted 24 January 2009 - 06:27 PM

wow I need to try this when I get home. 150 ms on a west server is balls =/


Yet there are Oceanic players with 200-300 ms doing better than you. Ping isn't an issue in your case.
  • 0

#95 Intolerant

Intolerant
  • Premium
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Lightninghoof
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 22
  • Talents: Arcane

Posted 05 February 2009 - 05:08 AM

I'm rather curious myself I did both of them and it said my MS dropped but I still get random lag spikes in arenas/wintergrasp and only there. WTF
  • 0

#96 Titnium

Titnium
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Executus
  • Stormstrike
  • Posts: 91
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 09 February 2009 - 05:06 PM

From what a friend and I gathered about the Ack frequency, it is a signal sent from your computer to (Ack)nowlege it received a given packet. The lower this frequency, the more upload bandwidth available for use, but it increases the likelyhood and severity of packet loss (lag spikes, random d/c's).
If you experience these problems, it may not be for you.
  • 0

#97 Tremer

Tremer
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Emerald Dream
  • Shadowburn
  • Posts: 85
  • Talents: Holy

Posted 17 February 2009 - 06:49 PM

Yet there are Oceanic players with 200-300 ms doing better than you. Ping isn't an issue in your case.


Your wang is small, but my wang is smaller, therefore your wang is now adequate.

Faulty logic. While WoW in general does not see the effects of a higher latency as soon, 150ms is still pretty bad. At 150ms you'll get a lot of weird OOR errors, get shot around corners, etc.

In the FPS circle a ping of 80ms is unplayable, 150ms is absurd.

For the vast majority of players, a 150ms ping will not be the limiting factor, but having a lower ping does help.
  • 0

#98 Dekaylol

Dekaylol
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • EU-Malfurion
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 7
  • Talents: Frost

Posted 24 February 2009 - 04:49 PM

Works.
  • 0
Your best is my worst.

#99 Cellie

Cellie
  • Members
  • Taurenclass_name
  • US-Bleeding Hollow
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 10
  • Talents: Restoration

Posted 03 March 2009 - 07:28 PM

Yeah, I used to sit around 200ms before I did this fix, now I'm down to 100ms or so. It's not a terribly hard fix, I highly recommend doing it.
  • 0

#100 somal

somal
  • Members
  • Night Elfclass_name
  • US-Deathwing
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 225
  • Talents:

Posted 08 March 2009 - 03:00 AM

Anyone have a link for it now? Its not on curse anymore :/
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<