Jump to content

Photo

Destruction nerfed again


  • Please log in to reply
121 replies to this topic

#41

  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Talents: Frost 1/0/2/2/0/0/0
  • 2v2: 2191
  • 3v3: 2603
  • RBG: 1776

Posted 14 October 2009 - 03:16 AM

UA/corruption haste affected would be nice
  • 0

#42 Boness

Boness
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Kel'Thuzad
  • Nightfall
  • Posts: 863
  • Talents: Affliction
  • RBG: 2213

Posted 14 October 2009 - 03:22 AM

UA/corruption haste affected would be nice


Cant forget Curse of agony the amount of damage it does is a joke and probably would be decent being effected by haste :)
  • 0

#43 Motivate

Motivate
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Lightbringer
  • Whirlwind
  • Posts: 584
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 14 October 2009 - 05:18 AM

yes
  • 0

you couldnt find your shoes if they were on your nose


#44 beyondvengance

beyondvengance
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • US-Thunderlord
  • Vindication
  • Posts: 59
  • Talents: Protection

Posted 14 October 2009 - 05:40 AM

well timed nerf, only took a season and 1/2 :D
  • 0

#45 Ghingis

Ghingis
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • EU-Stormscale
  • Cyclone / Wirbelsturm
  • Posts: 447
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 14 October 2009 - 05:40 AM

is spriest dmg that bad that they need haste applied to all dots while affliction only gets it on corruption?


Its not the damage that is the probably mainly, its the survivability. They need this in order to get pressure.

And if affliction would get haste on all dots, it would just make affliction the new destruction, and please blizzard for the love of god please dont destroy affliction.
  • 0

#46 thexone32

thexone32
  • Stillballin
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Blackrock
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 128
  • Talents: Arms

Posted 14 October 2009 - 06:21 AM

Good, im glad its nerfed. Shit was off the wall overpowered.
  • 0

#47 urterminated

urterminated
  • Members
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Kor'gall
  • Cruelty / Crueldad
  • Posts: 1,076
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 14 October 2009 - 06:25 AM

haha and now they give more burst to mages and not nerf ele shams who were already doing more dmg :) easy to see the reason tho; ppl qq about locks. ppl pay for game. nerf locks :) not saying nerf wasnt needed but ele shams should ve been nerfed too
  • 0

#48 urterminated

urterminated
  • Members
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Kor'gall
  • Cruelty / Crueldad
  • Posts: 1,076
  • Talents: Affliction

Posted 14 October 2009 - 06:26 AM

Its not the damage that is the probably mainly, its the survivability. They need this in order to get pressure.

And if affliction would get haste on all dots, it would just make affliction the new destruction, and please blizzard for the love of god please dont destroy affliction.


the funny thing is SPs get FREE haste for all dots, while locks get for 1 dot via glyph :)
  • 0

#49 Zez

Zez
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Sylvanas
  • Rampage / Saccage
  • Posts: 842
  • Talents: Discipline

Posted 14 October 2009 - 09:31 AM

Problem with destro is that you will never chaincast to fill in the gaps of this burst nerf with incinerates or w/e, either you are going to get trained to death and you will have limited casts, or you are going to be cced to eternity (rmp) .

Cause teams who leave you free to cast, well.. ok.


Ever tried playing with fmage or ele shaman?
  • 0

#50 Craton

Craton
  • Members
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Hyjal
  • Whirlwind
  • Posts: 5,298
  • Talents:

Posted 14 October 2009 - 09:44 AM

the funny thing is SPs get FREE haste for all dots, while locks get for 1 dot via glyph :)



I dunno why you're still trying to apply logic to balance decisions Blizzard makes. That train left the station awhile ago. As far as any of us are concerned they don't realize other classes exist when trying to balance one.
  • 0
화이팅

#51 Bigdollars

Bigdollars
  • Members
  • Humanclass_name
  • EU-Outland
  • Misery
  • Posts: 317
  • Talents: Affliction 1/1/2/0/0/1/1

Posted 14 October 2009 - 10:11 AM

brb gonna reroll:warrior:
  • 0
Posted Image

#52 alliner

alliner
  • Members
  • Blood Elfclass_name
  • EU-Burning Blade
  • Blackout
  • Posts: 10
  • Talents: Holy

Posted 14 October 2009 - 11:00 AM

/cheer
  • 0

#53 DkH.ZeRa

DkH.ZeRa
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Eredar
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 341
  • Talents: Destruction 0/0/1/1/2/1/0
  • 2v2: 1674
  • 3v3: 2551
  • 5v5: 672
  • RBG: 1769

Posted 14 October 2009 - 02:35 PM

And now that the op of the specc is gone idd[...]
hf dealing with the op'd now that your only way to kill something is a 12 second cd ability that has a cast time.

The way to deal with imbalances is your own type of imbalance..
If you dont have one, welcome to the start of s5 lock representation numbers and have fun.


You are right man. I cant really believe why ele-shamans still have their burst and their totems, warris with their faceroll damage and ferals in this actual situation.
So whats about shamans (top class at 2on2, 3on3 AND 5on5) or RMP?
http://www.sk-gaming...ll/all/all/all/

But WLs have to be nerfed because they have a HUGE arena representation! (9%)
http://www.sk-gaming.com/arena/player/

Ok, that what's we really needed. Thanks.

(I would put WoW in Blizzard's ass, but I dont know how. So I'm leveling my feral to 80, two-shot pets and have some fun.)
  • 0
Posted Image

#54 Gabobin

Gabobin
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 380

Posted 14 October 2009 - 02:42 PM

I dont see why u locks qq about this...
U have been more than good in pvp since s1 till now and nothing's gona change it.
  • 0

#55 DkH.ZeRa

DkH.ZeRa
  • Junkies
  • Orcclass_name
  • EU-Eredar
  • Blutdurst
  • Posts: 341
  • Talents: Destruction 0/0/1/1/2/1/0
  • 2v2: 1674
  • 3v3: 2551
  • 5v5: 672
  • RBG: 1769

Posted 14 October 2009 - 02:56 PM

I dont see why u locks qq about this...
U have been more than good in pvp since s1 till now and nothing's gona change it.


I played Priest/WL (former SP/Afflock) for 3 years. DONT TELL ME THAT WE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN GOOD SINCE S1!

Not all WLs play fotm and faceroll with druids since S1.

Check out all combos and dont decide about warlocks because of a fotm-combo. Fotm has always to be nerfed to get more viable speccs/combos. And so blizzard has to nerf RMP!
  • 0
Posted Image

#56 Domesauce

Domesauce
  • Junkies
  • Undeadclass_name
  • US-Tichondrius
  • Bloodlust
  • Posts: 873
  • Talents: Affliction 0/0/1/0/2/1
  • RBG: 2098

Posted 14 October 2009 - 02:59 PM

You are right man. I cant really believe why ele-shamans still have their burst and their totems, warris with their faceroll damage and ferals in this actual situation.
So whats about shamans (top class at 2on2, 3on3 AND 5on5) or RMP?
http://www.sk-gaming...ll/all/all/all/

But WLs have to be nerfed because they have a HUGE arena representation! (9%)
http://www.sk-gaming.com/arena/player/

Ok, that what's we really needed. Thanks.

(I would put WoW in Blizzard's ass, but I dont know how. So I'm leveling my feral to 80, two-shot pets and have some fun.)


representation says absolutely nothing about what abilities actually need to be changed... pretty sure we're smart people and can figure out if destro burst needed to be nerfed without looking at skgaming, same way we can see that warrior/feral/ele/tremor needs nerfs as well.
  • 0

#57 jinsk

jinsk
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 301

Posted 14 October 2009 - 03:06 PM

Inc hasted DoT shadowplay though!


corruption only for locks gg.... hope aff gets an extra dot tbh OR haste on all dots...
  • 0

#58 jinsk

jinsk
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 301

Posted 14 October 2009 - 03:07 PM

is spriest dmg that bad that they need haste applied to all dots while affliction only gets it on corruption?


this... aff should get haste on all dots aswell or an extra dot
  • 0

#59 Varnius

Varnius
  • Junkies
  • Humanclass_name
  • US-Mannoroth
  • Ruin
  • Posts: 480
  • Talents: Affliction
  • RBG: 2379

Posted 14 October 2009 - 05:07 PM

I'm pretty convinced that the changes are not going to significantly impact a skilled destruction warlock's ability to win games. I'm sure it will seem to have a significant impact to people who entirely or mostly relied on exploding someone out the gate to win matches.

We'll miss a few RNG gibs and so have less "wow we just evaporated that guy" moments, but the core functionality of the spec is still very strong.

This also doesn't change the fact that feral, ele shaman, and warrior DPS is all also far too high.
  • 0

#60 holowicki

holowicki
  • Members
  • Goblinclass_name
  • US-Frostmane
  • Reckoning
  • Posts: 101
  • Talents: Frost

Posted 14 October 2009 - 05:19 PM

I don't understand the warrior and shaman complaints from warlocks if some of the top 5s comps have destro lock + ele sham, and one of the top 3s involves warrior and warlock. Only complaint warlocks should have is having to respec affliction? Im just tired of destro lock rogue killing anything and everything before they can blink...................
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

<