Str over ARP Users
Posted 07 October 2009 - 11:15 PM
Posted 08 October 2009 - 01:43 AM
Posted 08 October 2009 - 06:32 AM
I believe popping reck while being nuked by mage rogue is better than going defensive
yeah, that wasn't my best move
long story short - streaming for 400 people playing 2's, i popped reck instead of SW (fat fingers) against a mage/rogue n wondered why i died.
yes, im a bad player.
Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:07 AM
Last season i was 4/5 pvp gear with T8 chest and full ArP gems and Grim Toll (axe).
This season i am 5/5 pvp with rage instead of GT and full str (sword). As far as the damage goes: Sure GT+bladestorm could roflcopter someone down, but atleast in 2v2 i feel that all the semi-pve-geared-warriors with 2 T9 arp and GT initially make more damage than me and can pressure my paladin healer for a while, but after like a few minutes they arent able to do that any more (i dont really know why). And then the damage from str catches up, rending all targets and the bleeds ticking for 1,1-1,4k is very nice imo instead of ticking for 800 dmg. And when their GT is gone they dont really have their burst left, but i do Charge MS OP Execute with RNG Swordproc is very nice, even against plate.
In 3v3 this season with sword str i dont feel that big of a difference, i play WarrDkHpal and we almost never tries to kill the other teams platetank. If GT didnt proc during my Bladestorms last season it was kinda sad, but atm it seems just as good if not better with str sword over axe arp, you can argue all you want that arp>str but this is my thoughts ^^
Posted 08 October 2009 - 01:53 PM
Posted 08 October 2009 - 02:48 PM
Guess PVE heros ( melolol ) will be going to str with that bonus, it's pretty awesome.
2 piece T10 will favor strength users heavily!
Item - Warrior T10 Melee 2P Bonus - When your Rend and Deep Wounds abilities deal damage you have a 2% chance to gain 20% attack power for until cancelled.
Posted 08 October 2009 - 02:55 PM
Lol at bonus duration: i accidentally the whole two piece bonus!
Edit: As far as I know all tests that have been conducted have always had the disclaimer [did not factor in rend and deep wounds]
Posted 09 October 2009 - 06:33 AM
Posted 09 October 2009 - 02:50 PM
I don't see how anyone can still advocate str over arp when arp has been proven to be more damage in all scenarios?
It's somewhat proven to be more damage in all scenarios where good PvE gear is involved. Prove to me that it's better in full PvP gear.
Posted 09 October 2009 - 02:52 PM
It's somewhat proven to be more damage in all scenarios where PvE gear is involved. Prove to me that it's better in full PvP gear.
^ And without a Grim Toll or Mjolnir.
Former Ranked 8th Warrior/Shammy in the world.
"Then Jesus once said, 'I can offer you eternal salvation'. The disciples responded, 'Can we have might or kings instead?"' --Noob 13:3-7
Posted 09 October 2009 - 05:06 PM
Posted 09 October 2009 - 05:54 PM
Now that I took deeper nerd look at his chars ( lol ) his tauren is STR gemed and sword specced.
While the orc is axe specced but also STR gemed.
Posted 09 October 2009 - 05:55 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users