PDA

View Full Version : Question about the arena "0.5%"


djzapz
09-20-2007, 11:46 PM
I was wondering if some teams were ignored (like the ones that are at 1500 and have never played)

I thought there was like 8000-9000 3v3 teams in my battlegroup which would mean 0.5% = 40-45 teams hit gladiator, but recently my friend found a team with a rating of 999 and their rank was like 15000th (anyways that's what he says)

So assuming that there's 15000+ 3v3 teams in my battlegroup, can I expect over 75 teams to get their gladiator tag in 3v3 or not?

Phiers
09-20-2007, 11:50 PM
There are around 30,000 2v2s in my battlegroup, so that doesn't seem farfetched for 3v3.

Jaz
09-21-2007, 11:36 AM
There are around 30,000 2v2s in my battlegroup, so that doesn't seem farfetched for 3v3.

That many? So top 150 2v2 teams will get glad? That's hardly 2060ish. That feels attainable. Where did you get that figure?

Sern
09-21-2007, 11:51 AM
There’s a 2v2 team in the Shadowburn Battlegroup that’s ranked 27,000 something(they lose every match on purpose) so that’s around 135 teams its to easy to get a title now, they need to cap it somehow.

Phiers
09-21-2007, 05:05 PM
There are around 30,000 2v2s in my battlegroup, so that doesn't seem farfetched for 3v3.

That many? So top 150 2v2 teams will get glad? That's hardly 2060ish. That feels attainable. Where did you get that figure?

I found a team rated 1187 with standing 28456 a week ago. That would put a fair estimate at about 29000, and 28500 to be safe. Which is about 2060 rating, though I wouldn't imagine it'll stay like that when people powerlvling other teams and whatnot focus on their own, as well as some new people making the push, but I'd guesstimate that about 100 points less than last season's requirement for 2v2 will get gladiator this season.

Durxa
09-21-2007, 06:07 PM
it's getting ridiculous, we were 2225 2v2, and were 9th... with top 25 teams getting the title...

roughly 4 weeks later, due to my internet being almost too retarded, were 2131, ranked 30th and now top 50 teams are getting it

(KKTHNXBAI) =(

Bustuarii
09-22-2007, 12:34 AM
it's getting ridiculous, we were 2225 2v2, and were 9th... with top 25 teams getting the title...

roughly 4 weeks later, due to my internet being almost too retarded, were 2131, ranked 30th and now top 50 teams are getting it

(KKTHNXBAI) =(

You had much less competition back then, though, so it is fair. I didn't reach lvl 70 until the last 2 weeks of Season 1, and I'm sure many people were in the same boat.

Twopointo
09-22-2007, 01:03 AM
Top 80 2v2 teams got the title last season for Shadowburn. It'll prolly go another season like this. Since that's most likely the case, I have a Glad title inc for my pally, hunter, and my shaman of course. GG blizz.

Drulethen
09-22-2007, 03:10 AM
Top 80 2v2 teams got the title last season for Shadowburn. It'll prolly go another season like this. Since that's most likely the case, I have a Glad title inc for my pally, hunter, and my shaman of course. GG blizz.

The fact that you can get gladiator for all 3 classes doesn't mean that its "bad," it merely means you are good enough of a player to dominate with three different classes against the rest of the competition.

Hereoh
09-22-2007, 09:55 AM
Top 80 2v2 teams got the title last season for Shadowburn. It'll prolly go another season like this. Since that's most likely the case, I have a Glad title inc for my pally, hunter, and my shaman of course. GG blizz.

The fact that you can get gladiator for all 3 classes doesn't mean that its "bad," it merely means you are good enough of a player to dominate with three different classes against the rest of the competition.

Either that or you play too much.