Full Restoration spec without Healing Touch glyph. (16/0/55) by Drikor

Full Restoration spec without Healing Touch glyph.

Balance (16)

 
Starlight Wrath0/5
Genesis5/5
 
Moonglow3/3
Nature's Majesty2/2
 
Improved Moonfire0/2
Brambles0/3
Nature's Grace3/1
Nature's Splendor1/1
Nature's Reach2/2

Restoration (55)

Improved Mark of the Wild2/2
Nature's Focus3/3
Furor0/5
 
Naturalist0/5
Subtlety3/3
Natural Shapeshifter3/3
 
Intensity3/3
Omen of Clarity1/1
Master Shapeshifter2/2
 
 
Tranquil Spirit0/5
Improved Rejuvenation3/3
 
Nature's Swiftness1/1
Gift of Nature5/5
 
Improved Tranquility0/2
Empowered Touch0/2
 
Improved Regrowth4/5
 
Living Spirit3/3
Swiftmend1/1
Natural Perfection3/3
 
 
Empowered Rejuvenation5/5
Living Seed3/3
 
Replenish0/3
Tree of Life1/1
Improved Tree of Life3/3
 
  
Gift of the Earthmother5/5
 
 
Wild Growth1/1
  

Comments:

DarthwaffleDec 31, 2008 - 10:43 PM (HideShow)
In my spec I have 2 in empowered touch and max in imp regrowth with none in living seed. I like having the bomb heal with NS HT crits for like 15k I think and i never really liked living seed because all that crits is swiftmend NS HT regrowth and nourish(I dont get many nourishes or Regrowths off).
NiogeJan 18, 2009 - 12:13 PM (HideShow)
It´s a very good spec cause it combinates healing power und manareg . And it is the only spec which you can use as healing in pvp and pve . So it saves a lot of money ;)
HonawakanJan 28, 2009 - 1:48 AM (HideShow)
Living Seed is very vital, just the fact that it works on Swiftmend alone makes it awsome, my swiftmend crits a lot, and I usually use it when my target is ~half health (and if my hots aren't going to help raise my target's hp up), even though the crit pretty much means garenteed 100%, the living seed allows my target to take one spike damage, meanwhile I can do other stuff, maybe heal other peoples (even myself) or cyclone/roots.

It's basically this: Increased critical healing by 30%, but since that's overheal, it'll wait till the target takes damage before applying, which signifigantly reduces overheal.
ObbiFeb 3, 2009 - 2:01 PM (HideShow)
I would tend to disagree with going with Emp. touch as darth suggests due to the fact.. as is in arenas Atm youll only be using the NS HT once per arena if u get to use 2 thats an odd match. I do this spec without natures grace but i recently respecced to get it and its extremely amazing the fact that u crit ur regrowth almost everyhit its very viable also swiftmend has a high crit % for me in arenas :S so a 1sec cyclone can save my life alot of times when i get that crit swiftmend running away from a DPS Living seed is great for extra lil bit of + healing on those clutch crits :D all in all the better spec atm imo!
HitoFeb 11, 2009 - 10:57 AM (HideShow)
With 13-14% crit Living Seed is wasted with most pvp resto gear..
DexoeFeb 14, 2009 - 5:10 PM (HideShow)
Living seed is sorta useless. Sometimes it's a lifesaver and sometimes it's a waste. If you like playing offensively, Living Seed is a good idea to put points in.
On the other hand, if you WERE playing offensively, you would probably not be playing this spec.
VeyzMar 27, 2009 - 8:16 PM (HideShow)
hito, it seems like youve forgotten the "Improved Regrowth" talent points
RdsApr 18, 2009 - 1:35 AM (HideShow)
NEW TALENTS NOW~~~~
VadorMay 9, 2009 - 8:54 PM (HideShow)
second
FuerurMay 20, 2009 - 1:21 PM (HideShow)
Which glyphs are you using with this?
WodarkJul 12, 2009 - 1:13 PM (HideShow)
how about updating the specc?? since there is new talents
NotorioussJul 27, 2009 - 12:59 AM (HideShow)
I dont see any need to go into wild growth i skipped that last talent and put some points into imp barkskin... i cant say much since i only just started pvping this week but was this a good choice??
AejAug 23, 2009 - 12:36 PM (HideShow)
wat glyphs?
CelebosOct 5, 2009 - 10:32 PM (HideShow)
this is so outdated... improved barkskin isn't even on the tree.

Reply:


World of Warcraft and Blizzard Entertainment are both trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment in the United States and/or other countries. These terms and all related materials, logos, and images are copyright © Blizzard Entertainment. This site is in no way associated with or endorsed by Blizzard Entertainment.