[3v3] Rogue/Resto Druid/SL Warlock vs...

[tessatestaro]

What do you do against a team with warr/pally/anything set up (mage/sham typically)? It doesnt matter how much I try to cyclone/root the warrior b/c all he has to do is stun our rogue and spamstring all day long since warriors can spam berserker rage to gain immunity to fear...we know its futile to try to burn paladin b/c he can just bubble while 3rd party member can either burn/CC with the warrior...its impossible to burn 3rd party member down because if hes a mage, then he'll have no prob. kiting the rogue with warrior spamming hamstring and shamans can keep spamming earthbind totem (with blessing of freedom) with warrior spamming spamstring...if he gets far enough, he pops his CDs to burn rogue in 3 seconds flat.

thoughts?

[zoltarc]

You've got the ability to make the paladin have to bubble very early with a druid and lock.

I'd get on the 3rd, cyclone and root the war as much as possible per usual. If you get kited away by BoF (hopefully you can dispel it) you should switch onto the warrior. If the paladin has already bubbled you've got a decent chance of being able to kill him if your lock is locking down their healer (Cot + fear + spell lock, potentially Death coil + help from the druid with FC/cyclone) or if not you can make the pally bubble.

When the 3rd kites away you try to cyclone them to prevent them from being healed and coming back immediately and being disruptive. Preventing them from being healed up by dpsing a secondary target means the opposing healer has to start making choices between who to heal up (esp if you keep CoT up as much as possible) and that means you generally have 1 mid/low health target to get on or they get behind enough on healing where you can burn the warrior down.