Jump to content

  • Curse Sites
Help
Rate Article   - - - - -

As requested, here is the breakdown of gladiators by class for the first season of WotLK. We will keep continue to update this statistics at the end of each season to see how the trends form. Again, this is only the representation of gladiators as they are registered on the site, and not the overall list. That being said, it should still be a fairly accurate representation of the whole. Enjoy :)

Season Five Gladiators:
:paladin: Paladin: 600 - 18.59%
:deathknight: Death Knight: 440 - 13.63%
:rogue: Rogue: 390 - 12.09%
:priest: Priest: 352 - 10.91%
:warlock: Warlock: 268 - 8.30%
:shaman: Shaman: 263 - 8.15%
:hunter: Hunter: 262 - 8.12%
:mage: Mage: 243 - 7.53%
:druid: Druid: 243 - 7.53%
:warrior: Warrior: 165 - 5.11%

Season Five Deadly Gladiators:
:paladin: Paladin: 45 - 17.79%
:deathknight: Death Knight: 44 - 17.39%
:hunter: Hunter: 38 - 15.02%
:priest: Priest: 37 - 14.62%
:mage: Mage: 27 - 10.67%
:shaman: Shaman: 25 - 9.88%
:rogue: Rogue: 17 - 6.72%
:warlock: Warlock: 9 - 3.56%
:druid: Druid: 9 - 3.56%
:warrior: Warrior: 2 - 0.79%
Posted in: News

Comments

#1 salice

salice
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 1234

Posted 05 May 2009 - 03:03 AM

I like it when you post these up.  Do you happen to have Deadly representation as well?

#2 sogaklad

sogaklad
  • Members
  • Posts: 123

Posted 05 May 2009 - 03:05 AM

AHAHAHAHAHHA

#3 vigggor

vigggor
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 47

Posted 05 May 2009 - 03:06 AM

Cool.

#4 Dwarfstrider

Dwarfstrider
  • Members
  • Posts: 46

Posted 05 May 2009 - 03:22 AM

But every s5 glad was a pally/dk/hunter amirite? Thank god they balanced our class for s6.

#5 Tyveris

Tyveris
  • Premium Junkies
  • Curse Premium
  • Posts: 6889

Posted 05 May 2009 - 03:22 AM

[quote name='salice']I like it when you post these up.  Do you happen to have Deadly representation as well?[/quote]
Updated with known deadly representation.

#6 ragzdog

ragzdog
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 2865

Posted 05 May 2009 - 03:48 AM

:deathknight::paladin:

#7 nubmadri

nubmadri
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 644

Posted 05 May 2009 - 04:14 AM

probably not an accurate representation of the whole cuz tons of first time dk/pal glads probably aren't registered on AJ, whereas warrior glads are much more likely to be repeat glads from BC that have at some point registered on AJ.  iirc there was some thread where somebody counted up the glads on bg9, bgchogall, and a few other big US bgs and there was over 5x as many dk glads as warr glads... well, maybe im only imagining the numbers but u get the idea

#8 Slaughterz

Slaughterz
  • Members
  • Posts: 621

Posted 05 May 2009 - 04:23 AM

I doubt all the facerolling 12 year old DKs/hunterspallies even heard of AJ.

#9 wisdomcube

wisdomcube
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 1302

Posted 05 May 2009 - 04:35 AM

I wonder how this varies by region

#10 Pookette

Pookette
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 3108

Posted 05 May 2009 - 04:47 AM

i thought there would be a lot less warriors.

#11 Angelsrdead

Angelsrdead
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 555

Posted 05 May 2009 - 05:08 AM

I dont get the point, why everyone in S5 was crying about DK+Pal that owned 2s, when there is almost the same amount of glad rogues like DKs. People sure are weird. If it would be also parted by the brackets and regions, it would be great, but it would be pretty hard =(

#12 Agx

Agx
  • Members
  • Posts: 33

Posted 05 May 2009 - 05:13 AM

[quote name='Angelsrdead']I dont get the point, why everyone in S5 was crying about DK+Pal that owned 2s, when there is almost the same amount of glad rogues like DKs. People sure are weird. If it would be also parted by the brackets and regions, it would be great, but it would be pretty hard =([/QUOTE]

Your sig is why.

#13 Atmosfear

Atmosfear
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 192

Posted 05 May 2009 - 05:53 AM

[quote name='Agx']Your sig is why.[/QUOTE]

this, you need to add 2k(non glad) next to your s6 dk icon.

people are crying because dk/pal had virtually no counters and hence nothing stopping them getting glad, and then people such as yourself suddenly go from 2k to 2.5k all in one skilled reroll.

#14 Missekatten

Missekatten
  • Members
  • Posts: 822

Posted 05 May 2009 - 09:07 AM

Priest/rogues were alot closer to dk/pal/hunter representation than i thought.

#15 Adrame

Adrame
  • Members
  • Posts: 2

Posted 05 May 2009 - 09:11 AM

Damn those UP priests

#16 Lycaon

Lycaon
  • Members
  • Posts: 1194

Posted 05 May 2009 - 09:12 AM

I'd like to know how many of those druids were feral, cus I almost couldn't believe it yesterday when I was in arena, we faced Deadly Gladiator Druid with a rogue, and his resto gear seemed fine, deadly wep etc. We downed them 4 times as resto/ret and one time resto/rogue.. I felt sorry for them

#17 Naamari

Naamari
  • Members
  • Posts: 225

Posted 05 May 2009 - 09:15 AM

if you'd look at 2s glads only then there'd be much more % dk/pals, probably a good number of rogues and priests got theirs from RMP
Posted Image

#18 Missekatten

Missekatten
  • Members
  • Posts: 822

Posted 05 May 2009 - 09:32 AM

Yea thats me looking at numbers too quickly naamari.

and well Lycaon, it was possible to get deadly glad as resto druid :)
and downing a resto/rogue as resto/ret doesnt seem like any big accomplishment from my PoV, but ohh well havent played it.

#19 Angelsrdead

Angelsrdead
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 555

Posted 05 May 2009 - 10:00 AM

[quote name='Atmosfear']this, you need to add 2k(non glad) next to your s6 dk icon.

people are crying because dk/pal had virtually no counters and hence nothing stopping them getting glad, and then people such as yourself suddenly go from 2k to 2.5k all in one skilled reroll.[/QUOTE]
I played heal pal + rogue, impossible combo in impossible times and was able to get 2k rating, so I dont see a points in your arguments, taht some people couldnt get S5 glad, priests.
Rgds

#20 fant0m8

fant0m8
  • Junkies
  • Posts: 4336

Posted 05 May 2009 - 10:04 AM

Damn those OP Hunters. Thank god we nerfed them 18 times instead of 3-4 times or they would have facerolled their way to a huge representation again this season.

(Deadly glad hunter representation is carried by 5's.)

<